Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Sep 1;79(1):20–27. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001766

Table 2.

Controlled direct effect (CDE) of school attendance on incident HIV and HSV-2 by different levels of the mediators partner number and partner age difference

HIV HSV-2

Risk (%) RD % (95% CI) RR (95% CI) Risk (%) RD %(95% CI) RR (95% CI)
Total effect
 High attendance 4.7 −1.6 (−2.3, −1.0) 0.74 (0.66,0.83) 6.7 −8.3 (−9.1, −7.5) 0.45 (0.41, 0.49)
 Low attendance 6.3 0 1.0 15.1 0 1
CDE No older partners
 High attendance 4.6 −1.2 (−1.8, −0.7) 0.79 (0.70, 0.88) 6.3 −6.2 (−7.1, −5.4) 0.51 (0.46, 0.55)
 Low attendance 5.8 0 1 12.6 0 1
CDE No sexual partners
 High attendance 3.2 −0.4 (−0.9, 0.1) 0.89 (0.77, 1.03) 5.8 −6.9 (−7.8, −6.1) 0.46 (0.41, 0.50)
 Low attendance 3.6 0 1 12.8 0 1
CDE One sexual partner
 High attendance 7.0 −0.8 (−1.6, −0.1) 0.89 (0.81, 0.98) 8.2 −7.6 (−8.5, −6.7) 0.52 (0.48,0.56)
 Low attendance 7.8 0 1 15.8 0 1
*

RD: Risk Difference, RR: Risk Ratio, CI: Confidence Interval