Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Sep 1;79(1):83–91. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001755

Table 3.

Cognitive performance by anticholinergic burden.

Total Anticholinergic Burden
Generalized linear model
Outcome Obs 0 1 >1 Overall 1 vs. 0 >1 vs. 0 >1 vs. 1
(n=1223) (n=237) (n=98)
M (SE) M (SE) M (SE) p-value p-value p-value p-value
Global NP 1556 3.3 (0.10) 3.4 (0.14) 3.6 (0.20) 0.07 0.21 0.03 0.26
Memory 1553 2.4 (0.08) 2.6 (0.12) 2.6 (0.17) 0.22 0.18 0.17 0.69
Learning 1553 2.4 (0.08) 2.7 (0.12) 3.0 (0.18) <0.001* 0.03 0.0003 0.06
Attention/WM 1398 2.4 (0.09) 2.2 (0.11) 2.3 (0.17) 0.40 0.21 0.50 0.86
Executive Function 1540 2.8 (0.09) 2.8 (0.13) 3.3 (0.20) 0.02 0.69 0.0003 0.02
Speed 1555 2.7 (0.09) 2.8 (0.12) 2.8 (0.17) 0.78 0.63 0.56 0.83
Fluency 1550 2.6 (0.09) 2.7 (0.12) 2.7 (0.16) 0.84 0.57 0.84 0.87
Motor 1531 2.4 (0.09) 2.5 (0.13) 2.7 (0.18) 0.34 0.57 0.15 0.35

Note. Bold=significant at p<0.05. WM=working memory; NP=neuropsychological. M = estimated mean T-score; SE = standard error; OR=odds ratio.

controlling for HIV− and HCV status, site, current employment status, depressive symptoms, heavy drinking, smoking, marijuana, crack, cocaine and/or heroin use.

*

after controlling the false discovery rate using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure the overall association remained significant.