Abstract
Mouse Tmc1 and Tmc2 are required for sensory transduction in cochlear and vestibular hair cells. Homozygous Tmc1∆/∆ mice are deaf, Tmc2∆/∆ mice have normal hearing, and double homozygous Tmc1∆/∆; Tmc2∆/∆ mice have deafness and profound vestibular dysfunction. These phenotypes are consistent with their different spatiotemporal expression patterns. Tmc1 expression is persistent in cochlear and vestibular hair cells, whereas Tmc2 expression is transient in cochlear hair cells but persistent in vestibular hair cells. On the basis of these findings, we hypothesized that persistent Tmc2 expression in mature cochlear hair cells could restore auditory function in Tmc1∆/∆ mice. To express Tmc2 in mature cochlear hair cells, we generated a transgenic mouse line, Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2], in which Tmc2 cDNA is expressed under the control of the Tmc1 promoter. The Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] transgene slightly but significantly restored hearing in young Tmc1∆/∆ mice, though hearing thresholds were elevated with age. The elevation of hearing thresholds was associated with deterioration of sensory transduction in inner hair cells and loss of outer hair cell function. Although sensory transduction was retained in outer hair cells, their stereocilia eventually degenerated. These results indicate distinct roles and requirements for Tmc1 and Tmc2 in mature cochlear hair cells.
Introduction
The primary sensory cells of the auditory organ, known as hair cells (HCs), are arranged as one row of inner HCs and three rows of outer HCs along the cochlear sensory epithelium. Inner HCs and outer HCs have different functions. Sensory receptor potentials in inner HCs induce neurotransmitter release to 95% of the auditory afferent fibers1,2. Thus, inner HCs function as the primary acoustic sensors. In contrast, outer HCs have few contacts with auditory afferent fibers and the role of this input remains to be identified3,4. Depolarization and hyperpolarization of outer HCs induces contraction and elongation of outer HC somata5,6. This property, known as electromotility, contributes to amplitude and frequency selectivity of sound vibrations in a process known as cochlear amplification. Electromotility and cochlear amplification depend on prestin, a transmembrane motor protein located within the outer HC lateral membrane7,8. Amplification can be assessed by measuring otoacoustic-emissions emerging from the cochlea with a microphone inserted in the external auditory canal.
Inner and outer HCs thus have distinct functions and it remains unknown whether this reflects differences in the molecules that mediate sensory transduction. Sensory transduction channels are non-selective cation channels whose precise molecular composition remains uncertain9. The opening of sensory transduction channels induces an influx of cations, predominantly potassium and calcium ions, from endolymph, the extracellular fluid that bathes sensory hair bundles in the apical membranes of HCs10. Endolymph has a distinctive ionic composition with low Na+ and Ca2+ concentrations and high K+ concentrations. The high K+ concentration contributes to a positive electrochemical potential, the endocochlear potential, across the HC apical surface which increases the driving force for cation influx during sensory transduction11. The influx of cations results in depolarizing receptor potentials which lead to the activation of voltage-gated calcium channels, neurotransmitter release and activation of glutamatergic auditory nerve fibers whose afferent terminals contact the basolateral membrane of the inner HCs10.
Initiation of the HC sensory transduction cascade requires expression of transmembrane channel like-1 (TMC1), which was identified as the gene mutated in DFNA36 and DFNB7/B11 non-syndromic hearing loss12. The mouse ortholog Tmc1 also has dominant and recessive mutant alleles that cause hearing loss in mouse strains including Beethoven (Bth), deafness (dn), and mice with targeted deletion of Tmc1 (Tmc1∆/∆)12–14. In general, the mouse genes and proteins required for auditory function show high similarities of sequence and functions with their human orthologs15.
Studies of mouse models revealed that TMC1 and the closely related TMC2 protein are located at the tips of stereocilia and are required for sensory transduction14,16. While the precise function of TMC1 and TMC2 remains unclear, there is substantial evidence that TMC1 and TMC2 are components of the HC sensory transduction channel17,18. Double homozygous Tmc1∆/∆; Tmc2∆/∆ mice showed a complete loss of peripheral auditory and vestibular function with a complete absence of sensory transduction current in structurally intact cochlear and vestibular HCs14. Furthermore, sensory transduction currents could be restored by viral expression of exogenous TMC1 or TMC2 in cultured Tmc1∆/∆; Tmc2∆/∆ HCs14. Whereas Tmc1∆/∆ (Tmc1∆/∆; Tmc2+/+) mice are deaf with normal vestibular function, Tmc2∆/∆ (Tmc1+/+; Tmc2∆/∆) mice have normal auditory function and partial loss of vestibular function detected as a reduction in the acceleration gain of the vestibulo-ocular reflex14.
The difference between Tmc1∆/∆ and Tmc2∆/∆ phenotypes could result from functional differences between the TMC1 and TMC2 proteins. Alternatively, it might reflect the different spatiotemporal expression patterns of Tmc1 and Tmc2. Tmc2 expression is transient in early postnatal cochlear HCs but persists in vestibular HCs, whereas Tmc1 expression is persistent in both mature cochlear and vestibular HCs (Supplementary Fig. 1). The persistent Tmc2 expression in vestibular HCs might thus preserve vestibular function in mature Tmc1∆/∆ mice. We therefore hypothesized that expression of Tmc2 in mature cochlear HCs could restore auditory function in Tmc1∆/∆ mice.
In this study, we generated a transgenic mouse line, Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2], in which a Tmc2 cDNA under transcriptional control of the Tmc1 promoter is expressed in mature cochlear HCs. The Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] transgene partially restored cochlear HC and auditory function in Tmc1∆/∆ mice, indicating that TMC1 and TMC2 have related but distinct roles for HC development, function, and survival.
Results
Generation of Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] mice
In order to express TMC2 in mature cochlear HCs, we designed and generated transgenic mice, Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2], in which Tmc2 would be expressed under the control of the Tmc1 promoter. To create the Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] transgene, we started with a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone encoding all exons of Tmc1 and an additional 5 kb of flanking sequence both upstream and downstream of the gene. This BAC encodes the cis-regulatory elements required for inner ear expression of Tmc1 since it restores normal auditory function in Tmc1∆/∆ mice16. We replaced the translation initiation codon of Tmc1 in the BAC with a Tmc2 cDNA and an adjacent downstream polyadenylation signal (PAS). A region including Tmc1 exons 8–9 was deleted to prevent the expression of functional Tmc1 from the BAC (Fig. 1A). We obtained six founder lines segregating Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] and used quantitative genomic PCR analysis to estimate the transgene copy numbers in each line. The copy numbers were 2, 2, 2, 3, 6 and 6, respectively, for lines 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Each founder line was crossed twice with Tmc1∆/∆ mice to generate Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice. We performed experiments, with the exception of measurement of sensory transduction currents (measured only in line 1), in Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ lines 1, 4 and 5. In the following sections, we show the data for the Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] founder line 1, since the results were not significantly different from those with founder lines 4 or 5.
We generated other BAC transgenic mouse lines, Tg[PTmc1::Tmc1] and Tg[Tmc1∆Ex8_9], as positive and negative control lines, respectively. Tg[PTmc1::Tmc1] mice were used to confirm expression of Tmc1 cDNA under the control of the Tmc1 promoter. Tg[Tmc1∆Ex8_9] mice were used to rule out functional evidence of expression of TMC1 from Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]. We obtained three founder lines segregating Tg[PTmc1::Tmc1] with estimated transgene copy numbers of 5, 6 and 17. We performed experiments with Tg[PTmc1::Tmc1] lines 1 and 3 with transgene copy numbers of 5 and 17, respectively. The results for Tg[PTmc1::Tmc1]; Tmc1∆/∆ line 1 are presented in the following sections since the results were not significantly different from those for line 3. We obtained six founder lines segregating Tg[Tmc1∆Ex8_9] with estimated transgene copy numbers of 2, 2, 2, 4, 10 and 14. We performed experiments with Tg[Tmc1∆Ex8_9] lines 1 and 6 with transgene copy numbers of 2 and 14, respectively. In the following sections, the results for Tg[Tmc1∆Ex8_9] line 6 are shown since the results were not significantly different from those for line 1.
Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] expresses Tmc2
We examined Tmc2 mRNA levels in Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ cochleae using TaqMan quantitative RT-PCR with target-specific probes. Transgenic and endogenous Tmc2 mRNA were amplified separately from each other using specific primers. The reverse primer to amplify transgenic Tmc2 mRNA hybridizes to the SV40 polyadenylation site sequence encoded by the BAC transgene, whereas the reverse primer to amplify endogenous Tmc2 mRNA hybridizes to the genomic 3′ UTR. Actb-normalized data were used for relative comparison to wild-type Tmc2 mRNA levels at P0 using the ∆∆Ct method. Transgenic Tmc2 mRNA was identified after embryonic day 17.5 (E17.5) and persisted at postnatal day 25 (P25, Fig. 1B), the last time point examined. Endogenous Tmc2 mRNA expression was not significantly different from that in wild-type Tmc1+/+ cochleae (Fig. 1B, Student’s t-test, P > 0.05). This result indicates that the Tmc1 promoter in the BAC transgene functions to express transgenic Tmc2 in mature cochlear HCs.
Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] promotes cochlear hair cell survival in Tmc1∆/∆ mice
As previously described, mutations in Tmc1 lead to loss of normal hair bundle morphology and eventual death of both inner and outer HCs12,13,19. Likewise, we found that inner HC stereocilia bundles in Tmc1∆/∆ cochleae at P25 showed evidence of degeneration in middle to basal turns and that outer HC stereocilia bundles showed evidence of degeneration throughout the cochlea from apical to basal turns (Fig. 2). In contrast, Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ inner HC stereocilia bundles remained intact from the apical to basal turns (Fig. 2). Both inner and outer HC stereocilia bundles also remained intact in Tg[PTmc1::Tmc1]; Tmc1∆/∆ positive control cochleae at P25 (Fig. 2). In Tg[Tmc1∆Ex8_9]; Tmc1∆/∆ negative control cochleae, inner HC stereocilia bundles showed evidence of early degeneration in the middle to basal turns and outer HC bundles were degenerating throughout the apical to basal turns, similar to Tmc1∆/∆ cochleae (Fig. 2). At earlier time points (P16), inner HC bundles remained intact, while outer HC bundles already showed evidence of degeneration in the middle to basal turns of Tmc1∆/∆ cochleae (Supplementary Fig. 2). In contrast, Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ cochleae had inner and outer HC stereocilia bundles which remained intact from apical to basal turns (Supplementary Fig. 2). These results suggest that expression of transgenic Tmc2 promotes preservation of hair bundle morphology and survival of inner and outer HCs in Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice.
Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] partially restores sensory transduction in Tmc1∆/∆ mice
Since transgenic Tmc2 expression promotes HC survival, we investigated the ability of Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] to substitute for endogenous Tmc1 and Tmc2 in Tmc1∆/∆; Tmc2∆/∆ cochlear HCs. We measured whole-cell sensory transduction currents in Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆; Tmc2∆/∆ mice at P6-P7. In apical and basal turns, the sensory transduction currents of Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆; Tmc2∆/∆ inner HCs were not significantly different from those of Tmc1+/∆; Tmc2∆/∆ inner HCs in which only endogenous Tmc1 is expressed (Fig. 3, paired t-test, P > 0.05). In contrast, sensory transduction current amplitudes of Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆; Tmc2∆/∆ outer HCs were significantly smaller than those of Tmc1+/∆; Tmc2∆/∆ outer HCs (Fig. 3, paired t-test, P < 0.01 at apical turn, P < 0.001 at basal turn). In vestibular type II HCs Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆; Tmc2∆/∆ mice had robust sensory transduction currents that were significantly larger than those of Tmc1+/∆; Tmc2∆/∆ HCs (Supplementary Fig. 3, paired t-test, P < 0.001). These results show that transgenic expression of Tmc2 can preserve sensory transduction currents in vestibular type II cells and cochlear inner HCs but only partially restores currents in cochlear outer HCs of postnatal Tmc1∆/∆; Tmc2∆/∆ mice during the first postnatal week.
To examine sensory transduction at later time points, we evaluated FM1-43 uptake in HCs. FM1-43 is a fluorescent styryl dye that can enter HCs through sensory transduction channels20,21. Absence of FM1-43 uptake reflects loss of functional sensory transduction channels. Consistent with our previous report14, FM1-43 uptake was not observed in Tmc1∆/∆ cochlear HCs at P12. In contrast, FM1-43 uptake was observed in both inner and outer HCs of Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ cochleae at P12 and P16 (Fig. 4). In inner HCs, the uptake gradually decreased with age and was limited at P25, while it remained detectable in outer HCs at all ages tested (Fig. 4A; n = 3 cochleae for each of the three founder lines examined). FM1-43 uptake was observed in inner and outer HCs at P25 of Tg[PTmc1::Tmc1]; Tmc1∆/∆ positive control cochleae at P25 (Fig. 4B), but not in Tg[Tmc1∆Ex8_9]; Tmc1∆/∆ negative control cochlear HCs at P12 (Fig. 4C). To quantify the FM1-43 images, we counted the number of fluorescent FM1-43-labeled HCs at P12, P16 and P25 for 200-µm sections of the cochlea and found that the numbers of FM1-43-positive outer HCs were not significantly different from those in wild-type cochleae between P12 and P25 (Fig. 4D, one-way ANOVA, P > 0.05), while the numbers of FM1-43-positive inner HCs declined significantly between P16 and P25 compared with those in wild-type cochleae (Fig. 4E, one-way ANOVA, P < 0.01 at P16, P < 0.001 at P25). To compare average FM1-43 intensity in inner HCs, we quantified the intensity of FM1-43 labeling in each cell and found that the average intensity in inner HCs of Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ cochleae is significantly smaller than that of Tg[PTmc1::Tmc1]; Tmc1∆/∆ cochleae at P16 (Supplementary Fig. 4, one-way ANOVA, P < 0.005). Taken together, these data indicate that expression of transgenic Tmc2 in mature Tmc1-deficient mice maintains FM1-43 uptake in outer HCs but not inner HCs, suggesting a loss of functional sensory transduction channels open at rest in inner HCs.
Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] partially restores hearing
To investigate whether expression of transgenic Tmc2 was capable of restoring hearing lost due to loss of endogenous Tmc1, we examined auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds in Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice in response to stimuli ranging from 8.0 to 32 kHz. These frequencies correspond to the apical (8.0 to 11.2 kHz), middle (16.0 to 22.4 kHz), and basal turns (32 kHz) of the cochlea. At P16, ABR thresholds were approximately 80 dB sound pressure level (SPL), which was significantly better than those of Tmc1∆/∆ mice (Fig. 5A, one-way ANOVA, P < 0.001) but significantly elevated in comparison to those of wild-type mice (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.001). The thresholds at all frequencies progressively increased with age until there were no detectable responses to 90 dB SPL stimuli at P25 (Fig. 5B). To investigate whether expression of transgenic Tmc2 was detrimental for auditory function, we crossed Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] mice with wild-type mice to generate Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1+/+ mice. Their mean ABR thresholds were not significantly different from those of wild-type mice at P16 and P30 (Fig. 5C, Student’s t-test, P > 0.05), thus ruling out a pathogenic effect of Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] expression on wild-type HCs. Hearing thresholds of Tg[PTmc1::Tmc1]; Tmc1∆/∆ (positive control) mice were not significantly different from those of wild-type mice at P16 and P30 (Fig. 5D, Student’s t-test, P > 0.05), indicating that the Tmc1 promoter in Tg[PTmc1::Tmc1] and, thus, Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] was functional. We could not detect any responses to 90 dB SPL stimuli at any frequency in Tg[Tmc1∆Ex8_9]; Tmc1∆/∆ (negative control) mice at P16 (Fig. 5E), indicating there was little or no functional expression of Tmc1 in Tg[Tmc1∆Ex8_9]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice. Taken together, these results indicated that transgenic Tmc2 expressed in juvenile cochlear HCs can slightly but significantly restore hearing at stimulus frequencies corresponding to the apical to middle turns of the cochlea but is unable to compensate for loss of endogenous Tmc1 by P25.
Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] fails to restore otoacoustic emissions in Tmc1∆/∆ mice
Since transgenic Tmc2 allowed for robust FM1-43 uptake in P16 outer HCs of Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice, we measured distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) to assay outer HC function at the system level. Normal DPOAEs are an indication of cochlear amplification and are required for normal auditory function. Using sound stimuli ranging from 11.2 to 44.8 kHz, we found that DPOAEs were undetectable in Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ and Tmc1∆/∆ mice (Fig. 6A). The mean DPOAE amplitudes of Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice were significantly smaller than those of wild-type mice (Fig. 6A, one-way ANOVA, P < 0.001) and not significantly different from those of Tmc1∆/∆ mice (Fig. 6A, one-way ANOVA, P > 0.05). The mean DPOAE amplitudes of Tg[PTmc1::Tmc1]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice were not significantly different from those of wild-type mice at P16 except for that measured in response to stimuli at 19.2 kHz (Fig. 6B, Student’s t-test, P > 0.05). The mean DPOAE amplitudes of Tg[Tmc1∆Ex8_9]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice were not significantly different from those of Tmc1∆/∆ mice (Fig. 6C, Student’s t-test, P > 0.05). These results indicate that expression of transgenic Tmc2 in mature Tmc1-deficient cochlear outer HCs did not restore cochlear amplification. The elevated ABR thresholds of Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice at P16 is likely to be partially due to loss of active amplifier function of cochlear outer HCs.
Secondary consequences of transgenic Tmc2 expression in Tmc1∆/∆ inner ears
Although transgenic Tmc2 provided partial recovery of sensory transduction, the recovery of auditory function was limited and transient. As such, we investigated several additional aspects that may be secondary consequences of disrupted Tmc1 and Tmc2 expression. To investigate whether a loss of the endocochlear potential contributed to the abnormal auditory function in Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice, we measured the endocochlear potential in normoxic conditions. The endocochlear potential of both Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ and Tmc1∆/∆ mice was ~70 mV, not significantly different from that of wild-type mice at P16 (Fig. 7A, one-way ANOVA, P > 0.05), indicating that loss of the auditory function of Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ cannot be attributed to changes in the endocochlear potential.
To investigate why DPOAEs were not restored in Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice, we evaluated expression of prestin7,8. Anti-prestin immunoreactivity was identified along the basolateral membranes of outer HCs from apical to basal turns of both Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ and Tmc1∆/∆ cochleae at P16 (Fig. 7B), indicating that loss of DPOAEs in Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ outer HCs cannot be attributed to loss of prestin expression.
Prior work showed that, during postnatal maturation, outer HCs fail to acquire a slow delayed rectifier outward potassium current, Ik,n, in Tmc1 mutant (deafness) mice19. The voltage-dependent potassium channel KCNQ4 is responsible for Ik,n and is expressed in outer HCs from approximately P6 onwards22. Consistent with these findings, KCNQ4 immunoreactivity was undetectable in Tmc1∆/∆ outer HCs at P25 (Fig. 8A). However, we detected prominent KCNQ4 immunoreactivity in Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ outer HCs that was similar to that of wild-type outer HCs (Fig. 8A). These findings indicate that transgenic Tmc2 preserves expression of KCNQ4 in cochlear outer HCs lacking Tmc1.
Finally, we asked if the auditory dysfunction in Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice may be due to incomplete inner HC maturation. It has previously been shown that inner HCs of Tmc1 mutant mice fail to acquire the Ca2+-activated outward potassium current Ik,f carried by BK channels19. Ik,f is first detectable at approximately P12 in wild-type mice and is required for normal inner HC function23,24. We detected immunoreactivity of the pore-forming subunit of BK channels, KCNMA1, as typical punctate staining at the neck of inner HCs25–27 in P16 and P25 wild-type mice (Fig. 8B). KCNMA1 immunoreactivity was not detected at either age in Tmc1∆/∆ mice, consistent with the finding that inner HCs failed to acquire Ik,f in Tmc1 mutant mice19. However, KCNMA1 was present in inner HCs of Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice at P16 but was not detected at P25, suggesting that Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ began to mature, but reverted to an immature phenotype. These results indicate that transgenic Tmc2 can substitute for endogenous Tmc1 for the initial acquisition, but not maintenance, of KCNMA1 expression and Ik,f in inner HCs.
Discussion
In this study, we sought to test the hypothesis that persistent Tmc2 expression could substitute for loss of Tmc1 expression in mature cochlear HCs in a mouse model of Tmc1-deficient deafness. Transgenic expression of Tmc2 in cochlear HCs transiently and partially restored ABR thresholds in Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice, indicating that Tmc2 can partially but not fully compensate for loss of Tmc1 in mature cochlear HCs. Cochlear HC structure and function in Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice were also incompletely restored.
Our experiments revealed different results in inner and outer HCs. In Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ inner HCs, FM1-43 uptake gradually decreased with age from P12, and was limited at P25. This result differs from that reported by Asai et al.28, who detected small but steady sensory transduction currents in inner HCs expressing TMC2 but not TMC1 at P25. The lack of uptake of FM1-43 in our experiments was confirmed in three cochleae for each of three founder lines of Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆, indicating this difference from the result in Asai et al.28 is reproducible. Since FM1-43 uptake depends on channels open at rest, it is possible that their open probability was reduced at P25 but at least some stimulus-evoked sensory transduction remained unaffected. Although FM1-43 slowly labels HCs through the conventional uptake by endocytosis29,30, the absence of FM1-43 uptake in Tg[Tmc1∆Ex8_9]; Tmc1∆/∆ negative control cochlear HCs indicates that the labeling of HCs by bathing cochleae with the dye was caused by FM1-43 entering through sensory transduction channels.
Immunoreactivity of KCNMA1, a pore forming subunit of the BK channel associated with Ik,f in mature inner HCs, was detected at P16, but disappeared by P25. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the inner HC stereocilia bundles remained intact from the apical to basal turns at P25. These results indicate that Tmc2 can preserve or prolong survival but cannot preserve function of mature inner HCs in Tmc1-deficient mice.
In Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ outer HCs, FM1-43 uptake was observed from P12 to P25. Although current amplitudes were reduced (Fig. 3), the FM1-43 data suggest that transgenic Tmc2 was sufficient for development and maintenance of functional sensory transduction in Tmc1-deficient outer HCs. In contrast, Tmc2 failed to restore distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) at P16 in Tmc1-deficient mice, indicating that the amplifier function of outer HCs was not restored. The reason for the loss of amplification remains unknown since three aspects known to be required for outer HC function remained intact: (1) expression of the motor protein prestin was not affected; (2) expression of KCNQ4, which mediates Ik,n in mature outer HCs, appeared normal at P16; and (3) the endocochlear potential was also normal at P16 in Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ cochleae. Finally, outer HC stereocilia bundles remained intact from the apical to basal turns at P16, but started degenerating in the basal turns by P25. We conclude that Tmc2 was unable to restore the primary function, amplification, or survival of mature cochlear outer HCs in Tmc1-deficient mice. Taken together, our results indicate different requirements of inner and outer HCs for TMC1 and TMC2 proteins and different functions of TMC1 and TMC2 in mature cochlear HCs.
Our results from Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] mice could have resulted from a loss of expression of Tmc2 or residual expression of functional Tmc1 from the Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] transgene. However, the results for negative control Tg[Tmc1∆Ex8_9]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice showed that residual Tmc1 was not expressed at functionally significant levels from the Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] transgene, which was derived from the same Tg[Tmc1∆Ex8_9] BAC. The results for the positive control Tg[PTmc1::Tmc1]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice showed that the inserted cDNA was expressed at functionally significant levels under the control of the Tmc1 promoter in the same Tg[Tmc1∆Ex8_9] BAC used to construct Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]. These results indicate that partial restoration of function in Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice is unlikely to be due to residual Tmc1 expression or inadequate expression of Tmc2 from the BAC transgene. Although we could not directly confirm TMC2 protein expression in cochlear HCs due to difficulty in detecting low levels of protein, the restoration of sensory transduction in Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆; Tmc2∆/∆ HCs indicates that functional TMC2 was expressed from the Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] allele.
Why then does TMC2 not fully compensate for loss of TMC1 in mature cochlear HCs? One possible explanation is that TMC1 and TMC2 have different requirements for interacting molecules in mature cochlear HCs. For example, neither TMC1 nor TMC2 binds directly to LHFPL5, but TMC2 and not TMC1 is localized normally to the stereocilia of Lhfpl5∆/∆ HCs31. Thus, the inability of TMC2 to fully substitute for TMC1 may be due to differences in its ability to bind to the correct partners and localize properly at the tips of hair bundle stereocilia.
Another possible explanation for our results is that core properties of the sensory transduction channel, such as single channel conductance and calcium permeability, vary according to the presence of TMC1 or TMC217,32. The properties associated with TMC1, but not TMC2, may be required for the function and survival of mature cochlear HCs. Similarly, another uncharacterized property or function specific to TMC1, but not TMC2, may be required for mature cochlear HC function and survival. One or more of these explanations may account for our current results.
Published studies of the Beethoven mouse, which segregates a semi-dominant gain-of-function allele of Tmc1 (Tmc1Bth), provide additional insight into the differential requirements of inner and outer HCs for TMC proteins8,13,17. Heterozygous Beethoven mice (Tmc1Bth/+) have delayed onset, progressive HL13. On the C3HeB/FeJ strain background, Tmc1Bth/+ inner HC stereocilia bundles degenerate, whereas outer HC stereocilia bundles remained intact at 4 weeks of age33. That observation might reflect differing requirements between inner and outer HCs for TMC1/2 for their function and survival. Alternatively, it might reflect differential sensitivity of inner HCs to the gain-of-function effects of the TMC1Bth protein17. Furthermore, the DPOAE amplitudes of C3HeB/FeJ-Tmc1Bth/+ mice were significantly higher than those of their hybrid Tmc1Bth/+ offspring of outcrosses to DBA/2J or C57BL/6J mice33. We used this background-strain dependent preservation of DPOAE amplitudes and outer HC stereocilia bundles in Tmc1Bth/+ to map modifier loci to chromosomes 2, 5, 11, and 12. The Tmc1m1 modifier interval on chromosome 2 includes Tmc2, raising the possibility that strain-dependent differences in levels of Tmc2 expression could account for the modifier effect33 of alleles at Tmc1m1 on outer HC function and survival. Finally, the Tg[PTmc1::Tmc1]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice in our current study were studied on a C57BL6/J background, suggesting that the loss of amplifier function and failure of cochlear outer HCs to survive might have been less severe or even eliminated on a C3HeB/FeJ background.
In conclusion, transgenic expression of Tmc2 in mature cochlear HCs partially restored cochlear HC and auditory function in a Tmc1-deficient mouse model of DFNB7/B11 deafness. Tmc1 and Tmc2 have related but distinct roles in cochlear HCs, and the requirement for Tmc1 and Tmc2 differs between inner and outer HCs.
Methods
Quantitative RT-PCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted from cochleae or vestibules of C57BL/6J mice or Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2]; Tmc1∆/∆ mice using PicoPure RNA Isolation Kit (Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA). Total RNA was reverse-transcribed with the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Life Technologies). We designed amplification primers specific to Actb, Tmc1, transgenic and endogenous Tmc2, transgenic Tmc2 or endogenous Tmc2 cDNA with a ZEN double-quenched probe containing a 5′ FAM fluorophore, a 3′ IBFQ quencher and an internal ZEN quencher (IDT, Coralville, IA, USA; Supplementary Table 1, Fig. 1A). Comparative TaqMan assay was performed using TaqMan Fast Universal PCR Master Mix (Life Technologies) on a ViiA7 Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies). Each sample was analyzed three times. Relative expression was normalized to the level of actin cytoplasmic 1 (encoded by Actb) and calculated using the ΔΔCt method34.
Bacterial artificial chromosome transgenic mice
BAC clone MSMg01-526L10 (181,748 bp, Riken Bioresource Center DNA Bank, Tsukuba, Japan), encoding wild-type MSM/Ms mouse genomic Tmc1 (170,745 bp)35 was used to construct Tg[Tmc1∆Ex8_9], Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] or Tg[PTmc1::Tmc1] using the Counter-Selection BAC Modification Kit with Red/ET recombination technology (Gene Bridges, Heidelberg, Germany, Fig. 1A). To construct Tg[Tmc1∆Ex8_9], we deleted 2775 bp including exons 8 and 9 using the same method. This deleted region is identical to that deleted in Tmc1∆/∆ mice14. To construct Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2] or Tg[PTmc1::Tmc1], we modified Tg[Tmc1∆Ex8_9] to replace the translation initiation codon of Tmc1 with the Tmc1 (NM_028953.2) or Tmc2 cDNA (NM_138655.1) conjugated with the SV40 polyadenylation signal, respectively. Mouse cochleae and vestibular organs express two Tmc1 isoforms, Tmc1Ex1 and Tmc1Ex2, which encode transcripts excluding or including exon 2, and utilize a different translation initiation codon in exon 1 or 2, respectively14. Since Tmc1Ex1 can restore MET in Tmc1∆/∆; Tmc2∆/∆ cochlear HCs, we replaced the translation initiation codon of Tmc1Ex1 with cDNA encoding Tmc1Ex1 or Tmc2. Modified BACs were purified and injected into C57BL/6J mouse eggs at the University of Michigan Transgenic Animal Model Core Facility. Founder mice from each BAC construct were backcrossed onto Tmc1∆/∆ or Tmc1∆/∆; Tmc2∆/∆ mice on a congenic C57BL/6J background.
Genotype analysis
Genomic DNA was extracted from tail clips using the Maxwell 16 System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). PCR was performed with Taq DNA polymerase (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA) and specific primer sets (Supplementary Table 2) to detect the presence of the transgenes. For Tmc1∆ genotype analysis, we designed amplification primers specific to the Tmc1 wild-type allele or the Tmc1∆ allele (Supplementary Table 3). These primers do not recognize the modified BACs Tg[PTmc1::Tmc2], Tg[PTmc1::Tmc1] or Tg[Tmc1∆Ex8_9].
Scanning electron microscopy
Samples were prepared from mouse cochleae using the OTOTO method36 with some modifications14. Essentially, mouse otic capsules were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde buffered with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (Electron Microscopy Science, Hatfield, PA, USA) containing 2 mM CaCl2 and 100 mM sucrose for 1.5 hours at 4 °C. Following washes, samples were post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide buffered with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer containing 2 mM CaCl2. After cochleae were micro-dissected in 70% ethanol, tissues were gradually hydrated with distilled water. Samples were incubated in a saturated concentration of thiocarbohydrazide for 20 minutes at RT and then washed six times with distilled water. This procedure was repeated twice. The tissues were dehydrated by stepwise incubation in a graded series of increasing concentrations of ethanol, critical point dried, and imaged with an S-4800 Field Emission Scanning Microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), at 5-kV acceleration voltage.
Electrophysiology
Mouse cochlear tissues were harvested at P6-7 and mechanotransduction currents were recorded from outer HCs and inner HCs. The organs of Corti were bathed in standard artificial perilymph containing 137 mM NaCl, 0.7 mM NaH2PO4, 5.8 mM KCl, 1.3 mM CaCl2, 0.9 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, and 5.6 mM D-glucose. Vitamins (1:50) and amino acids (1:100) were added to the solution from concentrates (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and NaOH was used to adjust the final pH to 7.40 (~310 mOsm/kg). Recording pipettes with resistance of 2–3 MΩ were pulled from R6 capillary glass (King Precision Glass, Claremont, CA, USA). Cs+ solution containing 135 mM CsCl, 5 mM HEPES, 5 mM EGTA, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 2.5 mM Na2-ATP, and 0.1 mM CaCl2 was used as intracellular solution, CsOH was used to adjust the final pH to 7.40 (~285 mOsm/kg). Whole-cell, tight-seal, voltage-clamp recordings were performed at −84 mV and 22–24 °C with an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). Hair bundles were deflected with a stiff glass probe with a rounded tip of ~3–5 µm in diameter. The glass probe was mounted on a piezoelectric actuator driven by an LVPZT amplifier (E-500.00, Physik Instrumente, Karlsruhe, Germany). The data were filtered at 10 kHz with a low-pass Bessel filter and digitized at >20 kHz with a 16-bit acquisition board (Digidata 1440 A, Molecular Devices) and pClamp 10 software (Molecular Devices).
FM1-43 uptake
Mouse otic capsule was harvested and placed in Leibovitz’s L-15 Medium (Life Technologies). FM1-43 FX (Life Technologies), a fixable analog of N-(3-triethylammoniumpropyl)-4-(4-(dibutylamino) styryl) pyridinium dibromide, was applied at 5 µM by local perfusion through oval and round windows for 1 minute at room temperature (RT). After three washes with Leibovitz’s L-15 medium, the tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4 °C. The organ of Corti was microdissected from the cochlea and counterstained with Alexa Fluor 568 phalloidin (Life Technologies) diluted 1:500. Tissues were mounted with Prolong Gold Antifade without DAPI (Life Technologies) and visualized with an LMS 780 confocal microscope equipped with ZEN 2012 software (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
Auditory brainstem response testing
Auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds were measured in both ears as described previously37. Mice were anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine (56 µg/g) and dexmedetomidine (0.375 µg/g). During the procedure, mice were placed on a heating pad. Eight-, 11.2-, 16-, 22.4- or 32-kHz tone-bursts stimulus of 3-ms duration were delivered at 29.9 Hz. Supra-thresholds stimulus intensities were initially decreased in 10-dB steps, followed by 5-dB steps at lower intensities to determine the thresholds. When no ABR waveform was detectable at the highest intensity level of 90 dB SPL, the threshold was considered to be 95 dB SPL for subsequent analysis.
Distortion-product otoacoustic emission testing
Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were recorded in both ears as described previously37 while the mice were anesthetized for measurement of ABR thresholds. DPOAE levels were obtained in response to two primary tones with frequency ratio f2/f1 = 1.25 and intensity levels f1 = 65 and f2 = 55 dB SPL which was varied in one-fifth-octave steps from 4 to 44.8 kHz.
Endocochlear potential measurement
The endocochlear potential was measured in right ears as described previously38–40. Mice were anesthetized with tribromoethanol (350 µg/g) and placed on a heating pad. The endocochlear potential was measured using glass microelectrodes consisting of tips of glass pipettes and silver/chloride electrodes. Glass microelectrodes were prepared using a P-97 Flaming/Brown Micropipette Puller (Sutter Instrument, Novato, CA, USA)41. The endocochlear potential was measured in the basal turn of the cochlea by a round-window approach through the basilar membrane. Data were recorded by Digidata 1440 A and AxoScope 10 (Molecular Devices) and analyzed by Clampfit 10 (Molecular Devices).
Immunohistochemistry
Mouse otic capsules were fixed in 4.0% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 30 minutes at RT. After a 30-minute permeabilization with 0.1% saponin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), tissues were incubated with blocking solution (2% fetal bovine serum, 5% goat serum and 0.05% saponin in PBS) for 1 hour. Samples were then incubated with primary antibodies in the blocking solution overnight at 4 °C. Following five washes with 0.05% saponin, samples were incubated with secondary antibodies in the blocking solution for 1 hour at RT. After four washes with 0.05% saponin, tissues were washed one time in PBS, and mounted with Prolong Gold Antifade Mountant (Life Technologies). Samples were visualized with an LMS 780 confocal microscope equipped with ZEN 2012 software (Carl Zeiss). The following antibodies were used: goat anti-prestin (1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA, sc-22692), rabbit anti-myosin-VIIa (1:200; Proteus BioSciences, Ramona, CA, USA, 25–6790), rabbit anti-KCNMA1 (1:100; Sigma-Aldrich, P8357), mouse anti-parvalbumin (1:500, Swant, Bellinzona, Switzerland, 235), rabbit anti-KCNQ442,43 and Alexa Fluor 488- or 568-conjugated secondary antibodies (Life Technologies).
Statistics
Statistical analyses included paired t-test, unpaired Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA. p < 0.05 was considered to be significant.
Study approval
All animal experiments and procedures adhered to protocols approved by the joint Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders or by the Animal Care and Use Committee at Boston Children’s Hospital (Protocol #3396).
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We thank the Transgenic Animal Model Core of the University of Michigan’s Biomedical Research Core Facilities for preparation of transgenic mice, the Animal Care and Use Committee of NINDS/NIDCD for animal care, NIDCD colleagues for advice and discussion, and Thomas Friedman, Katie Kindt, and Isabelle Roux for critical review of this manuscript. Work in the authors’ laboratories was supported by NIH/NIDCD R01-DC008853 (to G.S.G.), R01-DC013521 (to J.R.H.) and NIH Intramural Research Funds Z01-DC000060 (to A.J.G.) and Z01-DC000080 (to T.S.F.).
Author Contributions
H.N., K.K., J.R.H., and A.J.G. designed research; H.N., B.P., and T.S.F. performed research; H.N., B.P., P.W. and J.R.H., and A.J.G. analyzed data; and H.N., G.S.G., J.R.H. and A.J.G. wrote the paper.
Competing Interests
K.K. and A.J.G. hold patents related to Tmc1 and Tmc2 and receive royalties from EMD Millipore for anti-Tmc1 antibodies. G.S.G. and J.R.H. hold patents related to Tmc1 gene therapy. J.R.H. is a scientific advisor for Frequency Therapeutics and Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation.
Footnotes
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-29709-8.
References
- 1.Dannhof BJ, Bruns V. The innervation of the organ of Corti in the rat. Hear Res. 1993;66:8–22. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90255-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hafidi A. Peripherin-like immunoreactivity in type II spiral ganglion cell body and projections. Brain Res. 1998;805:181–190. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00448-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Perkins RE, Morest DK. A study of cochlear innervation patterns in cats and rats with the Golgi method and Nomarkski Optics. J Comp Neurol. 1975;163:129–158. doi: 10.1002/cne.901630202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ginzberg RD, Morest DK. A study of cochlear innervation in the young cat with the Golgi method. Hear Res. 1983;10:227–246. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(83)90056-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ashmore JF. A fast motile response in guinea-pig outer hair cells: the cellular basis of the cochlear amplifier. J Physiol. 1987;388:323–347. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kachar B, Brownell WE, Altschuler R, Fex J. Electrokinetic shape changes of cochlear outer hair cells. Nature. 1986;322:365–368. doi: 10.1038/322365a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zheng J, et al. Prestin is the motor protein of cochlear outer hair cells. Nature. 2000;405:149–155. doi: 10.1038/35012009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Oliver D, et al. Intracellular anions as the voltage sensor of prestin, the outer hair cell motor protein. Science. 2001;292:2340–2343. doi: 10.1126/science.1060939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Peng AW, Salles FT, Pan B, Ricci AJ. Integrating the biophysical and molecular mechanisms of auditory hair cell mechanotransduction. Nat Commun. 2011;2:523. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dallos, P. Overview: Cochlear Neurobiology. In: Dallos, P., Popper, A. N. & Fay, R. R. (eds). The Cochlea. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, vol 8. Springer: New York, NY, USA, pp 1–43, 1996.
- 11.Wangemann, P. & Schacht, J. Homeostatic Mechanisms in the Cochlea. In: Dallos, P., Popper, A. N. & Fay, R. R. (eds). The Cochlea. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, vol 8. Springer: New York, NY, USA, pp 130–185, 1996.
- 12.Kurima K, et al. Dominant and recessive deafness caused by mutations of a novel gene, TMC1, required for cochlear hair-cell function. Nat Genet. 2002;30:277–284. doi: 10.1038/ng842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Vreugde S, et al. Beethoven, a mouse model for dominant, progressive hearing loss DFNA36. Nat Genet. 2002;30:257–258. doi: 10.1038/ng848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kawashima Y, et al. Mechanotransduction in mouse inner ear hair cells requires transmembrane channel-like genes. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:4796–4809. doi: 10.1172/JCI60405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pennacchio LA. Insights from human/mouse genome comparisons. Mamm Genome. 2003;14:429–436. doi: 10.1007/s00335-002-4001-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kurima K, et al. TMC1 and TMC2 Localize at the Site of Mechanotransduction in Mammalian Inner Ear Hair Cell Stereocilia. Cell Rep. 2015;12:1606–1617. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pan B, et al. TMC1 and TMC2 are components of the mechanotransduction channel in hair cells of the mammalian inner ear. Neuron. 2013;79:504–515. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Corns LF, Johnson SL, Kros CJ, Marcotti W. Tmc1 Point Mutation Affects Ca2+ Sensitivity and Block by Dihydrostreptomycin of the Mechanoelectrical Transducer Current of Mouse Outer Hair Cells. J Neurosci. 2016;36:336–349. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2439-15.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Marcotti W, Erven A, Johnson SL, Steel KP, Kros CJ. Tmc1 is necessary for normal functional maturation and survival of inner and outer hair cells in the mouse cochlea. J Physiol. 2006;574:677–698. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.095661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gale JE, Marcotti W, Kennedy HJ, Kros CJ, Richardson GP. FM1-43 dye behaves as a permeant blocker of the hair-cell mechanotransducer channel. J Neurosci. 2001;21:7013–7025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-18-07013.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Meyers JR, et al. Lighting up the senses: FM1-43 loading of sensory cells through nonselective ion channels. J Neurosci. 2003;23:4054–4065. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-10-04054.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Winter H, et al. Thyroid hormone receptors TRalpha1 and TRbeta differentially regulate gene expression of Kcnq4 and prestin during final differentiation of outer hair cells. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:2975–2984. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kros CJ, Ruppersberg JP, Rusch A. Expression of a potassium current in inner hair cells during development of hearing in mice. Nature. 1998;394:281–284. doi: 10.1038/28401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Marcotti W, Johnson SL, Holley MC, Kros CJ. Developmental changes in the expression of potassium currents of embryonic, neonatal and mature mouse inner hair cells. J Physiol. 2003;548:383–400. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.034801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pyott SJ, Glowatzki E, Trimmer JS, Aldrich RW. Extrasynaptic localization of inactivating calcium-activated potassium channels in mouse inner hair cells. J Neurosci. 2004;24:9469–9474. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3162-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hafidi A, Beurg M, Dulon D. Localization and developmental expression of BK channels in mammalian cochlear hair cells. Neuroscience. 2005;130:475–484. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.09.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nemzou NR, Bulankina AV, Khimich D, Giese A, Moser T. Synaptic organization in cochlear inner hair cells deficient for the CaV1.3 (alpha1D) subunit of L-type Ca2+ channels. Neuroscience. 2006;141:1849–1860. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.05.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Asai, Y. et al. Transgenic TMC2 expression preserves inner ear hair cells and vestibular function in mice lacking TMC1. Sci. Rep.8 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 29.Betz WJ, Mao F, Smith CB. Imaging exocytosis and endocytosis. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1996;6:365–371. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(96)80121-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cochilla AJ, Angleson JK, Betz WJ. Monitoring secretory membrane with FM1-43 fluorescence. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22:1–10. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Beurg M, Xiong W, Zhao B, Muller U, Fettiplace R. Subunit determination of the conductance of hair-cell mechanotransducer channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:1589–1594. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1420906112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Corns LF, Jeng JY, Richardson GP, Kros CJ, Marcotti W. TMC2 Modifies Permeation Properties of the Mechanoelectrical Transducer Channel in Early Postnatal Mouse Cochlear Outer Hair Cells. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017;10:326. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Noguchi Y, et al. Multiple quantitative trait loci modify cochlear hair cell degeneration in the Beethoven (Tmc1Bth) mouse model of progressive hearing loss DFNA36. Genetics. 2006;173:2111–2119. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.057372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kurima K, et al. A noncoding point mutation of Zeb1 causes multiple developmental malformations and obesity in Twirler mice. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Abe K, et al. Contribution of Asian mouse subspecies Mus musculus molossinus to genomic constitution of strain C57BL/6J, as defined by BAC-end sequence-SNP analysis. Genome Res. 2004;14:2439–2447. doi: 10.1101/gr.2899304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hunter-Duvar IM. A technique for preparation of cochlear specimens for assessment with the scanning electron microscope. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1978;351:3–23. doi: 10.3109/00016487809122718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Morozko EL, et al. ILDR1 null mice, a model of human deafness DFNB42, show structural aberrations of tricellular tight junctions and degeneration of auditory hair cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:609–624. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wangemann P, et al. Loss of KCNJ10 protein expression abolishes endocochlear potential and causes deafness in Pendred syndrome mouse model. BMC Med. 2004;2:30. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-2-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wangemann P, et al. Loss of cochlear HCO3- secretion causes deafness via endolymphatic acidification and inhibition of Ca2+ reabsorption in a Pendred syndrome mouse model. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2007;292:F1345–1353. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00487.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ito T, et al. Slc26a4-insufficiency causes fluctuating hearing loss and stria vascularis dysfunction. Neurobiol Dis. 2014;66:53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Noben-Trauth K, Latoche JR, Neely HR, Bennett B. Phenotype and genetics of progressive sensorineural hearing loss (Snhl1) in the LXS set of recombinant inbred strains of mice. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Beisel KW, et al. Differential expression of KCNQ4 in inner hair cells and sensory neurons is the basis of progressive high-frequency hearing loss. J Neurosci. 2005;25:9285–9293. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2110-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sousa AD, et al. The septate junction protein caspr is required for structural support and retention of KCNQ4 at calyceal synapses of vestibular hair cells. J Neurosci. 2009;29:3103–3108. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4868-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.