Table 2.
Implementation outcomes indicators.
| Implementation outcomea and indicator | 4 months | 12 months | |||
| Adoption |
|
|
|||
|
|
Number of clinicians having decided to use Medly to monitor patients | 3 | 8 | ||
| Penetration |
|
|
|||
|
|
Percentage of clinicians using Medly over the total number of potential clinician users in the Ted Rogers Centre of Excellence for Heart Function | 38 | 89 | ||
| Feasibility |
|
|
|||
|
|
Cumulative number of patients enrolled in the Medly program | 42 | 98 | ||
| Cumulative number of patients removed from the Medly program for clinical reasons (eg, received a heart transplant) | 0 | 8 | |||
| Cumulative number of patients having chosen to leave the Medly program | 0 | 5 | |||
| Number of deaths (all unrelated to the program) | 1 | 5 | |||
| Fidelity |
|
|
|||
|
|
Cumulative number of calls or emails made to the telehealth analyst for technical assistance | 56 | 195 | ||
| Cumulative number of requests for changes to the Medly technology | 15 | 72 | |||
aImplementation outcomes are defined in the framework by Proctor et al [21].