Table 2.
Correlates of intervention uptake.
Characteristica | Dependent variable (tried intervention) | P value |
Age, beta (SE) | −.04 (.02) | .06 |
Married or in a union, beta (SE) | −.16 (.20) | .44 |
Identifies as Christian, beta (SE) | .44 (.33) | .20 |
Identifies as a member of Luhya tribe, beta (SE) | −.01 (.18) | .97 |
Attended postsecondary schooling, beta (SE) | .20 (.17) | .25 |
Nulligravida, beta (SE) | .09 (.24) | .71 |
Number of children born, beta (SE) | .04 (.10) | .65 |
Desired number of children, beta (SE) | .06 (.09) | .47 |
Has unmet need for spacing, beta (SE) | −.03 (.24) | .91 |
Past use of family planning, beta (SE) | −.26 (.17) | .14 |
Number of methods known, beta (SE) | .01 (.03) | .75 |
Not exposed to family planning messages, beta (SE) | −.19 (.20) | .35 |
Constant, beta (SE) | .71 (.58) | .23 |
Mean of dependent variable | .34 | N/Ac |
Observations | 56 | N/A |
R 2 | .28 | N/A |
Adjusted R2 | .08 | N/A |
Residual SE | .4643 | N/A |
F statistic | 1.4012,43 | N/A |
aSample limited to women randomly assigned to the treatment group.
bCoefficients estimated through linear probability model regression.
cN/A: not applicable.