Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 31;20(7):e10756. doi: 10.2196/10756

Table 2.

Correlates of intervention uptake.

Characteristica Dependent variable (tried intervention) P value
Age, beta (SE) −.04 (.02) .06
Married or in a union, beta (SE) −.16 (.20) .44
Identifies as Christian, beta (SE) .44 (.33) .20
Identifies as a member of Luhya tribe, beta (SE) −.01 (.18) .97
Attended postsecondary schooling, beta (SE) .20 (.17) .25
Nulligravida, beta (SE) .09 (.24) .71
Number of children born, beta (SE) .04 (.10) .65
Desired number of children, beta (SE) .06 (.09) .47
Has unmet need for spacing, beta (SE) −.03 (.24) .91
Past use of family planning, beta (SE) −.26 (.17) .14
Number of methods known, beta (SE) .01 (.03) .75
Not exposed to family planning messages, beta (SE) −.19 (.20) .35
Constant, beta (SE) .71 (.58) .23
Mean of dependent variable .34 N/Ac
Observations 56 N/A
R 2 .28 N/A
Adjusted R2 .08 N/A
Residual SE .4643 N/A
F statistic 1.4012,43 N/A

aSample limited to women randomly assigned to the treatment group.

bCoefficients estimated through linear probability model regression.

cN/A: not applicable.