Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 14;18:198. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0879-y

Table 4.

Relationship between Refractive error regression after PRK Surgery and preoperative variables in people with both eyes regressed and both eyes non-regressed

Variables People whose both eyes were non regressed after surgery People whose both eyes were regressed after surgery
Right eye
N = 107
Left eye
N = 107
Test Right eye
N = 20
Left eye
N = 20
Test
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD P value§ Mead(min-max) Mead(min-max) P value®
Thickness (μm) 536.7 ± 32.6 537.6 ± 34.7 0.84 537.5 (499–572) 531 (501–575) 0.49
Irregularity5(mm) 1.33 ± 0.31 1.36 ± 0.38 0.55 1.35 (1.00–2.70) 1.25 (0.9–2.6) 0.45
Astigmatism(D) 0.99 ± 0.70 1.07 ± 0.73 0.43 1.62 (0–3.75) 1.87 (0–4.25) 0.43
Sphere (D) 3.17 ± 1.69 3.12 ± 1.70 0.84 6.25 (0.25–12) 7.87 (0–11.50) 0.41
SimK (D) 0.97 ± 0.49 1.04 ± 0.51 0.30 1.25 (0.25–2.90) 1.50 (0.50–2.90) 0.92

PRK Photorefractive keratectomy, Sim k astigmatism: simulated keratometry astigmatism, P value: §: Independent sample t. test ®; Mann –Whitney U independent sample test