Table 3.
Results of granger causality tests and regression analyses between legacy (vs. Social) media, risk perceptions, and protective behaviors in different populations – by pregnancy status, Zika infection risk, income, education level, age, and ethnicity.
| Demographic variable | Legacy media |
Social media |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granger causality test F-value, p-value | Unstandardized coefficient | Standard error | 95% CI | Adjusted R2 | p-value | Granger causality test F-value, p-value | Unstandardized coefficient | Standard error | 95% CI | Adjusted R2 | p-value | |
| Risk perceptions | ||||||||||||
| Pregnancy statusa | ||||||||||||
| Households with current/intended pregnancy | 0.01, .909 | −0.23 | 0.38 | −1.06 to 0.59 | .06 | .284 | 9.02, .010 | 0.54 | 0.22 | 0.07 to 1.02 | .38 | .029 |
| Households without current/intended pregnancy | 5.14, .041 | 0.43 | 0.24 | −0.10 to 0.97 | .54 | .006 | 32.99, < .001 | 0.59 | 0.11 | 0.34 to 0.84 | .82 | <.001 |
| Geographic regionsb | ||||||||||||
| High-risk | 1.40, .258 | 0.23 | 0.23 | −0.26 to 0.73 | .54 | .005 | 27.54, < .001 | 0.53 | 0.11 | 0.29 to 0.76 | .84 | <.001 |
| Low-risk | 7.03, .012* |
0.69g −0.34h |
0.23g 0.23h |
0.16 to 1.23g −0.90 to 0.20h |
.52 | .052 | 3.18, .098 | 0.36 | 0.22 | −0.13 to 0.85 | .14 | .179 |
| Incomec | ||||||||||||
| Low income | 3.00, .107 | 0.30 | 0.26 | −0.26 to 0.87 | .49 | .009 | 27.40, < .001 | 0.55 | 0.12 | 0.29 to 0.81 | .81 | <.001 |
| High income | 4.18, .062 | 0.50 | 0.27 | −0.10 to 1.11 | .48 | .012 | 16.62, .001 | 0.57 | 0.15 | 0.23 to 0.90 | .70 | .001 |
| Education leveld | ||||||||||||
| Less educated | 6.88, .021 | 0.62 | 0.24 | 0.09 to 1.16 | .54 | .006 | 11.73, .005 | 0.53 | 0.17 | 0.15 to 0.91 | .60 | .003 |
| More educated | 0.62, .447 | 0.11 | 0.27 | −0.49 to 0.71 | .38 | .030 | 26.83, < .001 | 0.56 | 0.12 | 0.29 to 0.82 | .79 | <.001 |
| Agee | ||||||||||||
| Young adults | 6.55, .024 | 0.59 | 0.24 | 0.05 to 1.12 | .30 | .056 | 6.16, .027 | 0.52 | 0.22 | 0.04 to 0.99 | .30 | .057 |
| Adults | 4.95, .045 | 0.46 | 0.25 | −0.08 to 1.01 | .57 | .004 | 29.00, < .001 | 0.56 | 0.12 | 0.30 to 0.82 | .82 | <.001 |
| Seniors | 3.53, .083 | 0.48 | 0.32 | −0.23 to 1.20 | .18 | .131 | 14.21, .002 | 0.63 | 0.19 | 0.21 to 1.04 | .51 | .008 |
| Ethnicityf | ||||||||||||
| Whites | 3.99, .067 | 0.42 | 0.26 | −0.16 to 1.00 | .42 | .019 | 38.75, < .001 | 0.63 | 0.11 | 0.38 to 0.88 | .81 | <.001 |
| Blacks | 4.00, .067 | 0.47 | 0.32 | −0.23 to 1.18 | .26 | .078 | 1.95, .186 | 0.27 | 0.23 | −0.23 to 0.77 | .21 | .111 |
| Hispanics | 7.33, .018 | 0.56 | 0.22 | 0.08 to 1.05 | .49 | .010 | 6.05, .029 | 0.47 | 0.21 | 0.01 to 0.94 | .44 | .016 |
| ‘Other’ ethnicities |
0.35, .563 |
0.32 |
0.29 |
−0.32 to 0.95 |
.03 |
.330 |
3.93, .055* |
0.69g 0.27h |
0.23g 0.24h |
0.15 to 1.23g −0.30–0.85h |
.66 |
.018 |
| Protective behaviors | ||||||||||||
| Pregnancy statusa | ||||||||||||
| Households with current/intended pregnancy | 6.66, .017 | 0.30 | 0.12 | 0.06 to 0.54 | .20 | .039 | 8.84, .001ˆ | 0.10g −0.04h 0.58i |
0.12g 0.16h 0.14i |
−0.16–0.36g −0.37 to 0.29h 0.27 to 0.88i |
.62 | .001 |
| Households without current/intended pregnancy | 2.51, .128 | 0.24 | 0.15 | −0.07 to 0.55 | .05 | .215 | 2.39, .137 | 0.21 | 0.14 | −0.07 to 0.50 | .05 | .228 |
| Geographic regionsb | ||||||||||||
| High-risk | 10.13, .004 | 0.40 | 0.12 | 0.14 to 0.66 | .42 | .001 | 3.76, .066 | 0.26 | 0.14 | −0.02 to 0.54 | .27 | .014 |
| Low-risk | 0.37, .548 | 0.08 | 0.13 | −0.19 to 0.36 | -.08 | .831 | 3.08, .094 | 0.21 | 0.12 | −0.04 to 0.46 | .04 | .238 |
| Incomec | ||||||||||||
| Low-income | 4.66, .023* | 0.24g 0.27h |
0.13g 0.14h |
−0.03–0.50g −0.02–0.57h |
.31 | .028 | 2.83, .107 | 0.21 | 0.12 | −0.05 to 0.47 | .11 | .118 |
| High-income | 1.65, .213 | 0.19 | 0.15 | −0.12 to 0.50 | .03 | .267 | 3.30, .083 | 0.25 | 0.14 | −0.04 to 0.54 | .10 | .128 |
| Education leveld | ||||||||||||
| Less-educated | 6.72, .017 | 0.32 | 0.12 | 0.06 to 0.57 | .17 | .054 | 1.00, .329 | 0.13 | 0.13 | −0.14 to 0.41 | -.05 | .614 |
| More-educated | 1.90, .183 | 0.20 | 0.15 | −0.10 to 0.51 | .12 | .096 | 3.47, .076 | 0.26 | 0.14 | −0.03 to 0.54 | .18 | .048 |
| Agee | ||||||||||||
| Young adults | 4.19, .053 | 0.26 | 0.13 | −0.00 to 0.52 | .13 | .090 | 0.14, .716 | 0.05 | 0.14 | −0.23 to 0.33 | -.04 | .571 |
| Adults | 2.94, .101 | 0.27 | 0.15 | −0.06 to 0.59 | .09 | .149 | 3.19, .089 | 0.27 | 0.15 | −0.04 to 0.58 | .10 | .134 |
| Seniors | 1.01, .326 | 0.12 | 0.12 | −0.13 to 0.38 | .03 | .277 | 2.46, .132 | 0.19 | 0.12 | −0.06 to 0.43 | .09 | .142 |
| Ethnicityf | ||||||||||||
| Whites | 3.50, .052* |
0.32g 0.09h |
0.14g 0.15h |
0.02 to 0.62g −0.23–0.40h |
.23 | .065 | 2.48, .130 | 0.21 | 0.13 | −0.07 to 0.48 | .03 | .269 |
| Blacks | 2.56, .125 | 0.22 | 0.14 | −0.07 to 0.51 | .06 | .200 | 2.32, .143 | 0.21 | 0.14 | −0.08 to 0.50 | .05 | .223 |
| Hispanics | 5.14, .034 | 0.33 | 0.15 | 0.03 to 0.64 | .22 | .027 | 0.45, .510 | 0.11 | 0.16 | −0.23 to 0.45 | .05 | .218 |
| ‘Other’ ethnicities | 3.60, .039ˆ |
0.29g −0.35h 0.43i |
0.14g 0.15h 0.16i |
0.00 to 0.58g −0.66 to -0.04h 0.08 to 0.77i |
.39 | .030 | 4.85, .039 | 0.31 | 0.14 | 0.02 to 0.60 | .18 | .048 |
Note.
Absence of a symbol specification refers to a lag length 1, an asterisk refers to a lag length 2, and a caret refers to a lag length 3, the bold font style indicates the results were of a significance level of p-values ≤ .05.
Pregnancy status: Respondents who answered “yes” to questions either about current or intended pregnancy in the next twelve months were grouped to the households with current/intended pregnancy whereas those who answered “no” to these questions were coded as households without current/intended pregnancy.
Geographic regions: The state-level laboratory-confirmed symptomatic Zika virus disease cases and presumptive viremic blood donors reported to ArboNET were collected from the CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/Zika/geo/united-states.html. We identified Florida, New York, California, and Texas as geographic regions with high-risk because they contained over 50% of the reported cases in the United States. Respondents from these states were coded as from high-risk region, and the rest as from a low-risk region.
Income: The median household income (i.e., US$55,775), reported in the 2015 American Community Survey was used as a threshold to identify high- and low-income populations. Using the answers of a question about household income (1 = Less than $15,000 to 15 = $250,000 or more), we divided respondents into the high-income group if an option 7 (i.e., $75,000 but less than $100,000) or higher was chosen, and those who selected an option 6 or lower were in the low-income group.
Education level: More- (vs. less-) educated populations were defined as those with (vs. without) a college or university degree. Answers to the question about the level of education that the respondent completed were used for grouping. Respondents with a two-year associate degree from a college or university or a higher level were in the more-educated group whereas those without any college degree were in the less-educated group.
Age: According to the age groups of the U.S. Census Bureau, respondents who reported between 18 and 24 years were classed as in the young adult populations, those who reported 25–64 years were classed as being in the adult populations, and those who reported being 65 years or older were categorized as being in the senior populations.
Ethnicity: The responses to the question about individuals' identification of their own ethnicity, including “White non-Hispanic”, “Black non-Hispanic”, “White Hispanic” “Black Hispanic,” and “Unspecified Hispanic” were used to form four ethnic categories, i.e., White, Black, Hispanic, and ‘other’ ethnicities.
Lagged media with one week.
Lagged media with two weeks.
Lagged media with three weeks.