Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 3;96(3):1032–1044. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky023

Table 4.

Effect of protein supplementation (treatment), fraction, sub-species (Bos taurus and Bos indicus), and time (0 h and 4 h postfeeding) on the relative abundance of the most abundant phyla

Phylum1 Relative abundance Fraction P-value Fraction
Liquid Solid
Bacteroidetes5 65.44 <0.0001 70.00 60.80
Firmicutes2,5 28.13 <0.0001 23.40 32.90
Spirochaetes3,5 2.22 <0.0001 1.90 2.50
Fibrobacteres3 1.14 >0.05
Proteobacteria5 0.94 <0.0001 1.40 0.50
Tm7 0.55 0.01 0.51 0.59
Tenericutes 0.48 <0.0001 0.79 0.17
Chloroflexi5 0.2 <0.0001 0.09 0.31
Actinobacteria 0.19 <0.0001 0.11 0.27
Synergistetes 0.18 <0.0001 0.11 0.24
Verrucomicrobia4 0.17 >0.05

1No significant sub-species × treatment or fraction × treatment differences.

2Treatment (P = 0.025) Control = 27.2%, 50 L UIP = 29.1%, 150 L UIP = 27.8%, H UIP = 29.5%, and 150 H UIP = 27.1%, CON= supplemented, 50 H DIP = 50 mg N/kg BW 69.5% wheat middling, 30% soybean meal, and 0.5% urea, 150 H DIP = 150 mg N/kg BW 69.5% wheat middling, 30% soybean meal, and 0.5%, 50 L DIP = 50 mg N/kg BW 100% distillers’ grains, 150 L DIP = 150 mg N/kg BW 100% distillers’ grains.

3Fraction × sub-species (P < 0.05), Spirochaetes: Angus × liquid 1.67%, Brahman × liquid 2.15%, Angus × solid 2.63%, Brahman × solid 2.44% and Fibrobacteres: Angus × liquid 0.89%, Brahman × liquid 1.25%, Angus × solid 1.29%, Brahman × solid 1.16%.

4Sub-species (P = 0.01), Angus 0.19% vs. Brahman 0.13%.

5Time (P < 0.006) Bacteroidetes 0 h 66.7% vs. 4 h 64.1%, Firmicutes 0 h 27.4% vs. 4 h 29.0%, Spirochaetes 0 h 2.0% vs. 4 h 2.4%, Proterobacteria 0 h 0.9% vs. 4 h 1.0%, Chloroflexi 0 h 0.15% vs. 4 h 0.24%.