Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 3;96(3):1032–1044. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky023

Table 6.

Effect of protein supplementation (treatment), fraction, sub-species (Bos taurus and Bos indicus), and time (0 h and 4 h postfeeding) on the relative abundance of the most abundant genera

Sub-species Fraction Time
Family Sub-species P-value Bos taurus Bos indicus Fraction P-value Liquid Solid Time P-value 0 h 4 h
Prevotella 1,2 0.01 28.85 31.00 <0.0001 32.81 28.17 <.0001 30.89 29.09
Prevotellaceae (family)2,3 0.13 11.67 10.96 0.002 10.70 11.85 0.97 11.31 11.32
Ruminococcaceae (family)1 0.004 8.70 8.21 0.21 8.36 8.56 <.0001 8.10 8.82
Sphingobacteriaceae (family) 0.03 7.55 6.48 <0.0001 8.46 5.54 0.02 7.35 6.64
Saccharofermentans 0.36 3.82 3.64 <0.0001 1.39 6.10 0.97 3.74 3.75
Bacteroidales (order) <0.0001 4.30 2.90 <0.0001 5.72 1.43 0.14 3.42 3.74
Pontibacter <0.0001 2.69 4.36 0.59 3.45 3.55 0.5 3.55 3.46
Bacteroides 0.01 2.86 2.54 <0.0001 2.43 2.94 0.69 2.71 2.66
Treponema 0.76 1.73 1.71 <0.0001 1.10 2.38 0.001 1.54 1.91
Erysipelotrichaceae (family) 0.61 1.69 1.76 <0.0001 2.98 0.45 0.47 1.67 1.76
Succiniclasticum 0.01 1.36 1.62 0.001 1.63 1.34 0.06 1.56 1.42
Blautia 0.2 1.41 1.49 <0.0001 0.88 2.03 0.57 1.47 1.44
Clostridium 0.98 1.29 1.30 <0.0001 0.93 1.66 0.22 1.26 1.33
Fibrobacter 4 0.34 1.19 1.09 0.19 1.07 1.23 0.08 1.05 1.24
Ruminococcus 0.29 1.03 0.96 <0.0001 0.53 1.48 0.72 1.00 1.01

1Sub-species × treatment (P < 0.05).

2Fraction × treatment (P < 0.05)

3Treatment (P = 0.0029) CON 11.70% 50 H UIP 11.47% 150 H UIP 12.97% 50 L UIP 10.04% 150 L UIP 10.40%, CON= supplemented, 50 H DIP = 50 mg N/kg BW 69.5% wheat middling, 30% soybean meal, and 0.5% urea, 150 H DIP = 150 mg N/kg BW 69.5% wheat middling, 30% soybean meal, and 0.5%, 50 L DIP = 50 mg N/kg BW 100% distillers’ grains, 150 L DIP = 150 mg N/kg BW 100% distillers’ grains.

4Fraction × sub-species (P < 0.05).