Table 4.

The most abundant shared species (OTUs) between pigs fed control or SDPP diets¹

OTU #	Species (OTUs)	E value	Day 0		Day 7		Day 14		Day 21		Day 28		SEM	P-value
			CTL	SDPP	CTL	SDPP	CTL	SDPP	CTL	SDPP	CTL	SDPP		trt5	day	trt × day
2	L. Delbrueckii	E-82	0.17	4.05	9.55	9.80	20.33	20.60	10.27	13.97	2.99	9.74	4.7	0.345	0.003	0.956
3	Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum/ beijerinckii	E-66	1.53	3.05	0.46	3.01	4.96	15.07***	3.82	1.36	9.82	4.83*	2.0	0.304	<0.001	0.003
5	Ruminococcus torques	5E-67	9.06	7.88	5.71	3.30	3.05	2.72	2.02	1.71	2.73	1.63	1.2	0.196	<0.001	0.948
8	Bacteroidetes.S247	2E-45	4.22	2.85	2.52	5.29	1.80	6.27	1.87	0.56	0.30	2.71	1.7	0.207	0.259	0.293
9	Coprococcus catus	E-58	5.22	4.95	2.49	1.38	2.24	1.62	1.33	1.13	0.95	0.81	0.7	0.337	<0.001	0.978
10	Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae	E-42	16.08	3.93***	0.78	0.22	0.05	0.03	0.00	0.00	0.03	0.02	2.6	0.110	<0.001	0.051
12	Bacteroides fragilis	2E-76	15.45	3.99	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	2.6	0.161	<0.001	0.087
17	Escherichia coli/Shigella	E-77	6.66	5.66	0.03	0.00	0.02	0.05	0.00	0.23	0.00	0.00	1.3	0.853	<0.001	0.990
19	Prevotella dentalis	6E-66	1.12	5.32	0.08	0.02	0.03	0.01	0.07	0.02	0.02	0.02	1.0	0.194	0.003	0.111
20	Unclassified Bacteroidales	5E-27	1.83	4.13	0.10	1.32	0.47	0.14	0.66	0.01	0.02	0.06	0.7	0.238	<0.001	0.167
24	Porphyromonas spp.	4E-63	1.36	1.20	0.56	1.49	0.47	2.48	0.39	0.24	0.08	0.94	0.6	0.079	0.211	0.310
34	Ruminococcus bromii	6E-56	2.90	2.21	0.54	0.55	0.05	0.06	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.01	0.5	0.722	<0.001	0.964
44	Clostridium perfringens	3E-64	1.72	1.38	0.00	0.01	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.4	0.788	<0.001	0.988
4	Coprococcus catus 2	2E-70	0.34	0.14	19.46	8.49	9.11	4.45	2.71	3.18	3.51	2.74	1.8	0.015	<0.001	0.081
6	Ruminococcus champanellensis	E-28	0.32	0.01	7.19	5.43	6.11	2.41	2.28	2.92	3.36	2.39	1.1	0.125	0.001	0.414
11	Roseburia hominis	E-68	0.18	0.37	4.57	4.26	3.05	1.56	2.23	1.52	1.54	0.87	0.7	0.169	<0.001	0.77
16	Clostridium acidurici	4E-38	0.01	0.02	1.90	2.76	2.26	0.59	1.80	1.47	0.58	0.40	0.01	0.390	<0.001	0.165
22	Bifidobacterium t hermacidophilum/boum/ thermophilum	2E-45	0.01	0.00	3.04	2.21	3.30	1.27	0.09	0.88	0.08	0.18	0.9	0.554	0.038	0.657
23	Lactobacillus spp.	4E-63	0.04	0.61	1.95	0.12	1.85	0.12	0.12	1.34	0.01	0.05	0.8	0.518	0.683	0.267
21	Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae	2E-73	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.01	0.01	4.66	1.53	1.92	0.04	1.4	0.259	0.099	0.676
25	Megasphaera elsdenii	6E-81	0.80	0.03	0.27	0.76	0.41	0.08	0.49	1.70**	0.03	0.11	0.3	0.514	0.015	0.024
26	Streptococcus parauberis	3E-69	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.01	0.00	2.72	2.13	0.14	0.16	1.1	0.869	0.088	0.998
13	Clostridium difficile	4E-33	1.05	2.09	0.01	0.39	0.26	1.83*	1.00	0.47	3.06	1.68*	1.0	0.482	<0.001	0.010
33	Streptococcus spp. 3	E-65	0.53	1.57	1.06	5.13	0.20	5.38	37.64	44.71	51.07	57.01	9.69	0.270	<0.001	0.990
14	L. reuteri 4	6E-76	1.15	5.91	5.04	8.08	11.98	6.69*	3.89	1.81	0.62	0.11	2.9	0.99	<0.001	0.098

¹Dietary treatments included control (CTL) and SDPP. Data were presented as percent of OTUs in total sequences of a treatment.

²Treatment effect (P = 0.015; CTL = 7.03%; SDPP = 3.80%) when averaged across all timepoints.

³Combined OTU1 + 18 + 33 for Streptococcus spp. (98% similarity).

⁴Combined OTU7 and OUT14 for Lactobacillus reuteri (98% similarity).

⁵Treatment.