Table 6.
Correlation of ADG1 and bacterial taxa2 at the OTU level on d 7, 14, 21, and 28 using Pearson analysis3
| Day | OTU_ID | Putative species | Family | Seq ID | Identity, % | Pearson’s R index | P 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 38 | Prevotella copri | Prevotellaceae | NR_113411.1 | 98% | −0.72 | 0.019 |
| 7 | 84 | Neglecta timonensis | Ruminococcaceae | NR_144736.1 | 97% | 0.70 | 0.023 |
| 7 | 14 | Lactobacillus coleohominis | Lactobacillaceae | NR_042436.1 | 98% | 0.66 | 0.037 |
| 14 | 57 | Oscillibacter valericigenes | Oscillospiraceae | NR_074793.1 | 92% | −0.68 | 0.005 |
| 14 | 1 | Streptococcus equinus | Streptococcaceae | NR_113594.1 | 98% | 0.55 | 0.036 |
| 21 | 60 | Catenibacterium mitsuokai | Erysipelotrichaceae | NR_027526.1 | 96% | 0.58 | 0.024 |
1Growth performance data from this experiment previously reported (Tran et al., 2014).
2Only taxa with P < 0.05 are shown.
3Correlation determined using Person’s R index within Calypso (Zakrzewski et al., 2016). Raw sequences were normalized to total number of sequences of each sample before the correlation was determined.