Table 7.

Correlation of BW¹ and bacterial taxa² at the OTU level on d 7, 14, 21, and 28 using Pearson analysis³

Day	OTU_ID	Putative species	Family	Seq. ID	Identity, %	Pearson’s R index	P
7	91	Adlercreutzia equolifaciens	Eggerthellaceae	NR_121696.1	91%	0.79	0.007
7	38	Prevotella copri	Prevotellaceae	NR_113411.1	98%	−0.66	0.037
14	57	Oscillibacter valericigenes	Oscillospiraceae	NR_074793.1	92%	−0.65	0.008
14	117	Ruminococcus bromii	Ruminococcaceae	NR_025930.1	97%	−0.6	0.017
14	42	Butyricicoccus pullicaecorum	Clostridiaceae	NR_044490.1	92%	−0.56	0.029
14	99	Romboutsia timonensis	Peptostreptococcaceae	NR_144740.1	98%	0.54	0.037
14	72	Blautia marasmi	Lachnospiraceae	NR_147395.1	97%	−0.52	0.046
14	122	Mitsuokella jalaludinii	Selenomonadaceae	NR_028840.1	99%	−0.52	0.048
21	14	Lactobacillus pontis	Lactobacillaceae	NR_036788.2	98%	−0.65	0.008
21	100	Acetoanaerobium pronyense	Peptostreptococcaceae	NR_136796.1	94%	−0.64	0.011
21	20	Imtechella halotolerans	Flavobacteriaceae	NR_117181.2	83%	−0.62	0.013
21	53	Peptostreptococcus russellii	Peptostreptococcaceae	NR_115155.1	92%	−0.61	0.015
21	35	Lactobacillus gasseri	Lactobacillaceae	NR_075051.1	98%	−0.58	0.023
21	8	Barnesiella viscericola	Barnesiellaceae	NR_121773.1	88%	−0.56	0.030
21	42	Butyricicoccus pullicaecorum	Clostridiaceae	NR_044490.1	92%	−0.52	0.048
28	35	Lactobacillus gasseri	Lactobacillaceae	NR_075051.1	98%	−0.66	0.005
28	15	Pseudoflavonifractor phocaeensis	Clostridiales4	NR_147370.1	95%	0.55	0.026
28	40	Intestinimonas butyriciproducens	Clostridiales4	NR_118554.1	94%	0.55	0.028
28	153	Eubacterium tarantellae	Clostridiaceae	NR_104741.1	94%	−0.51	0.044

¹Growth performance data from this experiment previously reported (Tran et al., 2014).

²Only taxa with P < 0.05 are shown.

³Correlation determined using Person’s R index within Calypso (Zakrzewski et al., 2016). Raw sequences were normalized to total number of sequences of each sample before the correlation was determined.

⁴Unclassified clostridiales.