Table 1.
Study design (WG-1) | 1. Survival follow-up should reasonably reflect the clinical time course of the sepsis model | R |
2. Therapeutic interventions should be initiated after the septic insult replicating clinical care | ||
3. We recommend that the treatment be randomized and blinded when feasible | ||
4. Provide as much information as possible (e.g., ARRIVE guidelines) on the model and methodology, to enable replication | ||
a. Consider replication of the findings in models that include co-morbidity and/or other biological variables (i.e., age, gender, diabetes, cancer, immuno-suppression, genetic background, and others) | C | |
b. In addition to rodents (mice and rats), consider modeling sepsis also in other (mammal) species | ||
c. Consider need for source control | ||
Humane modeling (WG-2) | 5. The development and validation of standardized criteria to monitor the well-being of septic animals is recommended | R |
6. The development and validation of standardized criteria for euthanasia of septic animals is recommended (exceptions possible) | ||
7. Analgesics recommended for surgical sepsis consistent with ethical considerations | ||
d. Consider analgesics for nonsurgical sepsis | C |
R recommendation strength, C consideration strength