Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 15;8:12190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30740-y

Table 3.

Cox-proportional hazard regression for the cerebrovascular disease (CVD) and myocardial infarction (MI) by the proportion of days covered (PDC) with the stratification by sex.

Proportion of days covered (PDC) P for trend
≥0.80 0.60–0.79 0.40–0.59 0.20–0.39 <0.20
Hazard ratio 95% CI Hazard ratio 95% CI Hazard ratio 95% CI Hazard ratio 95% CI
Total No. of participants N = 22,261 N = 11,459 N = 10,279 N = 10,393 N = 10,675
Cerebrovascular disease
Total person-years 204,354.8 104,059.3 92,813.8 92,862.4 94,075.1
All [No. of event] N = 1,584 N = 906 N = 829 N = 948 N = 1,019
Model 1 Reference 1.21 1.11–1.31 1.21 1.12–1.32 1.38 1.27–1.50 1.44 1.33–1.56 <0.001
Model 2 1.19 1.10–1.29 1.18 1.09–1.29 1.35 1.24–1.46 1.41 1.30–1.52 <0.001
Men [No. of event] N = 931 N = 558 N = 501 N = 577 N = 594
Model 1 Reference 1.26 1.14–1.40 1.23 1.10–1.37 1.43 1.29–1.59 1.43 1.29–1.59 <0.001
Model 2 1.24 1.12–1.38 1.19 1.07–1.33 1.39 1.25–1.54 1.39 1.26–1.55 <0.001
Women [No. of event] N = 653 N = 348 N = 328 N = 371 N = 425
Model 1 Reference 1.12 0.99–1.28 1.18 1.04–1.35 1.31 1.15–1.48 1.44 1.27–1.63 <0.001
Model 2 1.12 0.98–1.27 1.16 1.01–1.32 1.27 1.12–1.45 1.41 1.25–1.59 <0.001
Myocardial infarction
Total person-years 209,197.3 106,730.9 95,272.1 95,506.6 97,376.5
All [No. of event] N = 426 N = 229 N = 199 N = 237 N = 203
Model 1 Reference 1.10 0.94–1.29 1.05 0.89–1.24 1.25 1.06–1.46 1.04 0.88–1.23 0.094
Model 2 1.09 0.93–1.28 1.03 0.87–1.22 1.23 1.05–1.44 1.02 0.86–1.21 0.138
Men [No. of event] N = 326 N = 168 N = 150 N = 172 N = 150
Model 1 Reference 1.03 0.86–1.24 1.01 0.83–1.22 1.16 0.96–1.39 0.98 0.81–1.20 0.566
Model 2 1.02 0.85–1.23 0.99 0.81–1.20 1.14 0.95–1.37 0.97 0.80–1.18 0.595
Women [No. of event] N = 100 N = 61 N = 49 N = 65 N = 53
Model 1 Reference 1.29 0.94–1.77 1.15 0.81–1.61 1.48 1.08–2.02 1.14 0.81–1.59 0.159
Model 2 1.28 0.93–1.76 1.11 0.79–1.57 1.42 1.03–1.94 1.10 0.79–1.54 0.236

Model 1: adjusted for age and sex (only age in stratified analysis). Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, disability, CCI, monthly contribution, insurance type, medical institution type, hypertension, and active ingredients of oral hypoglycemic agents (except sex in stratified analysis).