Skip to main content
. 2018 May 12;96(6):2154–2161. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky074

Table 3.

Comparison of the results of the ROC analyses from (a) SHP and (b) GP at all time points [T1 (30 min) – T5 (150 min)] and AUC, AUC0–90 and AUC90–150

(a) SHP
Time Point Cut-off Se 95% CI Sp 95% CI ROC-AUC 95% CI ROC
AUC’s SE
P-value
T1 (30 min) 2.92 83% 36–100% 75% 51–91% 78% 51–91% 0.09656 0.0017
T2 (60 min) 4.92 100% 54–100% 75% 51–91% 91% 69–98% 0.06001 0.0000
T3 (90 min) 7.14 83% 36–100% 80% 56–94% 87% 62–96% 0.07553 0.0000
T4 (120 min) 7.26 83% 36–100% 60% 36–81% 80% 51–93% 0.09732 0.0010
T5 (150 min) 7.05 83% 36–100% 70% 46–88% 78% 51–91% 0.09558 0.0020
AUC 24.4 100% 54–100% 70% 46–88% 86% 62–95% 0.07523 0.0000
AUC 0–90 9.53 100% 54–100% 65% 41–85% 89% 64–97% 0.06945 0.0000
AUC 90–150 –6.47 50% 12–88% 40% 19–64% 30% 7–49% 0.11010 0.0402
(b) GP
Time Point Cut-off Se 95% CI Sp 95% CI ROC-AUC 95% CI ROC
AUC’s SE
P-value
T1 (30 min) 1.40 75% 48–93% 51% 36–66% 64% 44–78% 0.08299 0.0455
T2 (60 min) 4.04 75% 48–93% 52% 37–67% 68% 51–79% 0.07043 0.0064
T3 (90 min) 7.23 56% 30–80% 59% 43–73% 62% 46–75% 0.07291 0.0468
T4 (120 min) 8.40 63% 35–85% 65% 50–79% 65% 48–78% 0.07582 0.0233
T5 (150 min) 7.25 56% 30–80% 54% 39–69% 61% 43–75% 0.08103 0.0820
AUC 25.12 63% 35–85% 61% 45–75% 66% 49–79% 0.07539 0.0231
AUC 0–90 9.30 69% 41–89% 57% 41–71% 68% 51–80% 0.07284 0.0073
AUC 90–150 −5.12 50% 25–75% 61% 45–75% 47% 30–61% 0.08000 0.0086

For each variable, the cut-off value (Cut-off) with best sensitivity (Se) (including its 95% CI), specificity (Sp) (including its 95% CI), area under the ROC-curve (ROC-AUC) [including its 95% CI and its SE (ROC-AUC’s SE)] and 1-Sided P-value (P-value) is given.

AUC = area under the curve; CI = confidence interval; GP = the general population; ROC = receiver-operating characteristic; SHP = sport horse population.