Table 9.
Regression equations to estimate DE and ME in defatted rice brans (Exp. 1)
Statistics1 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number | Regression equation | R 2 | C(p) | RMSE | AIC | BIC |
1 | DE = 311.10 + (60.11 × % starch) | 0.80 | 5.61 | 183.24 | 95.53 | 96.88 |
2 | DE = 416.57 + (53.10 × % starch) + (125.18 × % EE) | 0.93 | 0.75 | 117.68 | 88.17 | 94.65 |
3 | DE = 4,041 – (48.85 × % NDF) | 0.83 | 6.12 | 166.23 | 93.78 | 94.94 |
4 | DE = 3,750 – (42.96 × % NDF) + (92.32 × % EE) | 0.90 | 3.78 | 140.18 | 91.32 | 95.08 |
5 | DE = 10,811 – (50.69 × % NDF) + (148.04 × % EE) – (1.64 × GE) | 0.94 | 2.98 | 117.7 | 88.54 | 97.44 |
6 | ME = 258.27 + (57.16 × % starch) | 0.82 | 15.53 | 161.71 | 93.28 | 92.41 |
7 | ME = 342.31 + (51.57 × % starch) + (99.75× % EE) | 0.92 | 6.71 | 120.13 | 88.55 | 90.10 |
8 | ME = 3,787 – (45.80 × % NDF) | 0.83 | 6.22 | 155.54 | 92.58 | 93.71 |
9 | ME = 2,669 – (56.95 × % NDF) + (125.73× % ash) | 0.91 | 3.17 | 124.56 | 89.20 | 93.53 |
10 | ATTD of GE = 0.89 – (0.0033 × % NDF) | 0.84 | 17.84 | 0.011 | –79.76 | –80.92 |
11 | ATTD of GE = 0.87 – (0.0029 × % NDF) + (0.0057 × % EE) | 0.90 | 11.65 | 0.0094 | –80.76 | –82.37 |
12 | ATTD of GE = 1.43 – (0.0035 × % NDF) + (0.010 × % EE) – (0.00013 × GE) | 0.96 | 5.32 | 0.0067 | –87.33 | –82.30 |
13 | ATTD of GE = 0.64 + (0. 0041 × % starch) | 0.82 | 10.16 | 0.012 | –78.58 | –79.47 |
14 | ATTD of GE = 0.64 + (0. 0037 × % starch) + (0. 0080 × % EE) | 0.94 | 2.16 | 0.0073 | –86.28 | –82.74 |
15 | ATTD of GE = 1.18 + (0. 0041 × % starch)+ (0. 014 × % EE) – (0. 032 × GE) | 0.97 | 2.56 | 0.0057 | –90.40 | –80.84 |
Regression equations are developed by stepwise regression analyses, P < 0.01 of all equations.
1RMSE = root-mean-square error; AIC = Akaike information criterion; BIC = Bayesian information criterion; C(p) = the Mallows statistic.