Table 3.
Dietary treatment | P value5 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item | CON1 | 0.08% GAA2 | 0.12% GAA3 | SEM 4 | Linear | Quadratic |
Pre-starter | ||||||
BW at 60 d, kg | 17.78b | 18.10ab | 18.28a | 0.10 | 0.002 | 0.650 |
ADG, g | 354b | 364ab | 370a | 3.29 | 0.002 | 0.617 |
ADFI, g | 590 | 597 | 599 | 3.62 | 0.091 | 0.497 |
G:F | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.01 | 0.042 | 0.980 |
Starter | ||||||
BW at 90 d, kg | 31.61b | 32.43b | 33.66a | 0.28 | <0.001 | 0.501 |
ADG, g | 461b | 478b | 513a | 7.75 | <0.001 | 0.338 |
ADFI, g | 941 | 950 | 952 | 11.69 | 0.532 | 0.771 |
G:F | 0.489b | 0.503b | 0.538a | 0.004 | <0.001 | 0.046 |
Grower | ||||||
BW at 120 d, kg | 52.31c | 53.41b | 55.40a | 0.29 | <0.001 | 0.245 |
ADG, g | 690b | 699ab | 725a | 7.77 | 0.004 | 0.404 |
ADFI, g | 2012 | 2023 | 2002 | 21.84 | 0.761 | 0.546 |
G:F | 0.344b | 0.344b | 0.361a | 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.005 |
Finisher | ||||||
BW at 180 d, kg | 95.3c | 97.19b | 101.0a | 0.35 | <0.001 | 0.047 |
ADG, g | 717c | 730b | 759a | 3.70 | <0.001 | 0.093 |
ADFI, g | 2376 | 2390 | 2378 | 7.18 | 0.866 | 0.161 |
G:F | 0.300b | 0.305b | 0.319a | 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.085 |
Overall (30 to 180 d) | ||||||
ADG, g | 588c | 600b | 625a | 2.31 | <0.001 | 0.037 |
ADFI, g | 1659 | 1670 | 1662 | 5.29 | 0.731 | 0.147 |
G:F | 0.353c | 0.361b | 0.374a | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.160 |
a,b,cWithin a row, means without a common superscript differ (P < 0.05).
1CON- control (basal) diet.
20.08% GAA= basal diet + 0.8 kg GAA/MT.
30.12% GAA= basal diet + 1.2 kg GAA /MT.
4SEM = standard error of mean.
5Considered significant when P < 0.05. Orthogonal polynomial contrasts were used to determine linear and quadratic effects of increasing levels of GAA (0%, 0.08%, and 0.12%) in the pig diets.