Table 2.
Effects of increasing dietary D-xylose on growth performance of growing pigs
| D-xylose | SEM | P values1 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 5% | 15% | 25% | Trt | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| BW, kg | ||||||||
| Initial | 21.4 | 21.4 | 21.3 | 21.3 | 0.05 | 0.539 | 0.216 | 0.4778 |
| Final | 43.4a | 43.7a | 42.5a | 39.1b | 0.84 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.044 |
| ADFI, kg/d | ||||||||
| Week 1 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.05 | 0.575 | 0.566 | 0.196 |
| Week 2 | 1.06 | 1.10 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.11 | 0.635 | 0.270 | 0.791 |
| Week 3 | 1.71 | 1.84 | 1.62 | 1.81 | 0.12 | 0.574 | 0.877 | 0.778 |
| Week 4 | 1.82 | 1.92 | 1.90 | 1.74 | 0.14 | 0.717 | 0.670 | 0.361 |
| Overall | 1.35 | 1.43 | 1.33 | 1.32 | 0.08 | 0.711 | 0.549 | 0.555 |
| ADG, kg/d | ||||||||
| Week 1 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.31 | 0.05 | 0.129 | 0.023 | 0.612 |
| Week 2 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.06 | 0.203 | 0.109 | 0.167 |
| Week 3 | 0.87 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.77 | 0.06 | 0.059 | 0.324 | 0.022 |
| Week 4 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.08 | 0.139 | 0.024 | 0.815 |
| Overall | 0.79a | 0.80a | 0.76a | 0.63b | 0.03 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.040 |
| G:F | ||||||||
| Week 1 | 0.58a | 0.50ab | 0.46b | 0.40b | 0.04 | 0.035 | 0.004 | 0.830 |
| Week 2 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.97 | 0.82 | 0.10 | 0.781 | 0.735 | 0.466 |
| Week 3 | 0.51ab | 0.54a | 0.61a | 0.44b | 0.04 | 0.025 | 0.432 | 0.011 |
| Week 4 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.04 | 0.125 | 0.026 | 0.421 |
| Overall | 0.59a | 0.56a | 0.57a | 0.49b | 0.07 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.076 |
a,bWithin a row, means with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05). Values are least square means with SEM; n = 8.
1 P values: Trt = overall dietary treatment effect; linear = linear effect to dietary D-xylose; quadratic = quadratic effect to dietary D-xylose.