Table 6.
Effect of added Cu and diet type on gut morphology and relative mRNA gene expression of intestinal fatty acid binding protein (iFABP), copper transporter protein-1 (CTR1), and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1R) in the proximal and distal small intestinal (SI) of finishing pigs1
| Added Cu,2 mg/kg: | 0 | 150 | SEM | Probability, P < | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diet type: | Corn-soy | By-product3 | Corn-soy | By-product3 | Cu × diet type | Cu | Diet type | |
| Gut morphology, μm | ||||||||
| Proximal SI | ||||||||
| Villus height | 290 | 277 | 277 | 274 | 9.3 | 0.625 | 0.376 | 0.369 |
| Crypt depth | 244 | 244 | 214 | 221 | 16.7 | 0.843 | 0.102 | 0.874 |
| Villus:crypt ratio | 1.25 | 1.17 | 1.38 | 1.27 | 0.105 | 0.892 | 0.253 | 0.367 |
| Distal SI | ||||||||
| Villus height | 412 | 404 | 375 | 400 | 17.9 | 0.340 | 0.230 | 0.615 |
| Crypt depth | 227 | 223 | 202 | 212 | 7.6 | 0.330 | 0.017 | 0.683 |
| Villus:crypt ratio | 1.83 | 1.83 | 1.88 | 1.92 | 0.106 | 0.834 | 0.514 | 0.823 |
| Relative mRNA gene expression4 | ||||||||
| Proximal SI | ||||||||
| iFABP | 0.289 | 0.360 | 0.316 | 0.325 | 0.072 | 0.442 | 0.870 | 0.741 |
| CTR1 | 0.591 | 0.601 | 0.661 | 0.528 | 0.130 | 0.363 | 0.882 | 0.457 |
| GLP-1R | 0.800 | 0.802 | 1.364 | 0.957 | 0.420 | 0.623 | 0.391 | 0.685 |
| Distal SI | ||||||||
| iFABP | 1.143 | 0.726 | 0.664 | 0.571 | 0.178 | 0.283 | 0.032 | 0.258 |
| CTR1 | 1.189 | 0.995 | 1.028 | 1.151 | 0.198 | 0.713 | 0.813 | 0.634 |
| GLP-1R | 2.336 | 1.592 | 2.088 | 1.718 | 0.566 | 0.575 | 0.664 | 0.382 |
1A total of 84 pigs (PIC 337 × 1050; initially 27.6 kg BW) were used in a 117-d experiment with 2 pigs per pen and 7 replications per treatment.
2Tri-basic copper chloride (Intellibond C; Micronutrients, Inc., Indianapolis, IN).
3Refers to a diet containing 30% distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) and 15% bakery meal.
4All values indicate relative expression of genes. Normalized expression (ΔCt) for each sample was determined using ribosomal protein L4 as an endogenous control gene. The average normalized expression of the pooled control sample was used as the calibrator to calculate relative gene expression. For each sample, relative expression was calculated as 2−ΔΔCt, in which ΔΔCt represents ΔCt sample − ΔCt calibrator (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001).