Skip to main content
. 2018 May 19;96(8):3370–3380. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky194

Table 3.

Influence of feeding system, dietary adaptation period, and direct-fed microbial supplementation on growth performance

Item Feeding system
Conventionally fed Naturally fed
14 d 28 d 14 d 28 d P-values2
−DFM1 +DFM −DFM +DFM −DFM +DFM −DFM +DFM SEM3 Syst Adapt DFM Syst × adapt Syst × DFM Adapt × DFM Syst × Adapt × DFM
Initial BW, kg 390 395 397 397 387 379 390 388 7.9 0.12 0.32 0.79 0.88 0.50 0.95 0.67
Final BW, kg 619 624 607 632 600 591 593 593 11.4 0.001 0.77 0.51 0.98 0.21 0.39 0.68
ADG, kg/d 1.64 1.63 1.53 1.70 1.48 1.42 1.50 1.39 0.048 <0.001 0.67 0.87 0.85 0.02 0.29 0.08
DMI, kg/d 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.6 11.0 11.3 11.2 11.4 0.28 0.48 0.31 0.41 0.87 0.78 0.98 0.86
DMI, % of BW/d 2.22 2.22 2.23 2.22 2.22 2.23 2.23 2.23 0.043 0.10 0.23 0.38 0.87 0.13 0.42 0.89
DMI variance, kg2 6.75 7.45 6.87 6.30 6.28 7.18 7.59 7.49 0.481 0.39 0.67 0.50 0.05 0.62 0.10 0.83
G:F 0.147 0.144 0.134 0.147 0.136 0.126 0.134 0.122 0.0039 <0.001 0.16 0.33 0.65 0.006 0.20 0.09

1Direct-fed microbial; − = without, + = with.

2Syst = conventionally fed vs. naturally fed; Adapt = 14 vs. 28 d; DFM = −DFM vs. +DFM.

3Standard error of the mean for the Syst × Adapt × DFM interaction.