Table 5.
Influence of dietary Zn and ractopamine inclusion on daily micro mineral fecal and urine excretion, and mineral retention of steers as a percent of intake during 5-d collection period
ZNTRT1 | BA1 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item | CON2 | SUPZN2 | P value4 | NON3 | RAC3 | P value4 | SEM |
Steers (n) | 16 | 15 | 15 | 16 | |||
Fecal excretion | |||||||
Cu, % | 78.2 | 78.9 | 0.89 | 76.7 | 80.5 | 0.49 | 3.67 |
Fe, % | 62.0 | 60.8 | 0.61 | 60.6 | 62.2 | 0.53 | 1.71 |
Mn, % | 76.7 | 69.4 | 0.06 | 71.9 | 74.2 | 0.50 | 2.32 |
Zn, % | 64.9 | 65.7 | 0.83 | 63.1 | 67.4 | 0.25 | 2.45 |
Urinary excretion | |||||||
Cu, % | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.81 | 0.017 |
Fe, % | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.89 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.81 | 0.018 |
Mn, % | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.37 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.50 | 0.027 |
Zn, % | 0.35 | 0.13 | <0.01 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 0.41 | 0.035 |
Apparent absorption | |||||||
Cu, % | 21.8 | 21.1 | 0.89 | 23.3 | 19.5 | 0.49 | 3.67 |
Fe, % | 38.0 | 39.3 | 0.51 | 39.4 | 37.8 | 0.53 | 1.71 |
Mn, % | 23.3 | 30.6 | 0.06 | 28.1 | 25.8 | 0.50 | 2.32 |
Zn, % | 35.1 | 34.3 | 0.83 | 36.9 | 32.6 | 0.25 | 2.45 |
Mineral retention | |||||||
Cu, % | 21.6 | 21.0 | 0.90 | 23.2 | 19.4 | 0.49 | 3.68 |
Fe, % | 37.9 | 39.1 | 0.61 | 39.3 | 37.7 | 0.53 | 1.72 |
Mn, % | 23.2 | 30.5 | 0.05 | 28.0 | 25.7 | 0.50 | 2.32 |
Zn, % | 34.8 | 34.2 | 0.88 | 36.6 | 32.3 | 0.25 | 2.46 |
1ZNTRT (mineral supplementation strategy); BA (β-adrenergic agonist supplementation strategy).
2CON (no supplemental Zn; analyzed 32 mg Zn/kg DM); SUPZN [CON + 60 ppm ZnSO4 + 60 ppm zinc-amino acid complex (Availa-Zn; Zinpro, Eden Prairie, MN), analyzed 145 mg Zn/kg DM].
3NON (no supplemental ractopamine HCl); RAC (300 mg steer−1 d−1 ractopamine HCl; Actogain 45, Zoetis, Parsippany, NJ).
4ZNTRT × BA interaction was not significant (P ≥ 0.19).