Table 3.
Effect of animal species and feedlot period on growth performance and carcass tissue composition
Item | Species | Days in feedlot | SEM | P value1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Goat | Sheep | 28 | 56 | 84 | Species | DF | S × DF | ||
Performance2 (kg) | |||||||||
Final BW | 27.44 | 31.43 | 23.75 | 29.75 | 34.81 | 1.40 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.20 |
Weight total gain | 7.74 | 11.73 | 4.05 | 10.05 | 15.11 | 1.23 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.20 |
ADG | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.34 |
HCW | 12.87 | 14.55 | 11.05 | 13.25 | 16.83 | 0.71 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.62 |
CCW3 | 12.78 | 14.47 | 10.98 | 13.26 | 16.64 | 0.70 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.58 |
Weight of tissue (kg)4 | |||||||||
Muscle | 7.74 | 8.08 | 7.08 | 7.81 | 8.83 | 0.37 | 0.60 | 0.10 | 0.28 |
Fat | 1.15 | 2.51 | 1.23 | 1.69 | 2.57 | 0.21 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Bone | 2.62 | 2.68 | 2.20 | 2.64 | 3.11 | 0.11 | 0.64 | <0.01 | 0.44 |
Tissue ratio | |||||||||
Muscle:bone | 2.82 | 3.04 | 2.94 | 2.95 | 2.90 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.94 | 0.43 |
Fat:bone | 0.43 | 0.91 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.83 | 0.03 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Fat:muscle | 0.16 | 0.30 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.28 | 0.007 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Weight of tissue (% CCW)5 | |||||||||
Muscle | 66.14 | 61.43 | 65.49 | 64.49 | 61.38 | 0.73 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.92 |
Fat | 10.27 | 18.19 | 12.09 | 13.64 | 16.95 | 0.98 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Bone | 23.58 | 20.36 | 22.40 | 21.85 | 21.66 | 0.52 | <0.01 | 0.76 | 0.27 |
1DF = days in feedlot; S × DF = interaction between animal species and days in feedlot.
2Final BW: linear effect: P < 0.01 and quadratic effect: P = 0.64; weight total gain: linear effect: P < 0.01 and quadratic effect: P = 0.64; ADG: linear effect: P < 0.01 and quadratic effect: P = 0.27; HCW: linear effect: P < 0.01 and quadratic effect: P = 0.29; CCW: linear effect: P < 0.01 and quadratic effect: P = 0.37.
3CCW = cold carcass weight.
4Bone: linear effect: P < 0.01 and quadratic effect: P = 0.85.
5Muscle: linear effect: P < 0.01 and quadratic effect: P = 0.70.