Table 8.
Effect of standardized ileal digestible (SID) lysine and added Cu on carcass characteristics of finishing pigs, Exp. 11
| Probability, P < | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Added Cu,2 mg/kg: | 0 | 150 | Cu × Lys | SID Lys | ||||||||
| SID Lys,3 %: | 85.0 | 92.5 | 100.0 | 85.0 | 92.5 | 100.0 | SEM | Linear | Quadratic | Cu | Linear | Quadratic |
| Carcass characteristics4 | ||||||||||||
| HCW, kg | 92.6 | 94.7 | 94.3 | 93.3 | 94.6 | 96.7 | 1.15 | 0.346 | 0.290 | 0.170 | 0.007 | 0.619 |
| Carcass yield,5 % | 75.45 | 75.51 | 74.76 | 75.47 | 75.16 | 74.97 | 0.464 | 0.838 | 0.557 | 0.921 | 0.203 | 0.666 |
| Backfat,6 mm. | 16.3 | 16.8 | 15.7 | 16.0 | 16.3 | 16.0 | 0.43 | 0.745 | 0.509 | 0.765 | 0.553 | 0.215 |
| Loin depth,6 mm. | 69.6 | 68.8 | 68.8 | 68.8 | 69.6 | 70.6 | 0.66 | 0.0687 | 0.930 | 0.260 | 0.340 | 0.601 |
| Lean,6 % | 57.42 | 57.31 | 58.12 | 57.59 | 58.04 | 57.87 | 0.222 | 0.342 | 0.0578 | 0.249 | 0.040 | 0.696 |
| Carcass performance | ||||||||||||
| HCW ADG,9 kg | 0.591 | 0.608 | 0.605 | 0.597 | 0.607 | 0.625 | 0.007 | 0.321 | 0.276 | 0.151 | 0.006 | 0.591 |
| HCW G:F10 | 0.271 | 0.276 | 0.276 | 0.273 | 0.278 | 0.281 | 0.004 | 0.581 | 0.642 | 0.137 | 0.012 | 0.412 |
| Liver color11 | ||||||||||||
| Lightness, L*12 | 32.55 | 31.18 | 32.24 | 31.48 | 31.05 | 32.08 | 0.594 | 0.431 | 0.888 | 0.160 | 0.800 | 0.191 |
| Redness, a*13 | 14.86 | 15.01 | 14.71 | 14.77 | 14.09 | 13.71 | 0.359 | 0.206 | 0.537 | 0.027 | 0.097 | 0.912 |
| Yellowness, b*14 | 6.42 | 5.59 | 6.19 | 6.75 | 5.61 | 5.68 | 0.461 | 0.357 | 0.271 | 0.303 | 0.163 | 0.695 |
| Hue Angle, °15 | 0.399 | 0.409 | 0.389 | 0.424 | 0.370 | 0.379 | 0.199 | 0.376 | 0.186 | 0.647 | 0.170 | 0.639 |
| Chroma16 | 16.24 | 16.43 | 16.02 | 16.28 | 15.23 | 14.98 | 0.488 | 0.266 | 0.404 | 0.071 | 0.125 | 0.908 |
| Liver mineral concentration,11 mg/kg | ||||||||||||
| Cu | 13 | 13 | 12 | 33 | 39 | 26 | 3.27 | 0.393 | 0.105 | 0.001 | 0.182 | 0.092 |
| Fe | 196 | 221 | 211 | 200 | 203 | 205 | 11.43 | 0.654 | 0.368 | 0.437 | 0.344 | 0.322 |
| Zn | 62 | 59 | 59 | 59 | 57 | 55 | 2.29 | 0.566 | 0.806 | 0.095 | 0.099 | 0.841 |
| Iodine value,11,17 g/100g | ||||||||||||
| Backfat | 82.63 | 81.75 | 82.21 | 82.64 | 82.44 | 83.36 | 0.901 | 0.530 | 0.942 | 0.406 | 0.869 | 0.433 |
| Jowl fat | 84.20 | 84.62 | 83.61 | 82.73 | 83.61 | 85.48 | 0.861 | 0.052 | 0.402 | 0.769 | 0.202 | 0.882 |
1A total of 1,248 pigs [PIC 337 × 1050, PIC (Hendersonville, TN); initial BW = 29.0 ± 0.1 kg] were used in a 120 d study; 8 pens per treatment and 26 pigs per pen.
2Tribasic copper chloride (Intellibond C; Micronutrients, Inc.).
3SID Lys values are expressed as the percentage of estimated SID Lys requirement for these pigs in this environment and production stage.
41,069 pigs (19 to 23 pigs/pen) were transported to a commercial packing plant for processing and data collection (Swift and Company, Worthington, MN) and 144 pigs (three pigs/pen) visually assumed to represent the mean live weight of the pen were subsampled and shipped to a separate processing facility for further carcass measurements (Natural Foods Holdings, Inc., Sioux Center, IA). The weighted average of the two plants were used for HCW, farm yield, and backfat.
5Carcass yield determined by dividing HCW at the plant by live BW at the farm prior to transport.
6HCW was used as a covariate.
7Effect of Cu within 100% SID Lys: P = 0.063.
8Effect of Cu within 92.5% SID Lys: P = 0.062.
9HCW ADG = (HCW – (day 0 wt × 75% yield)) ÷ 120 d.
10HCW G:F = (HCW – (day 0 wt × 75% yield)) ÷ (ADFI × 120).
11Samples were collected from three pigs from each pen.
12L*, 0 = black, 100 = white.
13a* − values = green; + values = red.
14b* − values = blue; + values = yellow.
15Hue angle = tan−1(b*/a*).
16Chroma = /L*.
17Calculated as iodine value = [C16:1] × 0.950 + [C18:1] × 0.860 + [C18:2] × 1.732 + [C18:3] × 2.616 + [C20:1] × 0.785 + [C20:4] × 3.201 + [C22:1] × 0.723 + [C22:5] × 3.697 + [C22:6] × 4.463; brackets indicate concentration. No evidence of main effects of Cu, Lys, or their interaction (P > 0.10) was observed for major FA, such as C16:0, C18:1, and C18:2 etc.; therefore, individual FA data were not shown.