Skip to main content
. 2018 May 12;96(7):2567–2578. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky172

Table 2.

Log likelihood (LogL) values and likelihood ratio test (LRT) of comparable models in the Yorkshire and Landrace CORE datasets

Trait1 Model2 LogL3 Compared4 LRT5 df6 P-value
Yorkshire
BW Model 1 7,223.8 1 vs. 4 1,985.8 2 <0.0001
Model 2 7,674.8 2 vs. 4 1,083.8 1 <0.0001
Model 3 8,130.2 3 vs. 4 173.0 1 <0.0001
Model 4 8,216.7
WW Model 1 −10,911.0 1 vs. 4 1,632.0 2 <0.0001
Model 2 −10,571.2 2 vs. 4 952.4 1 <0.0001
Model 3 −10,155.9 3 vs. 4 121.8 1 <0.0001
Model 4 −10,095.0
PW Model 1 −5,239.3 1 vs. 4 446.2 2 <0.0001
Model 2 −5,172.2 2 vs. 4 312.0 1 <0.0001
Model 3 −5,032.4 3 vs. 4 32.4 1 <0.0001
Model 4 −5,016.2
Landrace
BW Model 1 8,343.2 1 vs. 4 2,379.0 2 <0.0001
Model 2 9,028.7 2 vs. 4 1,008.0 1 <0.0001
Model 3 9,331.4 3 vs. 4 402.6 1 <0.0001
Model 4 9,532.7
WW Model 1 −10,300.2 1 vs. 4 1,691.2 2 <0.0001
Model 2 −9,997.3 2 vs. 4 1,085.4 1 <0.0001
Model 3 −9,531.2 3 vs. 4 153.2 1 <0.0001
Model 4 −9,454.6
PW Model 1 −5,823.0 1 vs. 4 607.6 2 <0.0001
Model 2 −5,709.3 2 vs. 4 380.2 1 <0.0001
Model 3 −5,552.7 3 vs. 4 67.0 1 <0.0001
Model 4 −5,519.2

1BW = birth weight; WW = weaning weight; PW = probe weight.

21. Direct additive genetic effect; 2. Direct additive genetic effect and maternal genetic effect; 3. Direct additive genetic effect and common litter effect; 4. Direct additive genetic, maternal genetic and common litter effect.

3LogL= Log likelihood.

4Compared reduced model (Models 1, 2, and 3) vs. full model (Model 4).

5LRT: X2 test statistic for the likelihood ratio test = −2 (LogLreduced model – LogLfull model).

6Degrees of freedom for the X2 test statistic.