Table 2:
Description of findings across curricula comparisons.
| Grantee | Treatment Curriculum | Control Curriculum(a) | Project-reported impacts | Pilot Year | Fidelity of Implementation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Literacy | Math | Socio-emotional | Treat | Control | ||||
|
I. Literacy vs. HighScope and Creative Curriculum | ||||||||
| University of North Florida | Early Literacy and Learning Model | Creative Curriculum | ns, ns, ns | ns, ns | ns, ns | Y | 2.5 | Not Provided |
| Florida State University | Literacy Express | HighScope | ns, ns, ns | ns, ns | ns, ns | 2.5 | 2 | |
| Florida State University | DLM Early Childhood Express supplemented with Open Court Reading Pre-K | HighScope | +,+,+ | +, ns | ns, ns | 2.3 | 2 | |
| University of California-Berkeley | Ready Set Leap | HighScope | ns, ns, ns | ns, − | ns, ns | 1.9 | 2 | |
| University of Virginia | Language Focused | HighScope | ns, ns, ns | ns, ns | ns, ns | 2 | 2 | |
|
II. Literacy vs. Locally-Developed Curriculum | ||||||||
| University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston | Doors to Discovery | Locally Developed | ns, ns, ns | ns, ns | ns, ns | Y | 2.1 | 1 |
| University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston | Let’s Begin with the Letter People | Locally Developed | ns, ns, ns | ns, ns | ns, ns | Y | 1.9 | 1 |
| Vanderbilt University | Bright Beginnings | Locally Developed | ns, ns, ns | ns, ns | ns, ns | Y | 1.9 | 2 |
|
III. Math vs. HighScope and Creative Curriculum | ||||||||
| University of California-Berkeley and SUNY University of Buffalo | Pre-K Mathematics supplemented with DLM Early Childhood Express (Math Software only) | Creative Curriculum or HighScope | ns, ns, ns | ns, + | ns, ns | Y | CA (2.7); NY (2.3) | CA (2.0); NY (2.0) |
|
IV. Creative Curriculum vs. Locally-Developed Curriculum | ||||||||
| University of North Carolina at Charlotte | Creative Curriculum | Locally Developed | ns, ns, ns | ns, ns | ns, ns | Y | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Vanderbilt University | Creative Curriculum | Locally Developed | ns, ns, ns | ns, ns | ns, ns | Y | 2.1 | 2 |
Note: “NS” = no significant impact of contrast on child skill, p>=.05; “+” = beneficial impact of experimental contrast on child skills with p<.05; '-' indicates detrimental impact with p<.05. Child outcomes are ordered as follows in the “Project-reported impacts” columns; “Literacy” outcomes include the PPVT, WJ Letter-Word and WJ Spelling; 'Math' outcomes include WJ Applied problems and CMAA; “Socioemotional” outcomes include social skills and problem behaviors; Fidelity of implementation was rated on a 4-point scale (0 = Not at all; 3 = High).