Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 16.
Published in final edited form as: Econ Educ Rev. 2018 May 4;65:107–125. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.05.001

Table 3.

Effects of treatment curricula on classroom observational measures at the end of preschool

ECERS total score TBRS Math TBRS Literacy Arnett total score

I. Literacy vs. HighScope and Creative Curriculum 0.25 −0.14 0.07 0.16
(0.15) (0.19) (0.20) (0.17)
N 860 840 840 850
Classroom N= 100
II. Literacy vs. Locally-Developed Curricula 0.56 0.47 0.78 0.28
(0.27) (0.36) (0.44) (0.25)
N 430 410 410 410
Classroom N=60
III. Math vs. HighScope and Creative Curriculum 0.21 1.19 0.38 0.67
(0.32) (0.53) (0.30) (0.51)
N 200 200 200 200
Classroom N=30
IV. Creative Curriculum vs. Locally-Developed Curricula 0.62 0.51 0.71 1.00
(0.32) (0.25) (0.23) (0.65)
N 340 320 320 330
Classroom N=30

Note. Each entry represents results from a separate regression. Standard errors clustered at the school level are in parentheses. Fixed effects at the random assignment site level are included in all analyses. Child and family controls included for child gender, race, age (months), baseline achievement and social skills; parent/primary caregiver education (years), whether working, age (years), annual household income (thousands), and whether receiving welfare. Classroom observational measures at baseline, time in days from the start of the preschool year and the date of the observational assessment, a quadratic version of this time in days, and the time in days between a classroom’s fall and spring observational assessment were also included for the estimates for the Arnett and ECERS. Duration of TBRS observation in minutes was included in TBRS Math and Literacy models. Missing dummy variables were included in the analyses to account for missing independent variables. Outcomes were standardized to have a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1. Ns are rounded to the nearest 10 in accordance with NCES data policies.