Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 20;6:57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2016.09.003

Table 2.

Study 1 and Study 2 video evaluation scores.

Variablea Study 1
Study 2
(N = 94)
Statistical
(n = 39)
Testimonial
(n = 32)
t df p
M (SD) M (SD) M (SD)
Clarity of information 4.05 (0.97) 3.94 (0.72) 0.552 68 0.58 4.29 (0.80)
New information 3.92 (0.78) 3.94 (0.89) − 0.071 67 0.94 4.15 (0.79)
Useful information 3.90 (0.82) 4.06 (0.77) − 0.869 68 0.38 4.26 (0.75)
Understand ICBT 3.67 (0.98) 3.90 (0.87) − 1.052 68 0.29 4.23 (0.73)
Organization of video 4.08 (0.80) 4.00 (0.77) 0.403 68 0.68 4.22 (0.74)
Visual appeal of video 4.03 (0.94) 3.74 (0.89) 1.275 67 0.20 4.01 (0.93)
Pace of video 3.95 (0.94) 3.90 (0.83) 0.211 68 0.83 4.05 (0.87)
Impression of video 4.00 (0.82) 4.00 (0.91) 0.000 69 1.00 4.17 (0.83)

ICBT = Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy; M = mean; SD = standard deviation.

a

Quality of video questions rated on a 1–5 scale; higher scores represent higher quality.