Table 3.
Study 1 and Study 2 perceptions of ICBT.
| Variable | Study 1d |
Study 2 (N = 94) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statistical (n = 39) |
Testimonial (n = 32) |
|||||
| Pre-video |
Post-video |
Pre-video |
Post-video |
Pre-video |
Post-video |
|
| M (SD) | M (SD) | M (SD) | M (SD) | M (SD) | M (SD) | |
| CEQ credibility subscalea | 19.02 (4.76) | 21.51 (4.90) | 19.15 (5.95) | 20.53 (6.54)** | 18.14 (6.58) | 20.93 (5.57)** |
| CEQ expectancy subscalea | 16.72 (5.38) | 18.04 (6.16) | 16.32 (5.41) | 17.61 (6.16)* | 15.53 (5.77) | 17.80 (6.05)** |
| Importance of ICBTb | 4.18 (0.79) | 4.49 (0.64) | 4.22 (0.70) | 4.69 (0.53)** | 3.74 (1.05) | 4.32 (0.81)** |
| Helpfulness of ICBTb | 4.03 (0.77) | 4.44 (0.64) | 3.81 (0.82) | 4.44 (0.66)** | 3.78 (0.92) | 4.28 (0.78)** |
| Interest in screenerc | 7.78 (2.66) | 9.28 (2.53) | 9.00 (1.36) | 9.97 (1.90)** | 7.68 (2.70) | 8.10 (2.74)** |
| Interest in ICBTc | 8.10 (2.65) | 9.46 (2.11) | 8.68 (2.19) | 9.97 (1.85) | 7.60 (2.70) | 8.09 (2.74)* |
ICBT = Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy; CEQ = Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire; M = mean; SD = standard deviation. *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001.
a
These subscales range in total scores from 3 to 27; higher scores represent greater credibility and expectancy, respectively.
b
These questions rated on a 1–5 scale; higher scores signify greater agreement.
c
These questions rated on a 1–10 scale; higher scores represent greater interest.
d
No main effects for condition or interactions between time and condition were found; significance values represent statistically significant main effects for time from pre- to post-video.