Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 16;8(15):4062–4071. doi: 10.7150/thno.24683

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Binding performance investigation of NTri-SAAP by flow cytometry, in comparison with SAAP monomer. (A) Binding stability of NTri-SAAP in different buffers. (B) Corresponding histogram of the normalized fluorescence ratios of CEM cells to Ramos cells for probes and buffers in (A). (C) Binding affinity comparison of NTri-SAAP and SAAP (the inset) against CEM cells.