Skip to main content
. 2018 May 30;74(Pt 6):506–518. doi: 10.1107/S2059798318007726

Table 2. Data-processing and refinement statistics for seven merged data sets.

Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.

Data processing
 Space group P21212
 Unit-cell parameters
   a, b, c (Å) 104.57, 67.62, 31.87
  α, β, γ (°) 90.00, 90.00, 90.00
 Resolution (Å) 56.78–2.10 (2.16–2.10)
R merge 0.313 (0.460)
R meas 0.356 (0.574)
R p.i.m. 0.160 (0.337)
 No. of observations 31650 (1504)
 Completeness (%) 59.2 (51.5)
 Multiplicity 3.9 (2.7)
 〈I/σ(I)〉 3.0 (1.9)
 CC1/2 (%) 90.9 (62.6)
Refinement
 Space group P21212
 Unit-cell parameters
   a, b, c (Å) 104.45, 67.54, 31.84
  α, β, γ (°) 90.00, 90.00, 90.00
 Resolution (Å) 56.72–2.10
 No. of reflections 8143
R1§ (%) 25.2
R complete (%) 29.2
 〈B〉 (Å2) 18.3
 R.m.s.Z, bond lengths 0.48
 R.m.s.Z, bond angles 0.72
 Ramachandran (favoured/allowed/outliers) (%) 97.6/2.0/0.4

Individual data sets 1–7 were truncated at CC1/2 ≥ 50% and 〈I/σ(I)〉 ≥ 1.0 (Diederichs & Karplus, 2013); the merged data set was limited to 2.1 Å resolution based on the model-refinement results.

Unit-cell dimensions after lattice-parameter refinement in REFMAC5 (Murshudov et al., 2011).

§

R1 = Inline graphic Inline graphic, where the sum includes all data.

R complete is a robust validation method, especially in cases where the data completeness is limited, making use of all reflections (Brünger, 1997), and R work is thus equivalent to R1. R complete was calculated with a 0.2% test set size as described in Luebben & Gruene (2015) and Clabbers et al. (2017).