Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 17;50(4):1694–1715. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1041-8

Table 1.

Reliabilities of different scales

Model Scale Cut Points Cronbach’s Alpha
Latent Variable 1 (SE) Latent Variable 2 (SE) Latent Variable 3 (SE) Latent Variable 4 (SE)
4L4I VAS-RRP scale .713 (.022) .796 (.015) .736 (.020) .811 (.014)
Likert-type scales {– 2, 2} .482 (.046) .612 (.035) .518 (.044) .638 (.031)
{– 1, 1} .637 (.027) .728 (.020) .663 (.025) .746 (.019)
{– 3, – 1,1,3} .651 (.026) .745 (.018) .677 (.025) .763 (.018)
{– 1.5, – 0.5, 0.5, 1.5} .685 (.024) .770 (.016) .709 (.022) .785 (.016)
4L8I VAS-RRP scale .820 (.011) .873 (.008) .836 (.011) .882 (.007)
Likert-type scales {– 3, – 1, 1,3} .778 (.014) .842 (.010) .796 (.014) .853 (.009)
{– 1.5, – 0.5, 0.5, 1.5} .802 (.012) .857 (.008) .817 (.012) .866 (.008)

Values are mean values after 500 simulations. SE = standard error. VAS-RRP = Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking, and Paired-Comparison. #L = number of latent variables. #I = number of items.