Table 2.
Descriptive statistics and correlations among toy desirability judgments, gender-typing of toys, and gender role attitudes
| Variables | M (SD) | 95% CI | Correlations | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
| 1. Desirability of same-gender-typed toys | 5.15 (1.16) | [5.02, 5.28] | – | −.22** | .20** | .09 | −.07 |
| 2. Desirability of cross-gender-typed toys | 3.14 (1.45) | [2.98, 3.30] | – | .41** | −.42** | −.18** | |
| 3. Desirability of gender-neutral toys | 5.30 (1.13) | [5.18, 5.42] | – | −.22** | −.18** | ||
| 4. Gender-typing of toys | 71.38 (13.72) | [69.88, 72.88] | – | .41** | |||
| 5. NGRO | 2.98 (.96) | [2.88, 3.09] | – | ||||
NGRO = Normative Gender Role Attitudes. Desirability judgments range from 1 to 7, with higher values indicating higher desirability of a given type of toy; Gender-typing scores range from 1 to 100, with higher values indicating stronger gender-typing of toys; NGRO scores range from 1 to 7, with higher values indicating more traditional gender role attitudes. Toy desirability judgments and gender-typing of toys are converted scores
**p < .01