Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 13;79(5):329–341. doi: 10.1007/s11199-017-0882-4

Table 3.

Toy desirability judgments, gender-typing of toys, and gender role attitudes by parent’s and child's gender

Variables Gender of parent Gender of child M (SD) n
Desirability of same-gender-typed toys Female Male 5.01 (1.25) 120
Female 5.34 (1.09) 136
Total 5.18 (1.18) 256
Male Male 4.85 (1.11) 35
Female 5.19 (1.07) 33
Total 5.01 (1.09) 68
Total Male 4.97 (1.22) 155
Female 5.31 (1.08) 169
Total 5.15 (1.16) 324
Desirability of cross-gender-typed toys Female Male 3.36 (1.47) 120
Female 2.93 (1.41) 136
Total 3.13 (1.45) 256
Male Male 3.30 (1.54) 35
Female 3.01 (1.40) 33
Total 3.16 (1.47) 68
Total Male 3.35 (1.48) 155
Female 2.95 (1.40) 169
Total 3.14 (1.45) 324
Desirability of gender-neutral toys Female Male 5.25 (1.17) 120
Female 5.48 (1.09) 136
Total 5.37 (1.13) 256
Male Male 4.81 (1.29) 35
Female 5.28 (.82) 33
Total 5.04 (1.10) 68
Total Male 5.15 (1.21) 155
Female 5.44 (1.04) 169
Total 5.30 (1.13) 324
Gender-typing of toys Female Male 71.46 (13.56) 120
Female 70.82 (13.78) 136
Total 71.12 (13.65) 256
Male Male 71.88 (14.31) 35
Female 72.92 (13.98) 33
Total 72.39 (14.06) 68
Total Male 71.55 (13.69) 155
Female 71.23 (13.80) 169
Total 71.38 (13.72) 324
NGRO Female Male 2.83 (.90) 120
Female 2.99 (.95) 136
Total 2.91 (.93) 256
Male Male 3.06 (.97) 35
Female 3.39 (1.14) 33
Total 3.22 (1.06) 68
Total Male 2.88 (.92) 155
Female 3.07 (1.00) 169
Total 2.98 (.96) 324

NGRO = Normative Gender Role Attitudes. Desirability judgments range from 1 to 7, with higher values indicating higher desirability of a given type of toy; Gender-typing scores range from 1 to 100, with higher values indicating stronger gender-typing of toys; NGRO scores range from 1 to 7, with higher values indicating more traditional gender role attitudes. The smallest cell size was 33 for fathers thinking of daughters. Toy desirability judgments and gender-typing of toys are converted scores