Abstract
Anxiety disorders are the most common cause of mental ill health in the developed world, but our understanding of symptoms and treatments is not presently grounded in knowledge of the underlying neurobiological mechanisms. In this review, we discuss accumulating work that points to a role for prefrontal–subcortical brain circuitry in driving a core psychological symptom of anxiety disorders – negative affective bias. Specifically, we point to converging work across humans and animal models, suggesting a reciprocal relationship between dorsal and ventral prefrontal–amygdala circuits in promoting and inhibiting negative bias, respectively. We discuss how the developmental trajectory of these circuits may lead to the onset of anxiety during adolescence and, moreover, how effective pharmacological and psychological treatments may serve to shift the balance of activity within this circuitry to ameliorate negative bias symptoms. Together, these findings may bring us closer to a mechanistic, neurobiological understanding of anxiety disorders and their treatment.
Keywords: Anxiety, circuit, negative bias, prefrontal cortex
Introduction
Anxiety disorders are the most common cause of mental illness in the developed world, with large social, economic and psychological impacts (DiLuca and Olesen, 2014; Shin and Liberzon, 2009; Vos et al., 2016). A propensity towards the development of anxiety disorders is heritable (Hettema et al., 2005), often begins in childhood or adolescence (Beesdo et al., 2009; Pine, 2007) and persists into adulthood (Copeland et al., 2014; Craske et al., 2017). It is estimated that close to one in four people will suffer from an anxiety disorder – including generalised anxiety (GAD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), social anxiety or phobias – in their lifetime (Kessler et al., 2005, 2012), but currently available psychological and pharmacological treatments are effective for less than half of these individuals (Roy-Byrne, 2015; Community and Mental Health team, 2014) and progress in the discovery of anxiolytic drugs has been slow (Griebel and Holmes, 2013). One reason for this treatment gap is that we have a limited understanding of the biological mechanisms by which anxiety symptoms emerge or how these mechanisms are modulated by our current interventions. As such, we struggle to develop new treatments that can modulate known biological targets. Moreover, it is increasingly clear that our current diagnoses, based largely on self-reported symptoms, do not map clearly onto underlying biology or indeed onto the latent structure of the self-reported symptoms themselves (Cuthbert and Insel, 2013; Kotov et al., 2017). Indeed, factor analyses suggest that many categorical disorders consist of shared symptoms which are similar manifestations of relatively few underlying dimensions (Caspi et al., 2014; Clark et al., 2017; Kaczkurkin et al., 2017; Kotov et al., 2017; Krueger and Eaton, 2015; Lahey et al., 2012, 2017).
Recent efforts such as the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC; Insel et al., 2010), therefore, attempt to re-frame the investigation of psychiatric disorders by advocating a trans-diagnostic approach focusing on the neurobiological mechanisms underpinning symptoms that cut across traditional categorical diagnoses. In particular, one domain within the RDoC, Negative Valence Systems, includes responses to aversive situations such as fear, anxiety, sustained threat and loss (/reward omission) that overlap with a key concept from the clinical psychology literature – negative affective bias. Negative biases in cognition are thought to promote and uphold key symptoms of many psychiatric conditions but are especially prominent in anxiety disorders, perpetuated by anticipation of – and uncertainty about – future events (Grupe and Nitschke, 2011, 2013). Although none of our current treatments or diagnoses are based on a mechanistic neurobiological understanding of negative bias, recent work has begun to delineate the role that interactions between the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and subcortical regions such as the amygdala play in the manifestation of negative bias in anxiety. It is this circuitry that is the focus of the present review.
Negative bias in anxiety
Anxiety disorders are characterised by a general ‘negative bias’ in both attention and memory towards affectively negative (/threatening/aversive) information that promotes and upholds the anxious state while having knock-on effects in a wide range of other cognitive functions (e.g. learning, inhibitory control; Craske et al., 2017; Robinson et al., 2013a). It has been widely shown, for instance, that people with anxiety tend to interpret neutral information in a more negative light, have maladaptive attention biases towards threat even when threats are not immediately present or relevant (this may be particularly prominent in some subtypes of anxiety such as social anxiety disorder; Abend et al., 2017) and have a bias towards learning about negative information (Abend et al., 2017; Hakamata et al., 2010; Monk et al., 2006; Okon-Singer and Aue, 2017; Roy et al., 2008). It is of course possible to break negative biases into specific subtypes of bias (for a comprehensive attempt to do this, see Grupe and Nitschke, 2013), but here we aim to build a broad preliminary model across disparate animal and human experimental data, along with clinical data, with the goal of drawing holistic conclusions. Similarly, the term negative bias of course encompasses myriad constructs, including a distinction made by many researchers between fear and anxiety (Davis et al., 2010), as well as subcategories of learned versus prepotent fears (LeDoux, 2000; Phelps et al., 2004). However, in this review, we broadly focus across the Negative Valence Systems domain of the RDoC (Insel et al., 2010) in an attempt to identify common patterns and build a simple model of how negative bias is generated at the neurobiological level. If we were to be too fine-grained in our definitions of negative bias, we will find ourselves with multiple non-overlapping studies, which would limit interpretation.
To demonstrate our aim of bridging disparate experimental literature and clinical utility, consider Beck’s (1967) early theory of elevated negative bias (or ‘negative schemata’). In this framework, Beck proposed a cognitive triad illustrating a cycle among a negative view of the world, the self and the future. This model encompasses wide-ranging cognitive functions from memory to attention but nonetheless forms the basis of successful psychological treatments such as cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), highlighting potential advantages in taking a broad approach to linking cognitive research with clinical practice.
We therefore review converging evidence across humans and animal models suggesting that negative bias may arise, at least in part, from activity within prefrontal regions and their interactions with subcortical regions (Etkin and Wager, 2007; Shin and Liberzon, 2009). These circuits may underpin the ability to engage or disengage attention from threats and may be critical to understanding the mechanistic basis of negative bias as well as its development and treatment (Aue and Okon-Singer, 2015; Cisler and Koster, 2010; Dodd et al., 2017).
Animal models of negative bias
Research falling within the Negative Valence Systems domain of RDoC in animal models often makes a distinction between fear and anxiety. In the psychological literature, anxiety is defined as a prolonged state of heightened anticipatory arousal, often prompted by distal or unpredictable threats (Davis et al., 2010). Fear, on the contrary, is conceptualised as a ‘fight or flight’ reaction and typically involves active defence against immediate threat, usually dissipating upon removal of the threat. In ‘real-world’ terms, a person’s reaction to a spider on the table in front of them might elicit a fear response (which may be exacerbated in cases of phobia), whereas the knowledge that a spider might be in the room but uncertainty of its location might elicit anxiety. Elevations in both responses could of course play a key role in driving negative affective bias (although see Fox and Shackman, 2017; Shackman and Fox, 2016, for suggestions of why this explicit distinction between fear and anxiety might be problematic with regard to the underlying neurobiology).
Animal models are particularly useful in the investigation of the neural basis of anxiety and fear because of their cross-species overlap in the neural circuitry underlying these processes (Davis, 2000; LeDoux, 2000); cross-species functional homologues of brain circuitry can inform translational research across humans and rodents and can provide testable models, even if the circuits themselves are not directly conserved across species. For instance, startle response, in which whole-body jump is typically used as an index in rodents, is paralleled by an eye-blink response in humans (Davis, 2001) and is a reliable experimental measure of aversive responding on some cognitive tasks (Aylward and Robinson, 2017) but not necessarily on others (Bradford et al., 2015). This startle reflex is heightened by both fear and anxiety states across rats and humans (Grillon and Davis, 2007; Grillon et al., 1991), but the subcortical circuitry responsible may differ (Robinson et al., 2012a). Specifically, fear responses are associated with the central amygdala, anxiety responses are associated with the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and both fear and anxiety responses are associated with the basolateral amygdala (BLA; Davis et al., 2010; Sengupta et al., 2017; Tovote et al., 2015), although this distinction has been challenged and warrants further investigation (Gungor and Paré, 2016; Shackman and Fox, 2016). Nevertheless, taken together, rodent and human work points to the clear role of subcortical regions, and the extended amygdala in particular (along with its inter-connections and external projections), in driving aversive/fear responding and hence negative bias (Boeke et al., 2017; Campese et al., 2015, 2017; Sengupta et al., 2017; Terburg et al., 2012; Tovote et al., 2015).
However, regions of the brain rarely, if ever, work in isolation. Within the hierarchy of neural processing, these subcortical regions also interact with ‘higher’ cortical areas. This is perhaps best illustrated by work exploring the weakening of learned aversive responses during extinction. During fear extinction, a cue which previously indicated the onset of an aversive event no longer predicts a negative outcome, so the individual must ‘extinguish’ their original aversive response. Animal models of conditioned fear extinction indeed implicate subcortical regions such as the BLA, but they extend the circuitry to encompass medial prefrontal cortical regions as well. In particular, within the rodent PFC, subdivisions of the infralimbic (IL) and the prelimbic (PL) have been posited to play distinct roles in the expression and extinction of conditioned fear, with the IL supporting fear extinction as expressed by the amygdala and the PL conversely promoting fear expression as expressed by the amygdala (Klavir et al., 2017; Morgan and LeDoux, 1995; Sierra-Mercado et al., 2011; Vidal-Gonzalez et al., 2006). In monkeys, activity in the dorsal anterior cingulate (dACC) is correlated with the BLA during fear learning and memory acquisition (Klavir et al., 2013; Livneh and Paz, 2012), and in rodents, PL response to cues predicting an aversive event increases post-fear learning (Burgos-Robles et al., 2009). Using pharmacological or electrical stimulation and optogenetic approaches, it has been shown that, on the other hand, increased activity in the rodent IL predicts fear extinction in the amygdala (Do-Monte et al., 2015; Klavir et al., 2017; Milad and Quirk, 2002, 2012). Having said that, recent rodent work has suggested that this dissociation may not be as clear-cut as previously thought. For example, the role of the IL in fear extinction has been challenged in optogenetics work showing that extinction recall was intact after the silencing of IL neurons and that stimulation of ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) inputs to the amygdala facilitated extinction memory formation but not retrieval (Bukalo et al., 2015; Do-Monte et al., 2015). Moreover, the distinction between PL/dorsal and IL/ventral prefrontal regions being responsible for fear expression and suppression, respectively, has been challenged (Giustino and Maren, 2015). For instance, rodent work has shown that these regions have structurally similar projections to the amygdala (Cho et al., 2013; Gutman et al., 2012; Hübner et al., 2014; Pinard et al., 2012), and functionally dichotomous distinctions between these regions have been shown in the opposite direction than was initially postulated (Chang et al., 2010).
This rodent research nevertheless highlights a key potential mechanism of negative bias; namely that the overall expression of aversive responding may be held in the balance of opposing circuitry. Thus, whether negative bias is expressed or dampened may depend on whether one of these circuits is able to override the other, with sub-regions of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) playing a key role in arbitrating this response. Indeed, across a range of paradigms in rodents, the PFC has been shown to play a regulatory role over BLA activation during fear expression, social interaction and anxiety-related behaviours (Bickart et al., 2014; Bremner, 2004; Davis, 1998; Felix-Ortiz et al., 2013; Janak and Tye, 2015; Kling and Steklis, 1976).
That said, the implicit implication that the PFC is a ‘top-down’ regulator of the amygdala during fear extinction should be challenged. Optogenetics research in rodents has shown bi-directional effects of modulating BLA projections to the IL and PL during a number of behavioural assays assessing anxiety-like behaviour (Courtin et al., 2014; Felix-Ortiz et al., 2016; Herry et al., 2008; Laviolette et al., 2005). Specifically, BLA activity projecting up to PL regions is increased during fear conditioning (Senn et al., 2014), while fear extinction also enhances activity in BLA projections up to the IL (Milad and Quirk, 2002; Senn et al., 2014). Moreover, recordings from non-human primates further support this bi-directional effect during fear learning (Klavir et al., 2013). In other words, it is not so much that the PFC ‘regulates’ the amygdala but rather the reciprocal relationship of information flow between these regions in a circuit that drives the overall output.
Collectively, animal work therefore suggests a putative neural mechanism of negative bias; one (bi-directional PL–amygdala) circuit may serve to facilitate negative bias, while another (bi-directional IL–amygdala) circuit may serve to suppress negative bias (Calhoon and Tye, 2015). This simplified heuristic provides a framework with which to consider neurobiological research in anxious humans.
Neurobiological basis of negative bias in humans
Perhaps unusually for a symptom related to psychiatric disorder, negative bias in anxiety can be adaptive. For example, when one is walking home late at night and hears an unexpected noise down a dark alley, an appraisal of this situation as potentially threatening raises awareness, preparing the body’s fight or flight response in the event of immediate danger. In other words, negative bias in anxiety can promote harm avoidance. However, if this heightened anxiety and negative bias does not subside when one is subsequently safe at home, this response becomes maladaptive and can impair daily functioning (i.e. it transitions into a pathological state). Thus, it was suggested by the pioneers of CBT that a biased appraisal of threat (i.e. negative bias) leading to catastrophising or excessive worry is a central characteristic of anxiety disorders (Beck and Clark, 1997). Dorsal regions of the PFC (dorsomedial PFC (dmPFC) and dACC) seem to be associated with this behavioural response at the neural level; these regions are activated during conscious threat appraisal in healthy individuals and have been shown to be overactive during threat appraisal in pathological anxiety (for review, see Kalisch and Gerlicher, 2014).
Consistent with the animal work highlighted above, pathological negative bias in humans may in fact result in part from an inability to extinguish conditioned fear responses driven in turn by this altered, worry-related PFC responding (Milad et al., 2007; Rothbaum and Davis, 2003). Healthy subjects show increased activation in the vmPFC during acquisition and retrieval of extinction (Kalisch et al., 2006; Milad and Rauch, 2007; Phelps et al., 2004), which has led to the suggestion that this region in the human brain might be functionally (albeit perhaps not structurally) homologous to the rodent IL. On the other hand, patients with anxiety disorders have shown reduced activation in the vmPFC along with increased activation in the dACC, leading to the suggestion that the dACC might be functionally homologous to the rodent PL (Milad et al., 2009).
Consistent with this proposition, at the neural level, the dACC and adjacent dmPFC have been implicated in the appraisal and expression of fear (Etkin et al., 2011; Vogt, 2005), as well as the anticipation of emotional stimuli (Erk et al., 2006). Moreover, Kalisch and Gherlicher (2014) argue that the dACC/dmPFC can be further subdivided into an anterior part, the rostral dACC/dmPFC and a posterior part, with the rostral but not posterior part implicated in conscious threat appraisal and worry (Kalisch and Gerlicher, 2014; Mechias et al., 2010). Thus, activity in dorsal PFC regions is broadly associated with increased negative bias. The dACC has also been linked to the adaptive control of behaviour as well as the risk of development of anxiety disorders (Cavanagh et al., 2017; Goodkind et al., 2015; McTeague et al., 2017; Meyer, 2017).
Regarding ventral regions, studies in healthy adults (Bishop, 2007) as well as adults (Etkin and Wager, 2007; Milad et al., 2007; Price and Drevets, 2012) and children and adolescents (Guyer et al., 2008; Monk et al., 2006; Strawn et al., 2012) with anxiety disorders have shown abnormal function in orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and ventrolateral PFC (VLPFC). The cause and effect of such abnormalities have been studied in non-human primates through lesions to the anterior OFC and VLPFC (Agustín-Pavón et al., 2012; Izquierdo and Murray, 2005; Kalin et al., 2007; Machado and Bachevalier, 2008), with findings largely showing increased anxiety during fear conditioning paradigms when these regions are lesioned. Thus, broadly speaking, activity in ventral cortical regions is associated with reduced negative bias (although it should be noted that this association may not be as consistent as previously thought (cf. Shackman et al., 2011).
The hippocampus is another structure that has been hypothesised to play a critical role in the pathophysiology of anxiety. Specifically, this region is a key mediator of the acquisition and expression of learned fear, as demonstrated by a number of early lesion studies showing that hippocampal lesions dampened fear response to previous learned associations (Kim and Fanselow, 1992; Phillips and LeDoux, 1992; Selden et al., 1991). Studies in both human and rodents suggest that this region integrates contextual information during fear conditioning and may regulate context-dependent recall after extinction (Giustino and Maren, 2015). The rodent PL and IL receive excitatory inputs from both the dorsal and ventral hippocampus (Little and Carter, 2013), and it has been suggested that, similar to the amygdala, these projections may inhibit downstream mPFC outputs (Sotres-Bayon et al., 2012). In humans, Linnman et al. (2011) demonstrated that fear (elicited by electric shock expectation) was associated with increased connectivity between the hippocampus and the vmPFC, and decreased connectivity between the hippocampus and the red nucleus midbrain region, suggesting that the hippocampus may facilitate a switch between what they term a ‘fear’ network and a ‘resting’ network.
However, as highlighted by the rodent literature above, negative bias is not so much driven by regions acting in isolation. Rather, it is the cortical–subcortical circuitry that is important for anxiety response. For example, Kalin et al. (2016) used a viral vector approach in primates to demonstrate a relationship between overexpression of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) in the dorsal amygdala and increased defensive behaviour during exposure to threat. Moreover, this link between metabolism and behaviour has also been observed in rodents and was associated with functional connectivity between the dorsal amygdala and OFC (Regev et al., 2012). To this end, connectivity between the dACC/dmPFC and the amygdala has been implicated in the pathophysiology of anxiety in humans. Structurally, the integrity of white matter tracts between the amygdala and the PFC has been shown to predict individual differences in trait anxiety (Kim and Whalen, 2009). Functionally, Robinson et al. (2012a) studied the role of these regions in negative bias during induced anxiety in healthy individuals. They found that connectivity increased during the processing of threatening stimuli (fearful faces) selectively in the context of induced anxiety. Moreover, the strength of this connectivity was positively correlated with participants’ subjective ratings of anxiety, as well as the extent of negative bias in behavioural responding (as indexed by a threat-by-valence interaction in reaction times, driven by a valence-specific reduced reaction time to fearful faces under threat vs safe conditions), suggesting a key mediating role for dACC/dmPFC–amygdala circuitry in driving negative bias. Critically, coupling within this same circuitry was shown to be elevated at baseline in individuals with an anxiety disorder (Robinson et al., 2014; in the absence of induced anxiety), suggesting that the same circuitry which can be selectively engaged and disengaged in healthy controls is more persistently engaged in patients with clinical anxiety, thereby providing a route by which adaptive anxiety can transition into a maladaptive state. Across both studies, however, the correlation between the amygdala and dorsal cortical regions was positive. In other words, activity in the dorsal cortical regions increases as activity increases in the amygdala and vice versa. The role that this circuit seems to play in threat responding therefore appears somewhat analogous to the role of the PL in rodents. Thus, a human functional homologue of the rodent PL–amygdala circuit may drive increased threat responding and negative affective biases in anxiety disorders.
However, rodent work has also highlighted the contrasting role of the inhibitory IL circuit (Kim et al., 2011a). To this end, another study in humans (Vytal et al., 2014) expanded this putative circuitry to encompass a reciprocal inhibitory circuit. Specifically, inducing anxiety during an adapted resting-state scan replicated positive dmPFC–amygdala coupling, but at the same time enhanced negative coupling between a ventral medial prefrontal region and the amygdala. In other words, while increased dorsal activation was associated with increased amygdala activation, increased ventral activation was associated with decreased amygdala activity (Vytal et al., 2014). Earlier positron emission tomography (PET) studies in humans have shown similarly contrasting relationships between prefrontal and subcortical regions (Linnman et al., 2012a, 2012b). For example, during extinction training, resting amygdala metabolism positively predicted vmPFC activation and negatively predicted dACC activation, but during extinction recall, these relationships were in the opposite direction (Linnman et al., 2012a). In a rodent study investigating the impact of early-life environmental stress, Johnson et al. (2018) showed that stress was related to increased amygdala–PFC and amygdala–hippocampus coupling and that this connectivity was related to anxiety-like behaviours in a translational model of early-life stress. Thus, these studies demonstrate that the relationship between distinct mPFC regions may have opposing effects on aversive responding. Another study of resting-state functional connectivity in healthy humans showed that those individuals who reported high levels of anxiety were characterised by negatively correlated amygdala–vmPFC connectivity, while this connectivity was positively correlated in those reporting low levels of anxiety (Kim et al., 2011b). Moreover, amygdala–dmPFC connectivity was negatively correlated only in those reporting low anxiety. More dorsal regions of the PFC (like the PL in rodents) may increase aversive responding, while more ventral regions (like the IL in rodents) may reduce aversive responding. Moreover, the nature of these functional imaging connectivity analyses means that they are non-directional. In other words, it is not possible to say whether one region is driving the other – it is simply a correlation. Given the bi-directional nature of the rodent work highlighted above, these circuits therefore should not be considered ‘top-down’ or ‘bottom-up’; rather, the overall reciprocal cortical–subcortical interaction likely drives the ultimate behavioural expression.
Together, these findings highlight the value of translational research. A model of cortical–subcortical interactions during negative bias inspired by rodent work provides a framework within which to consider the role of neural circuitry in negative bias in humans.
Development
The work reviewed above therefore suggests that medial prefrontal–amygdala interactions may drive the negative bias symptoms that are a core feature of anxiety disorders. However, how these mechanisms develop and persist across the lifespan remains unclear. If we want to target these symptoms and intervene early, it is important to determine when and how alterations to these circuits emerge.
Within the general population, pathological anxiety commonly emerges during childhood or adolescence and reflects a combination of genetic factors and early-life experiences (Pine, 2007). ‘Anxious temperament’ is considered to be a stable trait across time, and those with extreme levels of such traits are at a higher risk for developing clinical or pathological anxiety (Arnaudova et al., 2013; Jones, 2013; Nugent et al., 2011). Similarly, the stable traits of ‘behavioural inhibition’, a temperament characterised by a tendency to withdraw from new situations (Kagan et al., 1987; Svihra and Katzman, 2004) and, more broadly, ‘dispositional negativity’ (Shackman et al., 2016) are thought to be early phenotypes of anxiety disorders. There is evidence that anxiety-related amygdala abnormalities and affected top-down prefrontal regulation originate early in development (Clauss and Blackford, 2012; Kalin, 2017). Moreover, it has been estimated that 50% of children showing increased behavioural inhibition in childhood will later develop stress-related psychopathology (Clauss and Blackford, 2012). This is paralleled by findings of reduced amygdala–dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) coupling in preadolescent children diagnosed with an anxiety disorder as well as in young non-human primates with elevated levels of traits related to anxious temperament (including heightened behavioural inhibition; Birn et al., 2014). Although more longitudinal studies are needed to confirm this, this evidence suggests that rapid changes in the mPFC and the later maturation of amygdala–cortical connections during adolescence, a period recently suggested to encompass 10–24 years of age (Sawyer et al., 2018), may contribute to the emergence of anxiety during a specific developmental window (Andersen, 2003; Casey et al., 2008). Indeed, prospective studies in humans (Giedd et al., 1999; Jones et al., 2017; Kalin, 2017; Swartz and Monk, 2013) as well as rodent studies (Arruda-Carvalho et al., 2017; Cohen et al., 2013; Gee et al., 2013a; Pattwell et al., 2016) have shown that this period constitutes a window of heightened risk for the development of anxiety. However, vast structural brain changes have also been observed during childhood, suggesting that children are subject to a heightened vulnerability to environmental impacts which may influence the development of anxiety even before the onset of adolescence. Indeed, behaviourally inhibited temperament has been observed in young children who later develop anxiety, with similar neural circuitry alterations linking these phenotypes (Buzzell et al., 2017; Gold et al., 2016; Sylvester et al., 2016).
One influential idea common to the human and rodent developmental literature is that learned fear associations (i.e. memories) from early life are important contributing factors to the subsequent development of anxiety disorders (Britton et al., 2011; Glenn et al., 2012; Jacobs and Nadel, 1985). Cross-species animal work (Harlow and Harlow, 1965; Hess et al., 1962) has shown that fear learning is characterised by approach behaviour (such as maternal attachment or odour approach) in infants, but is characterised by almost diametrically opposed avoidance behaviour (such as maternal or odour avoidance or avoidance of elevated/open areas in typical rodent paradigms) in adults (for an extensive review, see Ganella and Kim, 2014). This also suggests that at some point during development, there is a change in the underlying neurobiology promoting this behaviour.
Integrating this within the circuitry framework of the present review, Chan et al. (2011) inactivated PL in juvenile, preadolescent and adult rats and found that PL inactivation significantly reduced freezing behaviour, as would be predicted by the above reviewed evidence, but that it only did so in adolescent and adult rats, suggesting that the role of different medial prefrontal regions in negative bias changes across development. In other words, differences in fear responding, mediated by amygdala–medial prefrontal pathways, may partially be a result of a more protracted course of development and reorganisation in these cortical–subcortical pathways (Arruda-Carvalho et al., 2017; Ganella and Kim, 2014; LeDoux, 2000; Pattwell et al., 2016). Similar developmental changes in prefrontal–subcortical negative bias circuitry are also seen in humans; in typically developing humans, mPFC–amygdala connections are immature during childhood and strengthen to adult levels during adolescence (Gee et al., 2013a, 2013b), and structural changes in white matter have been shown to mediate amygdala function in adolescents (Swartz et al., 2014). Moreover, early perturbations in medial prefrontal circuitry have been implicated in the development of anxiety and depression. For example, a preliminary study in adolescents with depression found that patients had decreased functional connectivity in a subgenual (ventral) anterior cingulate (ACC)-based network compared to healthy adolescents (Cullen et al., 2009). Moreover, negative coupling within vmPFC–amygdala circuitry during fear extinction was recently shown only in adults and not adolescents (Ganella et al., 2017). These ventral regions may reflect overlapping human homologues of the rodent IL. Thus, a developmental delay in the ability to engage the circuitry that can dampen negative bias might explain the emergence of anxiety disorders during adolescence. This work is in its infancy, but the concept of reciprocal cortical–subcortical circuits again provides a framework with which to consider the emergence of anxiety and negative bias during development.
Treatment
If prefrontal–subcortical circuitry is critical in the development and manifestation of negative bias, then modulation of this circuitry should serve to modify negative affective biases and hence treat symptoms. The first-line treatments for clinical anxiety are serotonergic medication and psychological therapy. Emerging evidence suggests that successful response to both types of treatment may also depend on this prefrontal–subcortical circuitry.
The role of serotonin in pharmacological treatment
Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)) has long been implicated in the neuropsychopharmacology of anxiety (Dayan and Huys, 2009; Harmer et al., 2009, 2011), largely because selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the most common and effective pharmacological treatment for anxiety disorders (Harmer et al., 2009, 2011). It is thought that serotonin plays a particular role in maintaining the balance between the processing of appetitive and aversive information (Cools et al., 2008; Crockett et al., 2009; Robinson et al., 2012b) and more precisely in the inhibition of PFC-linked neural circuitry important for driving negative bias (Crockett et al., 2009; Robinson et al., 2013b).
The impact of serotonin in healthy humans can be studied by acute tryptophan depletion – a dietary manipulation that temporarily reduces serotonin levels (Crockett et al., 2012). Reduced serotonin has been shown to increase positive coupling within the same circuit shown to be elevated by induced anxiety (Vytal et al., 2014) and at baseline in individuals with an anxiety disorder (Robinson et al., 2014), suggesting that serotonergic drugs (which putatively elevate serotonin availability) may work by reducing activity within this dorsal prefrontal circuit (Robinson et al., 2013b), thus reducing negative bias. By contrast, a study using a different paradigm showed that tryptophan depletion can also decrease coupling between the amygdala and a more ventral prefrontal region (Passamonti et al., 2012). Moreover, direct reductions in ventrally located orbitofrontal serotonin in the marmoset can increase negative bias (Rygula et al., 2015). Within the framework described above, this suggests that serotonin can also serve to promote ventral PFC circuits that inhibit aversive processing while inhibiting dorsal PFC circuits that promote aversive responding. As such, pharmacological treatments may work by restoring the balance between the circuits that, respectively, promote and inhibit negative bias. Recent work also suggests that the influence of serotonergic drugs on this circuitry might be mediated by genetic factors (Perna et al., 2005; Santangelo et al., 2016), which may in turn explain why such medications only work for a subset of anxious patients.
Psychological treatment
CBT is the most common psychological intervention used to treat anxiety and is based on the premise that negative biases in thoughts and actions can be shifted through cognitive reappraisal and emotion regulation strategies (Beck and Clark, 1997). There have been numerous studies (see review by Brooks and Stein, 2015) which suggest that CBT modulates prefrontal–subcortical interactions. Indeed, baseline medial prefrontal and amygdala activity might even predict treatment response to CBT in anxiety (Klumpp et al., 2017). For instance, Shou et al. (2017) showed that functional connectivity between the amygdala and the fronto-parietal network increased in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) or PTSD who underwent a course of CBT compared to controls, supporting a mechanism by which this circuitry may interact with psychological intervention (although it should be noted that this study did not include a patient group that did not undergo CBT, so the specificity of these results is difficult to quantify). Similarly, a study of adolescents with anxiety assessed whether CBT combined with attention bias modification therapy (ABMT) was more clinically effective than CBT alone and whether this treatment response could be predicted through pre-treatment amygdala-based functional connectivity (White et al., 2017). This study found that patients differed from controls in amygdala–insula connectivity on a threat attention task. Moreover, while both CBT groups showed clinical improvement, the combined CBT + ABMT group showed the greatest reduction in symptoms and that baseline amygdala functional connectivity differentially predicted the level of treatment response in patients.
However, whether these changes in cortical–subcortical circuits are driven by CBT, or whether they simply reflect reduced overall anxiety and negative bias per se, is unclear. To this end, basic research has attempted to determine causality. Specifically, it has been shown that in healthy individuals, simple attentional instruction can alter the engagement of affective-bias-related dmPFC–amygdala circuitry (Robinson et al., 2016). When subjects are instructed to pay attention to neutral aspects of compound cues (rather than the affectively salient components of the same cues), anxiety-induced amygdala–dmPFC coupling (as seen above; Robinson et al., 2012a) is down-regulated. This suggests that psychological treatments such as CBT may reduce negative bias by down-regulating the dorsal PFC–amygdala circuitry that promotes negative bias. In the context of threat processing, there has been limited work showing whole-brain increased ventrolateral prefrontal activation in anxious youth who underwent CBT relative to controls (Maslowsky et al., 2010), as well as reduced dorsomedial prefrontal activation post-CBT relative to pre-CBT in individuals with social anxiety (Klumpp et al., 2013). Nevertheless, the role that CBT plays in dorsal versus ventral prefrontal–amygdala circuitry in humans has not been systematically studied. Moreover, recovery rates of patients with anxiety undergoing psychological treatment are less than 50% (Community and Mental Health team, 2014), so it is plausible that these mechanisms are again only relevant in a subset of patients.
Conclusions and future directions
In this review, we have outlined evidence across animals and humans suggesting that bi-directional prefrontal–subcortical circuits and their interactions may drive elevated aversive processing, or negative bias, in anxiety. Specifically, we point to converging evidence within the Negative Valance Systems domain of the RDoC which suggests that ventral PFC–subcortical circuitry in humans may be associated with reduced negative bias, while more dorsal PFC–subcortical circuitry may be associated with increased negative bias. Moreover, we provide evidence suggesting that the emergence of anxiety in adolescence may be a result of differential developmental trajectories of these circuits and that both pharmacological and psychological interventions might be effective by modulating the overall balance of these circuits in driving negative affective bias. These findings are summarised in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic summarising findings and proposed simplified model of negative affective bias in anxiety. Bi-directional excitatory connections between dorsal regions of the mPFC/ACC and the amygdala promote negative bias, while inhibitory connections between ventral regions coupled with the amygdala inhibit negative bias. The ventral inhibitory circuit may only fully develop in adulthood, meaning that adolescence is a period of high vulnerability to negative bias. Successful treatments (SSRIs and CBT) may be effective via promotion of the ventral circuit and inhibition of the dorsal circuit.
ACC: anterior cingulate cortex; mPFC: medial prefrontal cortex; CBT: cognitive-behavioural therapy; SSRI: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
Nevertheless, it is still unclear exactly how we bridge the gap between brain and behaviour. Although we can associate these circuits with negative bias, we cannot yet say how exactly the underlying neuronal activity is translated into observable behaviour. One particularly promising avenue in this regard is the nascent field of computational psychiatry, which attempts to bridge the gap between brain activation and observable symptoms (Huys et al., 2016). Specifically, using mathematical theories of cognition and human behaviour, computational psychiatry aims to objectively quantify the calculations generated by neurons which shape behaviour (Huys et al., 2016). This work is in its infancy but has begun to delineate the computational basis of common symptoms in anxiety linked to negative bias, such as avoidance (Mkrtchian et al., 2017), risk aversion (Charpentier et al., 2017) and goal-directed behaviour (Carlisi et al., 2017; Gillan et al., 2014).
Furthermore, if we are to understand current findings in a truly generalisable context, it is critical to investigate these mechanisms in large-scale populations. Cohort studies are an ideal way to examine these questions at the population level, often sampling from a diverse community of individuals. Data sharing efforts have attempted to address this. For example, the ENIGMA consortium is an international collaboration of research centres which aims to combine neuroimaging and genetic datasets from sites around the world in an attempt to amass sample sizes large enough to detect very small effects in brain imaging and genetic data (Thompson et al., 2014). Moreover, the UK Biobank (Sudlow et al., 2015) is a consortium across 22 research centres in the United Kingdom with genetic and longitudinal physical health and behavioural data on over 500,000 participants, all of which has been made open access. These are early efforts, particularly in the field of anxiety disorders, but promising mega- and meta-analyses have already come out of such efforts in other fields of psychiatry such as obsessive–compulsive disorder and schizophrenia (Boedhoe et al., 2016; De Wit et al., 2014; Van Erp et al., 2016).
Finally, it is important to investigate how these effects change over time. That is, are these mechanisms stable, or do they change across development to influence symptom onset and persistence? Longitudinal studies are critical for understanding these questions. There have been longitudinal studies investigating brain changes over time in adolescents (e.g. the IMAGEN study; Schumann et al., 2010), but this investigation needs to be scaled up to larger populations and multiple time points and age ranges if we are to truly understand the developmental changes that occur across the life course of anxiety disorders. One promising example of this work currently underway is the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study (ABCD; https://abcdstudy.org/index.html), which is the largest long-term longitudinal study of brain development in the United States, currently in the process of collecting biological and behavioural data on over 10,000 children aged 9–10. Similarly, to gain an understanding of the underlying genetic contributions of anxiety, it is important to investigate the extent to which certain features and symptoms are heritable. This can be achieved through longitudinal twin studies (e.g. the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS; Oliver and Plomin, 2007) and the Tennessee Twin Study (Lahey et al., 2008)), but many of the existing studies do not focus on brain imaging due to limited time and resources and the high cost involved in neuroimaging research. Regardless, observational population-based studies are an important complimentary approach to the small-scale case–control designs more frequently implemented in neuroimaging research on anxiety.
In conclusion, work has begun to delineate overlapping neural networks involving the PFC and subcortical regions including the amygdala that may drive aversive responding and negative bias in both animals and humans. There is also promising evidence that pharmacological and psychological interventions can shape this circuitry and hence ameliorate negative affective bias. Future research should expand these findings to larger populations and investigate how these neural underpinnings arise in childhood/adolescence and change over time to shape behaviour.
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding: C.O.C. is supported by a Wellcome Trust Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship (206459/Z/17/Z) and O.J.R. is supported by a Medical Research Council Career Development Award (MR/K024280/1).
ORCID iD: Christina O. Carlisi
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0942-8586
References
- Abend R, de Voogd L, Salemink E, et al. (2017) Association between attention bias to threat and anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents. Depression and Anxiety 35(3): 229–238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Agustín-Pavón C, Braesicke K, Shiba Y, et al. (2012) Lesions of ventrolateral prefrontal or anterior orbitofrontal cortex in primates heighten negative emotion. Biological Psychiatry 72(4): 266–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andersen SL. (2003) Trajectories of brain development: Point of vulnerability or window of opportunity? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 27(1–2): 3–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arnaudova I, Krypotos A-M, Effting M, et al. (2013) Individual differences in discriminatory fear learning under conditions of ambiguity: A vulnerability factor for anxiety disorders? Frontiers in Psychology 4: 298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arruda-Carvalho M, Wu W-C, Cummings KA, et al. (2017) Optogenetic examination of prefrontal-amygdala synaptic development. Journal of Neuroscience 37(11): 2976–2985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aue T, Okon-Singer H. (2015) Expectancy biases in fear and anxiety and their link to biases in attention. Clinical Psychology Review 42: 83–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aylward J, Robinson OJ. (2017) Towards an emotional ‘stress test’: A reliable, non-subjective cognitive measure of anxious responding. Scientific Reports 7: 40094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beck AT. (1967) Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. [Google Scholar]
- Beck AT, Clark DA. (1997) An information processing model of anxiety: Automatic and strategic processes. Behaviour Research and Therapy 35(1): 49–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beesdo K, Knappe S, Pine DS. (2009) Anxiety and anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: Developmental issues and implications for DSM-V. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 32(3): 483–524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bickart KC, Dickerson BC, Barrett LF. (2014) The amygdala as a hub in brain networks that support social life. Neuropsychologia 63: 235–248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Birn RM, Shackman AJ, Oler JA, et al. (2014) Evolutionarily conserved prefrontal-amygdalar dysfunction in early-life anxiety. Molecular Psychiatry 19(8): 915–922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bishop SJ. (2007) Neurocognitive mechanisms of anxiety: An integrative account. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(7): 307–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boedhoe PS, Schmaal L, Abe Y, et al. (2016) Distinct subcortical volume alterations in pediatric and adult OCD: A worldwide meta-and mega-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry 174(1): 60–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boeke EA, Moscarello JM, LeDoux JE, et al. (2017) Active avoidance: Neural mechanisms and attenuation of pavlovian conditioned responding. Journal of Neuroscience 37(18): 4808–4818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bradford DE, Starr MJ, Shackman AJ, et al. (2015) Empirically based comparisons of the reliability and validity of common quantification approaches for eyeblink startle potentiation in humans. Psychophysiology 52(12): 1669–1681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bremner JD. (2004) Brain imaging in anxiety disorders. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 4(2): 275–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Britton JC, Lissek S, Grillon C, et al. (2011) Development of anxiety: The role of threat appraisal and fear learning. Depression and Anxiety 28(1): 5–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brooks SJ, Stein DJ. (2015) A systematic review of the neural bases of psychotherapy for anxiety and related disorders. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 17(3): 261–279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown R, Galanter E, Hess EH, et al. (1962). New directions in psychology. Oxford: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. [Google Scholar]
- Bukalo O, Pinard CR, Silverstein S, et al. (2015) Prefrontal inputs to the amygdala instruct fear extinction memory formation. Science Advances 1(6): e1500251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burgos-Robles A, Vidal-Gonzalez I, Quirk GJ. (2009) Sustained conditioned responses in prelimbic prefrontal neurons are correlated with fear expression and extinction failure. Journal of Neuroscience 29(26): 8474–8482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buzzell GA, Troller-Renfree SV, Barker TV, et al. (2017) A neurobehavioral mechanism linking behaviorally inhibited temperament and later adolescent social anxiety. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 56(12): 1097–1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calhoon GG, Tye KM. (2015) Resolving the neural circuits of anxiety. Nature Neuroscience 18: 1394–1404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campese VD, Gonzaga R, Moscarello JM, et al. (2015) Modulation of instrumental responding by a conditioned threat stimulus requires lateral and central amygdala. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 9: 293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campese VD, Soroeta JM, Vazey EM, et al. (2017) Noradrenergic regulation of central amygdala in aversive pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer. eNeuro 4(5): pii. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carlisi CO, Norman L, Murphy CM, et al. (2017) Shared and disorder-specific neurocomputational mechanisms of decision-making in autism spectrum disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Cerebral Cortex 27(12): 5804–5816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Casey B, Jones RM, Hare TA. (2008) The adolescent brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1124(1): 111–126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caspi A, Houts RM, Belsky DW, et al. (2014) The p factor: One general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders? Clinical Psychological Science 2(2): 119–137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cavanagh JF, Meyer A, Hajcak G. (2017) Error-specific cognitive control alterations in generalized anxiety disorder. Biological Psychiatry 2(5): 413–420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chan T, Kyere K, Davis BR, et al. (2011) The role of the medial prefrontal cortex in innate fear regulation in infants, juveniles, and adolescents. Journal of Neuroscience 31(13): 4991–4999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang C-H, Berke JD, Maren S. (2010) Single-unit activity in the medial prefrontal cortex during immediate and delayed extinction of fear in rats. PLoS ONE 5(8): e11971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charpentier CJ, Aylward J, Roiser JP, et al. (2017) Enhanced risk aversion, but not loss aversion, in unmedicated pathological anxiety. Biological Psychiatry 81(12): 1014–1022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cho J-H, Deisseroth K, Bolshakov VY. (2013) Synaptic encoding of fear extinction in mPFC-amygdala circuits. Neuron 80(6): 1491–1507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cisler JM, Koster EH. (2010) Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review 30(2): 203–216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clark LA, Cuthbert B, Lewis-Fernández R, et al. (2017) Three approaches to understanding and classifying mental disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). Psychological Science in the Public Interest 18(2): 72–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clauss JA, Blackford JU. (2012) Behavioral inhibition and risk for developing social anxiety disorder: A meta-analytic study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 51(10): 1066–1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cohen MM, Tottenham N, Casey BJ. (2013) Translational developmental studies of stress on brain and behavior: Implications for adolescent mental health and illness? Neuroscience 249: 53–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Community and Mental Health team (2014) Psychological therapies, annual report on the use of IAPT services: England– 2013/14. Available at: https://digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB14899
- Cools R, Roberts AC, Robbins TW. (2008) Serotoninergic regulation of emotional and behavioural control processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12(1): 31–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Copeland WE, Angold A, Shanahan L, et al. (2014) Longitudinal patterns of anxiety from childhood to adulthood: The great smoky mountains study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 53(1): 21–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Courtin J, Chaudun F, Rozeske RR, et al. (2014) Prefrontal parvalbumin interneurons shape neuronal activity to drive fear expression. Nature 505(7481): 92–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Craske MG, Stein MB, Eley TC, et al. (2017) Anxiety disorders. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 3: 17024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crockett M, Clark L, Roiser J, et al. (2012) Converging evidence for central 5-HT effects in acute tryptophan depletion. Molecular Psychiatry 17(2): 121–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crockett MJ, Clark L, Robbins TW. (2009) Reconciling the role of serotonin in behavioral inhibition and aversion: Acute tryptophan depletion abolishes punishment-induced inhibition in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 29(38): 11993–11999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cullen KR, Gee DG, Klimes-Dougan B, et al. (2009) A preliminary study of functional connectivity in comorbid adolescent depression. Neuroscience Letters 460(3): 227–231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cuthbert BN, Insel TR. (2013) Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: The seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Medicine 11: 126–126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis M. (1998) Are different parts of the extended amygdala involved in fear versus anxiety? Biological Psychiatry 44(12): 1239–1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis M. (2000) The role of the amygdala in conditioned and unconditioned fear and anxiety. In: Aggleton JP. (ed.) The Amygdala: A Functional Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 213–288. [Google Scholar]
- Davis M. (2001) Fear-Potentiated Startle in Rats: Current Protocols in Neuroscience. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis M, Walker DL, Miles L, et al. (2010) Phasic vs sustained fear in rats and humans: Role of the extended amygdala in fear vs anxiety. Neuropsychopharmacology 35(1): 105–135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dayan P, Huys QJM. (2009) Serotonin in affective control. Annual Review of Neuroscience 32(2): 95–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Wit SJ, Alonso P, Schweren L, et al. (2014) Multicenter voxel-based morphometry mega-analysis of structural brain scans in obsessive-compulsive disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry 171(3): 340–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DiLuca M, Olesen J. (2014) The cost of brain diseases: A burden or a challenge? Neuron 82(6): 1205–1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dodd HF, Vogt J, Turkileri N, et al. (2017) Task relevance of emotional information affects anxiety-linked attention bias in visual search. Biological Psychology 122: 13–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Do-Monte FH, Manzano-Nieves G, Quiñones-Laracuente K, et al. (2015) Revisiting the role of infralimbic cortex in fear extinction with optogenetics. Journal of Neuroscience 35(8): 3607–3615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erk S, Abler B, Walter H. (2006) Cognitive modulation of emotion anticipation. European Journal of Neuroscience 24(4): 1227–1236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Etkin A, Wager TD. (2007) Functional neuroimaging of anxiety: A meta-analysis of emotional processing in PTSD, social anxiety disorder, and specific phobia. American Journal of Psychiatry 164(10): 1476–1488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Etkin A, Egner T, Kalisch R. (2011) Emotional processing in anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15(2): 85–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Felix-Ortiz A, Burgos-Robles A, Bhagat N, et al. (2016) Bidirectional modulation of anxiety-related and social behaviors by amygdala projections to the medial prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience 321: 197–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Felix-Ortiz AC, Beyeler A, Seo C, et al. (2013) BLA to vHPC inputs modulate anxiety-related behaviors. Neuron 79(4): 658–664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fox AS, Shackman AJ. (2017) The central extended amygdala in fear and anxiety: Closing the gap between mechanistic and neuroimaging research. Neuroscience Letters. Epub ahead of print 30 November. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.11.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ganella DE, Kim JH. (2014) Developmental rodent models of fear and anxiety: From neurobiology to pharmacology. British Journal of Pharmacology 171(20): 4556–4574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ganella DE, Barendse MEA, Kim JH, et al. (2017) Prefrontal-amygdala connectivity and state anxiety during fear extinction recall in adolescents. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11: 584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gee DG, Gabard-Durnam LJ, Flannery J, et al. (2013. a) Early developmental emergence of human amygdala–prefrontal connectivity after maternal deprivation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(39): 15638–15643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gee DG, Humphreys KL, Flannery J, et al. (2013. b) A developmental shift from positive to negative connectivity in human amygdala–prefrontal circuitry. Journal of Neuroscience 33(10): 4584–4593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giedd JN, Blumenthal J, Jeffries NO, et al. (1999) Brain development during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal MRI study. Nature Neuroscience 2(10): 861–863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillan CM, Morein-Zamir S, Kaser M, et al. (2014) Counterfactual processing of economic action-outcome alternatives in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Further evidence of impaired goal-directed behavior. Biological Psychiatry 75(8): 639–646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giustino TF, Maren S. (2015) The role of the medial prefrontal cortex in the conditioning and extinction of fear. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 9: 298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glenn CR, Klein DN, Lissek S, et al. (2012) The development of fear learning and generalization in 8–13 year-olds. Developmental Psychobiology 54(7): 675–684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gold AL, Brotman MA, Adleman NE, et al. (2016) Comparing brain morphometry across multiple childhood psychiatric disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 55(12): 1027–1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goodkind M, Eickhoff SB, Oathes DJ, et al. (2015) Identification of a common neurobiological substrate for mental illness. JAMA Psychiatry 72(4): 305–315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Griebel G, Holmes A. (2013) 50 years of hurdles and hope in anxiolytic drug discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 12(9): 667–687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grillon C, Ameli R, Woods SW, et al. (1991) Fear-potentiated startle in humans: Effects of anticipatory anxiety on the acoustic blink reflex. Psychophysiology 28(5): 588–595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grillon C, Davis M. (2007) Effects of stress and shock anticipation on prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex. Psychophysiology 34(5): 511–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grupe DW, Nitschke JB. (2011) Uncertainty is associated with biased expectancies and heightened responses to aversion. Emotion 11(2): 413–424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grupe DW, Nitschke JB. (2013) Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: An integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14(7): 488–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gungor NZ, Paré D. (2016) Functional heterogeneity in the bed nucleus of the Stria Terminalis. Journal of Neuroscience 36(31): 8038–8049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gutman DA, Keifer OP, Jr, Magnuson ME, et al. (2012) A DTI tractography analysis of infralimbic and prelimbic connectivity in the mouse using high-throughput MRI. Neuroimage 63(2): 800–811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guyer AE, Monk CS, McClure-Tone EB, et al. (2008) A developmental examination of amygdala response to facial expressions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20(9): 1565–1582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hakamata Y, Lissek S, Bar-Haim Y, et al. (2010) Attention bias modification treatment: A meta-analysis toward the establishment of novel treatment for anxiety. Biological Psychiatry 68(11): 982–990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harlow HF, Harlow MK. (1965) Chapter 8: The affectional systems. In: Schrier AM, Stollnitz F, Harlow HF. (eds) Behavior of Nonhuman Primates. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, pp. 287–334. [Google Scholar]
- Harmer CJ, Cowen PJ, Goodwin GM. (2011) Efficacy markers in depression. Journal of Psychopharmacology 25(9): 1148–1158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harmer CJ, Goodwin GM, Cowen PJ. (2009) Why do antidepressants take so long to work? A cognitive neuropsychological model of antidepressant drug action. British Journal of Psychiatry 195(2): 102–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herry C, Ciocchi S, Senn V, et al. (2008) Switching on and off fear by distinct neuronal circuits. Nature 454(1): 600–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hess EH, Brown R, Galanter E, et al. (1962) New directions in psychology. [Google Scholar]
- Hettema JM, Prescott CA, Myers JM, et al. (2005) The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for anxiety disorders in men and women. Archives of General Psychiatry 62(2): 182–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hübner C, Bosch D, Gall A, et al. (2014) Ex vivo dissection of optogenetically activated mPFC and hippocampal inputs to neurons in the basolateral amygdala: Implications for fear and emotional memory. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 8: 64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huys QJM, Maia TV, Frank MJ. (2016) Computational psychiatry as a bridge from neuroscience to clinical applications. Nature Neuroscience 19(3): 404–413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, et al. (2010) Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry 167(7): 748–751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Izquierdo A, Murray EA. (2005) Opposing effects of amygdala and orbital prefrontal cortex lesions on the extinction of instrumental responding in macaque monkeys. European Journal of Neuroscience 22(9): 2341–2346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobs W, Nadel L. (1985) Stress-induced recovery of fears and phobias. Psychological Review 92(4): 512–531. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Janak PH, Tye KM. (2015) From circuits to behaviour in the amygdala. Nature 517(7534): 284–292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson FK, Delpech J-C, Thompson GJ, et al. (2018) Amygdala hyper-connectivity in a mouse model of unpredictable early life stress. Translational Psychiatry 8(1): 49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones PB. (2013) Adult mental health disorders and their age at onset. British Journal of Psychiatry 202(1): s5–s10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones SA, Morales AM, Lavine JB, et al. (2017) Convergent neurobiological predictors of emergent psychopathology during adolescence. Birth Defects Research 109(20): 1613–1622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaczkurkin A, Moore T, Calkins M, et al. (2017) Common and dissociable regional cerebral blood flow differences associate with dimensions of psychopathology across categorical diagnoses. Molecular Psychiatry. Epub ahead of print 19 September DOI: 10.1038/mp.2017.174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kagan J, Reznick JS, Snidman N. (1987) The physiology and psychology of behavioral inhibition in children. Child Development 58(6): 1459–1473. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalin NH. (2017) Mechanisms underlying the early risk to develop anxiety and depression: A translational approach. European Neuropsychopharmacology 27(6): 543–553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalin NH, Fox AS, Kovner R, et al. (2016) Overexpressing corticotropin-releasing factor in the primate amygdala increases anxious temperament and alters its neural circuit. Biological Psychiatry 80(5): 345–355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalin NH, Shelton SE, Davidson RJ. (2007) Role of the primate orbitofrontal cortex in mediating anxious temperament. Biological Psychiatry 62(10): 1134–1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalisch R, Gerlicher AMV. (2014) Making a mountain out of a molehill: On the role of the rostral dorsal anterior cingulate and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex in conscious threat appraisal, catastrophizing, and worrying. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 42: 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalisch R, Wiech K, Critchley HD, et al. (2006) Levels of appraisal: A medial prefrontal role in high-level appraisal of emotional material. Neuroimage 30(4): 1458–1466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kessler R, Avenevoli S, Costello E, et al. (2012) Prevalence, persistence, and sociodemographic correlates of DSM-IV disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication adolescent supplement. Archives of General Psychiatry 69(4): 372–380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kessler R, Demler R, Olfson F, et al. (2005) Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders, 1990 to 2003. New England Journal of Medicine 352(24): 2515–2523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim JJ, Fanselow MS. (1992) Modality-specific retrograde amnesia of fear. Science 256(5057): 675–677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim MJ, Whalen PJ. (2009) The structural integrity of an amygdala–prefrontal pathway predicts trait anxiety. Journal of Neuroscience 29(37): 11614–11618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim MJ, Gee DG, Loucks RA, et al. (2011. a) Anxiety dissociates dorsal and ventral medial prefrontal cortex functional connectivity with the amygdala at rest. Cerebral Cortex 21(7): 1667–1673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim MJ, Loucks RA, Palmer AL, et al. (2011. b) The structural and functional connectivity of the amygdala: From normal emotion to pathological anxiety. Behavioural Brain Research 223(2): 403–410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klavir O, Genud-Gabai R, Paz R. (2013) Functional connectivity between amygdala and cingulate cortex for adaptive aversive learning. Neuron 80(5): 1290–1300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klavir O, Prigge M, Sarel A, et al. (2017) Manipulating fear associations via optogenetic modulation of amygdala inputs to prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience 20(6): 836–844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kling A, Steklis H. (1976) A neural substrate for affiliative behavior in nonhuman primates. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 13(2–3): 216–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klumpp H, Fitzgerald DA, Phan KL. (2013) Neural predictors and mechanisms of cognitive behavioral therapy on threat processing in social anxiety disorder. Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry 45: 83–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klumpp H, Fitzgerald JM, Kinney KL, et al. (2017) Predicting cognitive behavioral therapy response in social anxiety disorder with anterior cingulate cortex and amygdala during emotion regulation. Neuroimage Clinical 15: 25–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kotov R, Krueger RF, Watson D, et al. (2017) The hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 126(4): 454–477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krueger RF, Eaton NR. (2015) Transdiagnostic factors of mental disorders. World Psychiatry 14(1): 27–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lahey BB, Applegate B, Hakes JK, et al. (2012) Is there a general factor of prevalent psychopathology during adulthood? Journal of Abnormal Psychology 121(4): 971–977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lahey BB, Rathouz PJ, Van Hulle C, et al. (2008) Testing structural models of DSM-IV symptoms of common forms of child and adolescent psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 36(2): 187–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lahey BB, Zald DH, Perkins SF, et al. (2017) Measuring the hierarchical general factor model of psychopathology in young adults. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 27(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laviolette SR, Lipski WJ, Grace AA. (2005) A subpopulation of neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex encodes emotional learning with burst and frequency codes through a dopamine D4 receptor-dependent basolateral amygdala input. Journal of Neuroscience 25(26): 6066–6075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LeDoux JE. (2000) Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience 23(1): 155–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Linnman C, Rougemont-Bücking A, Beucke JC, et al. (2011) Unconditioned responses and functional fear networks in human classical conditioning. Behavioural Brain Research 221(1): 237–245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Linnman C, Zeidan MA, Furtak SC, et al. (2012. a) Resting amygdala and medial prefrontal metabolism predicts functional activation of the fear extinction circuit. American Journal of Psychiatry 169(4): 415–423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Linnman C, Zeidan MA, Pitman RK, et al. (2012. b) Resting cerebral metabolism correlates with skin conductance and functional brain activation during fear conditioning. Biological Psychology 89(2): 450–459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Little JP, Carter AG. (2013) Synaptic mechanisms underlying strong reciprocal connectivity between the medial prefrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala. Journal of Neuroscience 33(39): 15333–15342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Livneh U, Paz R. (2012) Amygdala-prefrontal synchronization underlies resistance to extinction of aversive memories. Neuron 75(1): 133–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Machado CJ, Bachevalier J. (2008) Behavioral and hormonal reactivity to threat: Effects of selective amygdala, hippocampal or orbital frontal lesions in monkeys. Psychoneuroendocrinology 33(7): 926–941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McTeague LM, Huemer J, Carreon DM, et al. (2017) Identification of common neural circuit disruptions in cognitive control across psychiatric disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry 174(7): 676–685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maslowsky J, Mogg K, Bradley BP, et al. (2010) A preliminary investigation of neural correlates of treatment in adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology 20(2): 105–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mechias M-L, Etkin A, Kalisch R. (2010) A meta-analysis of instructed fear studies: Implications for conscious appraisal of threat. Neuroimage 49(2): 1760–1768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meyer A. (2017) A biomarker of anxiety in children and adolescents: A review focusing on the error-related negativity (ERN) and anxiety across development. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 27(1): 58–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Milad MR, Quirk GJ. (2002) Neurons in medial prefrontal cortex signal memory for fear extinction. Nature 420(6911): 70–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Milad MR, Quirk GJ. (2012) Fear extinction as a model for translational neuroscience: Ten years of progress. Annual Review of Psychology 63: 129–151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Milad MR, Rauch SL. (2007) The role of the orbitofrontal cortex in anxiety disorders. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1121: 546–561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Milad MR, Pitman RK, Ellis CB, et al. (2009) Neurobiological basis of failure to recall extinction memory in posttraumatic stress disorder. Biological Psychiatry 66(12): 1075–1082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Milad MR, Quirk GJ, Pitman RK, et al. (2007) A role for the human dorsal anterior cingulate cortex in fear expression. Biological Psychiatry 62(10): 1191–1194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mkrtchian A, Aylward J, Dayan P, et al. (2017) Modeling avoidance in mood and anxiety disorders using reinforcement learning. Biological Psychiatry 82(7): 532–539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Monk C, Nelson E, McClure E, et al. (2006) Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex activation and attentional bias in response to angry faces in adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry 163(6): 1091–1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morgan MA, LeDoux JE. (1995) Differential contribution of dorsal and ventral medial prefrontal cortex to the acquisition and extinction of conditioned fear in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience 109(4): 681–688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nugent NR, Tyrka AR, Carpenter LL, et al. (2011) Gene–environment interactions: Early life stress and risk for depressive and anxiety disorders. Psychopharmacology 214(1): 175–196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Okon-Singer H, Aue T. (2017) Neurocognitive mechanisms modulating attention bias in anxiety: Current perspectives. Biological Psychology: 122: 1–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oliver BR, Plomin R. (2007) Twins’ early development study (TEDS): A multivariate, longitudinal genetic investigation of language, cognition and behavior problems from childhood through adolescence. Twin Research and Human Genetics 10(1): 96–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Passamonti L, Crockett MJ, Apergis-Schoute AM, et al. (2012) Effects of acute tryptophan depletion on prefrontal-amygdala connectivity while viewing facial signals of aggression. Biological Psychiatry 71(1): 36–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pattwell SS, Liston C, Jing D, et al. (2016) Dynamic changes in neural circuitry during adolescence are associated with persistent attenuation of fear memories. Nature Communications 7: 11475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perna G, Favaron E, Di Bella D, et al. (2005) Antipanic efficacy of paroxetine and polymorphism within the promoter of the serotonin transporter gene. Neuropsychopharmacology 30(12): 2230–2235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phelps EA, Delgado MR, Nearing KI, et al. (2004) Extinction learning in humans: Role of the amygdala and vmPFC. Neuron 43(6): 897–905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phillips R, LeDoux J. (1992) Differential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience 106(2): 274–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pinard CR, Mascagni F, McDonald AJ. (2012) Medial prefrontal cortical innervation of the intercalated nuclear region of the amygdala. Neuroscience 205: 112–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pine DS. (2007) Research review: A neuroscience framework for pediatric anxiety disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 48(7): 631–648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Price JL, Drevets WC. (2012) Neural circuits underlying the pathophysiology of mood disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16(1): 61–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Regev L, Tsoory M, Gil S, et al. (2012) Site-specific genetic manipulation of amygdala corticotropin-releasing factor reveals its imperative role in mediating behavioral response to challenge. Biological Psychiatry 71(4): 317–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson OJ, Charney DR, Overstreet C, et al. (2012. a) The adaptive threat bias in anxiety: Amygdala–dorsomedial prefrontal cortex coupling and aversive amplification. Neuroimage 60(1): 523–529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson OJ, Cools R, Sahakian BJ. (2012. b) Tryptophan depletion disinhibits punishment but not reward prediction: Implications for resilience. Psychopharmacology 219(2): 599–605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson OJ, Krimsky M, Lieberman L, et al. (2014) The dorsal medial prefrontal (anterior cingulate) cortex–amygdala aversive amplification circuit in unmedicated generalised and social anxiety disorders: An observational study. Lancet Psychiatry 1(4): 294–302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson OJ, Krimsky M, Lieberman L, et al. (2016) Anxiety-potentiated amygdala-medial frontal coupling and attentional control. Translational Psychiatry 6(6): e833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson OJ, Overstreet C, Allen PS, et al. (2013. b) The role of serotonin in the neurocircuitry of negative affective bias: Serotonergic modulation of the dorsal medial prefrontal-amygdala ‘aversive amplification’ circuit. Neuroimage 78(1): 217–223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson OJ, Vytal K, Cornwell B, et al. (2013. a) The impact of anxiety upon cognition: Perspectives from human threat of shock studies. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rothbaum BO, Davis M. (2003) Applying learning principles to the treatment of post-trauma reactions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1008: 112–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roy AK, Vasa RA, Bruck M, et al. (2008) Attention bias toward threat in pediatric anxiety disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 47(10): 1189–1196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roy-Byrne P. (2015) Treatment-refractory anxiety; definition, risk factors, and treatment challenges. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 17(2): 191–206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rygula R, Clarke HF, Cardinal RN, et al. (2015) Role of central serotonin in anticipation of rewarding and punishing outcomes: Effects of selective amygdala or orbitofrontal 5-HT depletion. Cerebral Cortex 25(9): 3064–3076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santangelo AM, Roberts AC, Ferguson-Smith AC, et al. (2016) Novel primate model of serotonin transporter genetic polymorphisms associated with gene expression, anxiety and sensitivity to antidepressants. Neuropsychopharmacology 41(9): 2366–2376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sawyer SM, Azzopardi PS, Wickremarathne D, et al. (2018) The age of adolescence. Lancet Child & Adolescent Health 2(9): 223–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schumann G, Loth E, Banaschewski T, et al. (2010) The IMAGEN study: Reinforcement-related behaviour in normal brain function and psychopathology. Molecular Psychiatry 15(12): 1128–1139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Selden N, Everitt B, Jarrard L, et al. (1991) Complementary roles for the amygdala and hippocampus in aversive conditioning to explicit and contextual cues. Neuroscience 42(2): 335–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sengupta A, Yau JO, Bressel PJ-RD, et al. (2017) Basolateral amygdala neurons maintain aversive emotional salience. Journal of Neuroscience 38(12): 2460–2417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Senn V, Wolff SB, Herry C, et al. (2014) Long-range connectivity defines behavioral specificity of amygdala neurons. Neuron 81(2): 428–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shackman AJ, Fox AS. (2016) Contributions of the central extended amygdala to fear and anxiety. Journal of Neuroscience 36(31): 8050–8063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shackman AJ, Salomons TV, Slagter HA, et al. (2011) The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 12(3): 154–167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shackman AJ, Tromp DP, Stockbridge MD, et al. (2016) Dispositional negativity: An integrative psychological and neurobiological perspective. Psychol Bull 142(12): 1275–1314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shin LM, Liberzon I. (2009) The neurocircuitry of fear, stress, and anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 35(1): 169–191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shou H, Yang Z, Satterthwaite TD, et al. (2017) Cognitive behavioral therapy increases amygdala connectivity with the cognitive control network in both MDD and PTSD. Neuroimage Clinical 14(1): 464–470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sierra-Mercado D, Padilla-Coreano N, Quirk GJ. (2011) Dissociable roles of prelimbic and infralimbic cortices, ventral hippocampus, and basolateral amygdala in the expression and extinction of conditioned fear. Neuropsychopharmacology 36(2): 529–538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sotres-Bayon F, Sierra-Mercado D, Pardilla-Delgado E, et al. (2012) Gating of fear in prelimbic cortex by hippocampal and amygdala inputs. Neuron 76(4): 804–812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strawn JR, Bitter SM, Weber WA, et al. (2012) Neurocircuitry of generalized anxiety disorder in adolescents: A pilot functional neuroimaging and functional connectivity study. Depression and Anxiety 29(11): 939–947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N, et al. (2015) UK biobank: An open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Medicine 12(3): e1001779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Svihra M, Katzman MA. (2004) Behavioural inhibition: A predictor of anxiety. Paediatrics & Child Health 9(8): 547–550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swartz JR, Monk CS. (2013) The role of corticolimbic circuitry in the development of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. In: Andersen SL, Pine DS. (eds) The Neurobiology of Childhood. Berlin: Springer, pp. 133–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swartz JR, Carrasco M, Wiggins JL, et al. (2014) Age-related changes in the structure and function of prefrontal cortex–amygdala circuitry in children and adolescents: A multi-modal imaging approach. Neuroimage 86(2): 212–220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sylvester CM, Barch DM, Harms MP, et al. (2016) Early childhood behavioral inhibition predicts cortical thickness in adulthood. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 55(2): 122–129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Terburg D, Morgan BE, Montoya ER, et al. (2012) Hypervigilance for fear after basolateral amygdala damage in humans. Translational Psychiatry 2(5): e115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson PM, Stein JL, Medland SE, et al. (2014) The ENIGMA consortium: Large-scale collaborative analyses of neuroimaging and genetic data. Brain Imaging and Behavior 8(2): 153–182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tovote P, Fadok JP, Lüthi A. (2015) Neuronal circuits for fear and anxiety. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 16(10): 317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Erp TG, Hibar DP, Rasmussen JM, et al. (2016) Subcortical brain volume abnormalities in 2028 individuals with schizophrenia and 2540 healthy controls via the ENIGMA consortium. Molecular Psychiatry 21(4): 547–553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vidal-Gonzalez I, Vidal-Gonzalez B, Rauch SL, et al. (2006) Microstimulation reveals opposing influences of prelimbic and infralimbic cortex on the expression of conditioned fear. Learning & Memory 13(6): 728–733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vogt BA. (2005) Pain and emotion interactions in subregions of the cingulate gyrus. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6(7): 533–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vos T, Allen C, Arora M, et al. (2016) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388(10053): 1545–1602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vytal KE, Overstreet C, Charney DR, et al. (2014) Sustained anxiety increases amygdala–dorsomedial prefrontal coupling: A mechanism for maintaining an anxious state in healthy adults. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience 39(5): 321–329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White LK, Sequeira S, Britton JC, et al. (2017) Complementary features of attention bias modification therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in pediatric anxiety disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry 174(8): 775–784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]