Table 2.
TE subfamilies that show differences in abundance between subgenomes
| CLARITE name | TREP namea | A/Bb | A/Dc | B/Dd | Comment | Genomee |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTC_famc14 | DTC_Pavel | 1.9 | 0.4 | 0.2 | Enriched | D |
| DTC_famc8 | DTC_TAT4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.4 | Enriched | D |
| RLC_famc1.7 | RLC_Angela_A | 3.9 | 1.0 | 0.2 | Depleted | B |
| RLC_famc1.8 | RLC_Angela_B | 0.2 | 0.6 | 2.9 | Enriched | B |
| RLC_famc3.2 | RLC_Claudia | 1.9 | 4.1 | 2.2 | Enriched | A |
| RLG_famc1.2 | RLG_Fatima_E | 0.8 | 3.8 | 4.7 | Enriched | A |
| RLG_famc1.4 | RLG_Fatima_C | 0.2 | 3.9 | 20.9 | Enriched | B |
| RLG_famc1.5 | RLG_Fatima_B | 2.5 | 76.6 | 30.1 | Enriched | A |
| RLG_famc10.2 | RLG_Carmilla | 1.5 | 9.6 | 6.6 | Enriched | B |
| RLG_famc10.3 | RLG_Ifis | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.3 | Enriched | D |
| RLG_famc15 | RLG_Jeli | 1.0 | 3.3 | 3.4 | Depleted | D |
| RLG_famc3.1 | RLG_Laura_B | 1.0 | 4.8 | 5.0 | Depleted | D |
| RLG_famc3.4 | RLG_Laura_A | 1.0 | 5.3 | 5.3 | Depleted | D |
| RLG_famc7.2 | RLG_Erika | 4.9 | 2.0 | 0.4 | Enriched | A |
| RLG_famc7.3 | RLG_Sumaya | 2.9 | 4.1 | 1.4 | Enriched | A |
| RLG_famc7.4 | RLG_Sumana | 0.2 | 0.9 | 4.1 | Enriched | B |
| RLG_famc9.2 | RLG_Daniela | 0.6 | 7.1 | 11.0 | Enriched | B |
| RLX_famc4 | Unnamed | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | Enriched | D |
aName under which the family was previously described and/or stored in the TREP database
bcdRatio of abundance between subgenomes
eSubgenome in which abundance or distribution of the respective TE families differs