Table 1.

Number of common 1-Mb windows^a (above diagonal) and Pearson’s correlation (below diagonal) between response variables

	dEBVm	dEBVv	dEBVv_r0	ln_${\mathrm{\sigma }}_{\widehat{\mathrm{e}}}^2$
dEBVm		8	0	0
dEBVv	0.90 (0.02)		1	1
dEBVv_r0	0.19 (0.05)	0.53 (0.04)		2
ln_${\mathrm{\sigma }}_{\widehat{\mathrm{e}}}^2$	−0.01 (0.05)	0.08 (0.05)	0.24 (0.05)

^a Considering only the top 20 windows that explained the largest proportion of genetic variance for each response variable; dEBV_m and dEBV_v: deregressed EBV for mean and residual variance of yearling weight, respectively; dEBV_{v_r0} and ln_${\mathrm{\sigma }}_{\widehat{\mathrm{e}}}^2$: deregressed EBV for residual variance and log-transformed variance of estimated residuals, respectively, both assuming null genetic correlation between mean and residual variance. Standard errors are presented between brackets