Table 6.
Solid |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phylum | HRFI | LRFI | P-value | FDR | Log2 LRF1/HRFI | ρ | P-value |
HRFI n = 13 LRFI n = 11 | |||||||
F:B | 1.31 | 1.19 | NS | NS | n/a | -0.42 | <0.05 |
Actinobacteria | 1.80 | 1.73 | NS | NS | -0.06 | 0.41 | <0.1 |
Bacteroidetes | 31.95 | 33.44 | NS | NS | 0.07 | -0.21 | NS |
Chloroflexi | 0.30 | 0.40 | NS | NS | 0.45 | -0.11 | NS |
Cyanobacteria | 0.55 | 0.77 | NS | NS | 0.47 | -0.34 | <0.1 |
Elusimicrobia | 0.05 | 0.07 | NS | NS | 0.41 | -0.16 | NS |
Euryarchaeota | 5.75 | 6.03 | NS | NS | 0.07 | -0.10 | NS |
Fibrobacteres | 0.91 | 3.42 | <0.05 | NS | 1.92 | -0.47 | <0.05 |
Firmicutes | 41.96 | 39.72 | NS | NS | -0.08 | 0.43 | <0.05 |
LD1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NS | NS | -3.27 | -0.07 | NS |
Lentisphaerae | 0.06 | 0.06 | NS | NS | -0.08 | -0.26 | NS |
Planctomycetes | 0.17 | 0.39 | NS | NS | 1.16 | -0.22 | NS |
Proteobacteria | 11.90 | 8.49 | NS | NS | -0.49 | 0.03 | NS |
Spirochaetes | 2.28 | 2.57 | NS | NS | 0.18 | -0.15 | NS |
SRI | 0.01 | 0.01 | NS | NS | 0.96 | 0.11 | NS |
Synergistetes | 0.10 | 0.15 | NS | NS | 0.66 | -0.22 | NS |
Tenericutes | 0.83 | 0.97 | NS | NS | 0.21 | -0.27 | NS |
TM7 | 0.67 | 0.74 | NS | NS | 0.15 | 0.07 | NS |
Verrucomicrobia | 0.36 | 0.57 | NS | NS | 0.69 | -0.32 | NS |
WPS-2 | 0.09 | 0.09 | NS | NS | -0.04 | -0.16 | NS |
P-values are derived using a Wilcoxon Rank Sum test to assess the differences between treatments with FDR correction. The fold change between LRFI and HRFI bulls is also recorded in the table as is the correlation coefficient (ρ) and P-value for each phylum and RFI group.