Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 10;9:1842. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01842

Table 7.

Relationships between relative abundance of Fibrobacter and other genera present in the rumen solid and liquid digesta.

Phylum Classification Liquid ρ P-value Solid ρ P-value
Proteobacteria GMD14H09 0.48 0.01 0.85 0.00
Firmicutes Ruminococcus 0.68 0.00 0.79 0.00
Bacteroidetes Bacteroidales 0.56 0.00 0.76 0.00
Firmicutes RFN20 0.45 0.02 0.70 0.00
Firmicutes Ruminococcaceae 0.62 0.00 0.68 0.00
Bacteroidetes RF16 0.66 0.00 0.67 0.00
Euryarchaeota vadinCA11 0.52 0.01 0.65 0.00
Firmicutes Selenomonas 0.40 0.04 0.64 0.00
Firmicutes Clostridiaceae 0.47 0.01 0.64 0.00
Synergistetes Pyramidobacter 0.72 0.00 0.63 0.00
Firmicutes Clostridium 0.50 0.01 0.62 0.00
Bacteroidetes CF231 0.51 0.01 0.60 0.00
Bacteroidetes YRC22 0.63 0.00 0.60 0.00
Actinobacteria Adlercreutzia 0.53 0.00 0.59 0.00
Bacteroidetes BF311 0.40 0.04 0.59 0.00
Firmicutes Anaerovibrio 0.46 0.02 0.59 0.00
Tenericutes Anaeroplasma 0.61 0.00 0.58 0.00
Firmicutes Pseudobutyrivibrio 0.44 0.02 0.58 0.00
Planctomycetes Pirellulaceae 0.52 0.01 0.56 0.01
Spirochaetes Spirochaetaceae 0.49 0.01 0.54 0.01
Firmicutes Anaerofustis 0.52 0.01 0.54 0.01
Actinobacteria Atopobium 0.49 0.01 0.53 0.01
Euryarchaeota Methanobrevibacter 0.57 0.00 0.53 0.01
Chloroflexi SHD231 0.57 0.00 0.53 0.01
Firmicutes Mogibacterium 0.74 0.00 0.51 0.01
Firmicutes L7A 0.52 0.01 0.50 0.01
Firmicutes Moryella 0.56 0.00 0.48 0.02
Proteobacteria Sutterella -0.39 0.04 -0.48 0.02
Bacteroidetes Prevotella -0.44 0.02 -0.49 0.02
Firmicutes Acidaminococcus -0.44 0.02 -0.50 0.01
Firmicutes Bulleidia -0.48 0.01 -0.54 0.01
Firmicutes Catenibacterium -0.53 0.00 -0.60 0.00
Firmicutes Veillonellaceae -0.42 0.03 -0.66 0.00
Firmicutes Mitsuokella -0.39 0.05 -0.67 0.00
Actinobacteria Bifidobacteriaceae -0.62 0.00 -0.69 0.00
Firmicutes Lachnospiraceae -0.63 0.00 -0.77 0.00
Firmicutes Shuttleworthia -0.52 0.01 -0.78 0.00
Firmicutes Roseburia -0.55 0.00 -0.87 0.00

Only consistent relationships seen in both the solid and liquid digesta are summarized in the table. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to deduce the relationships.