Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Biomed Eng. 2018 May 10;46(9):1419–1431. doi: 10.1007/s10439-018-2044-4

Table 6.

Comparison of CAD performance between the new averaging (CC, MLO) method applied in this study and the conventional independent CC and MLO method.

Method Original segmentation Optimally mapped segmentation
DES images LE images DES images LE images
AUC Accuracy AUC Accuracy AUC Accuracy AUC Accuracy
Average (CC, ML) 0.76±0.05 68.3% 0.75±0.05 72.1% 0.74±0.05 68.5% 0.85±0.04 78.4%
Independent (CC, ML) 0.73±0.04 63.28% 0.81±0.03 74.77% 0.72±0.04 63.96% 0.78±0.03 72.07%