Table 6.
Comparison of CAD performance between the new averaging (CC, MLO) method applied in this study and the conventional independent CC and MLO method.
| Method | Original segmentation | Optimally mapped segmentation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DES images | LE images | DES images | LE images | |||||
| AUC | Accuracy | AUC | Accuracy | AUC | Accuracy | AUC | Accuracy | |
| Average (CC, ML) | 0.76±0.05 | 68.3% | 0.75±0.05 | 72.1% | 0.74±0.05 | 68.5% | 0.85±0.04 | 78.4% |
| Independent (CC, ML) | 0.73±0.04 | 63.28% | 0.81±0.03 | 74.77% | 0.72±0.04 | 63.96% | 0.78±0.03 | 72.07% |