Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 17;13(8):e0202687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202687

Table 3. Ultrasonographic diagnoses, cytological diagnoses, and BRAF mutation analyses of 29 thyroid nodules with the repeated fine-needle aspiration according to final results.


BRAF mutation analysis
Negative (n = 24) Positive (n = 5)
US diagnosis
Benign (n = 5) NH (1), NSBN (4) 0
Probably benign (n = 8) FA (1), NH (1), NSBN (6) 0
Indeterminate (n = 4) NSBN (3) PTC (1)
Suspicious for malignancy (n = 7) MTC (1), NSBN (5) PTC (1)
Malignant (n = 5) PTC (2) PTC (3)
Cytological diagnosis
(Bethesda category)
I (n = 2) PTC (1), NSBN (1) 0
II (n = 15) FA (1), NSBN (14) 0
III (n = 4) PTC (1), NSBN (3) 0
IV (n = 0) 0 0
V (n = 4) NH (2) PTC (2)
VI (n = 4) MTC (1) PTC (3)

Note.—Numbers in parentheses are prevalence of each item. US, ultrasonography; NH, nodular hyperplasia; NSBN, Non-surgical benign nodules, which were finally determined by repeated fine-needle aspiration cytology or fine-needle aspiration cytology and follow-up ultrasonographic findings. FA, follicular adenoma; MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; FTC, follicular thyroid carcinoma.