Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 17;13(8):e0202583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202583

Table 4. Conditional nalysis of the association of BMD with anti-CarPA and ACPA.

Location anti-CCP anti-CarPA (n)a Coefficient b SE p
LS negative negative (291) ref.
low-positive (23) -0.17 0.27 0.5
high-positive (19) -0.52 0.30 0.09
positive negative (101) -0.25 0.14 0.09
low-positive (45) 0.06 0.20 0.8
high-positive (53) -0.50 0.19 0.007
TH negative negative ref.
low-positive -0.27 0.19 0.16
high-positive -0.30 0.22 0.17
positive negative -0.10 0.10 0.3
low-positive 0.10 0.14 0.5
high-positive -0.37 0.13 0.005

Only the strongest associations from Table 3 were considered here.

a Number of patients in each stratum, which are identical for LS and for TH (not shown).

b Multiple linear regression analysis including as covariates sex, BMI, age at initiation, and menopause status for LS, and the same covariates plus a covariate for disease activity measured with HUPI for TH.