Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 17;13(8):e0202519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202519

Table 1. Callus rating scores (0–3) for seven Populus genotypes predicted to have high callus formation potential and seven Populus genotypes with low callus formation potential.

Dash (-) indicates callus cultures that were lost due to contamination.

Genotype Predicted Status High cytokinin, Low auxin High cytokinin, Med. auxin High cytokinin, High auxin Low cytokinin, Low auxin Low cytokinin, Med. auxin Low cytokinin, High auxin Mean1
BESC-18 High 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 2.5 1.90
BESC-233 High 3.0 3.0 - - 1.0 2.0 2.75
BESC-823 High 2.5 2.5 - 2.0 - 2.0 2.25
GW-9795 High 3.0 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.5 2.00
GW-9877 High 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.5 1.50
GW-9920 High 2.5 2.5 2.5 - 3.0 2.5 2.60
HOMB-21-2 High 2.0 2.0 1.5 2.0 - 1.88
Mean 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.6 2.2 3.3 2.09
BESC-100 Low 2.0 2.5 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.00
BESC-106 Low 1.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.00
BESC-352 Low - 1.5 0.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 1.50
BESC-856 Low 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 - 1.0 0.50
BESC-89 Low 0.0 2.0 - 1.5 - 2.0 1.38
GW-9904 Low 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 - 0.30
YALD-27-2 Low 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.08
Mean 0.7 0.9 0.6 1.2 1.1 1.3 0.96
Overall Mean 1.5 1.6 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.8

1Overall callus rating means between genotypes with high versus low callus formation potential was significant based on a t-test for two samples assuming unequal variances at p≤0.05.