Table 4.
Acceptability of the Tough Talks program among 32 HIV-infected MSM, Phase 2
| Survey item | Mean score |
|---|---|
| The program was interesting. | 1.13 |
| The program was visually appealing. | 1.73 |
| The program functions were easy to use. | 1.00 |
| My overall impression of the program was favorable. | 1.33 |
| The language in the program reflected language I might use or hear. | 1.67 |
| I felt comfortable interacting with the virtual character(s) in this program. | 1.73 |
| I found the virtual character I was talking to visually appealing. | 1.83 |
| The program layout and structure was easy to understand and navigate. | 1.53 |
| I felt comfortable talking about HIV in this setting. (The park) | 1.53 |
| I felt comfortable talking about HIV in this setting. (The bar) | 3.00 |
| This program could help me have conversations around HIV with another person. | 1.33 |
| I can see myself using something like this when it’s completed. | 1.33 |
Averaged score on 5 point Likert scale reported, (1=strongly agree; 2=agree; 3=neither agree nor disagree; 4=disagree; 5=strongly disagree)