Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 20;22(8):2662–2673. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-2078-5

Table 4.

Predictors of ring ratings after one-month of use (N = 254 visits)

N (%) βa 95% CI p value
Baseline participant characteristics
 Age
  18–24 171 (67.3) Ref
  25–30 83 (32.7) 0.25 − 0.10, 0.61 0.165
 Site
  South Africa 127 (50.0) Ref
  Kenya 127 (50.0) − 0.32 − 0.66, 0.01 0.058
 Married or cohabiting 66 (26.0) − 0.32 − 0.81, 0.17 0.204
 Ever pregnant 201 (79.1) − 0.02 − 0.45, 0.41 0.204
 Completed secondary school 133 (52.4) − 0.30 − 0.66, 0.06 0.099
 Earns an income 80 (31.6) 0.15 − 0.26, 0.56 0.477
 Who she lives with
  Parents or grandparents 129 (50.8) Ref
  Husband/boyfriend 69 (27.2) − 0.40 − 0.94, 0.15 0.151
  Other 56 (22.1) − 0.41 − 0.87, 0.06 0.085
 Food insecurity
  Never 116 (45.7) Ref
  Rarely or sometimes 100 (39.4) 0.19 − 0.21, 0.58 0.351
  Often 38 (15.0) 0.47 − 0.03, 0.97 0.066
 Has privacy in the home 209 (82.6) 0.39 − 0.05, 0.84 0.085
 Ever used IUD or implant 98 (38.6) 0.25 − 0.1, 0.59 0.157
 Any vaginal insertion, past 3 months 166 (65.4) − 0.20 − 0.56, 0.16 0.279
Sexual behavior
 # sex acts, past month (mean, SD) 4.39 (4.8) 0.04 0.00, 0.07 0.025
 # sex partners, past month
  0 or 1 232 (91.3) Ref
  > 1 22 (8.7) 0.26 − 0.35, 0.87 0.403
Product attributes
 Reports the following attribute as acceptable (vs. unacceptable)
  Product look 169 (66.5) 1.36 1.02, 1.70 < 0.001
  Ease of use 189 (74.4) 1.81 1.47, 2.14 < 0.001
  Interference with normal activities 186 (73.2) 1.45 1.11, 1.79 < 0.001
  Ring size 156 (61.4) 0.80 0.46, 1.14 < 0.001
  Inserting the ring 162 (63.8) 0.78 0.41, 1.14 < 0.001
  Removing the ring 179 (72.5) 0.53 0.12, 0.94 0.011
  How the ring felt during sex 142 (55.9) 1.36 1.01, 1.7 < 0.001
  How the ring felt to partner during sex 151 (59.7) 1.12 0.74, 1.49 < 0.001
  How the ring felt during menses 137 (53.9) 0.93 0.52, 1.34 < 0.001
  Leaving in ring for entire month 180 (71.7) 1.68 1.35, 2.00 < 0.001
  How the ring felt in hands 156 (61.7) 0.58 0.24, 0.93 0.001
 Possible to use without partner knowledge 159 (62.6) 0.49 0.14, 0.84 0.006
 Possible to use without family knowledge 204 (80.3) − 0.01 − 0.45, 0.44 0.981

aAdjusted for age, study site (South Africa vs. Kenya), and randomization sequence