Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 13;13:2409–2423. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S152723

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariable analyses (logistic regression) of factors responsible for switch to triple therapy

Response Effect Odds ratio estimate 95 CI
Univariate analysis
Switch to TRIPLE Randomized treatment: FP/SAL vs TIO 0.840 0.559 1.263
GOLD patient category 1: C and D vs A and B 4.011 2.520 6.383
GOLD patient category 2: B and D vs A and C 1.790 1.145 2.796
Eosinophil: ≥2% vs <2% 0.756 0.395 1.445
Sex: female vs male 2.907 1.160 7.287
Age: 65–74 vs 18–64 years 3.181 1.774 5.706
Age: ≥75 vs 18–64 years 4.081 2.030 8.205
Smoking history: current smoker vs former smoker 0.751 0.493 1.144
RS-subscale breathlessness: mean baseline 1.229 1.152 1.311
RS-subscale cough and sputum: mean baseline 1.213 1.067 1.379
RS-subscale chest symptoms: mean baseline 1.399 1.242 1.575
Multivariable analysis
Switch to TRIPLE Randomized treatment (FP/SAL vs TIO) 0.952 0.603 1.504
GOLD group (C and D vs A and B) 3.362 2.047 5.523
Age 65–74 vs 18–64 years 2.862 1.539 5.323
Age ≥75 vs 18–64 years 3.141 1.485 6.643
RS-subscale chest symptoms (baseline) 1.371 1.208 1.555

Abbreviations: FP/SAL, fluticasone propionate/salmeterol; GOLD, Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2011 criteria; RS, respiratory symptoms; TIO, tiotropium.