TABLE 4.
Comparison of Blinded Trainee Performance Versus Blinded Trainer Performance, On Both Glass Slides and Digital Images, Using Slides Stained With the 5C12 Method
| Rater |
Sensitivity % |
Specificity % |
Density |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anatomical Site | SMG | COL | SKIN | SMG | COL | SKIN | SMG | COL | SKIN |
| Glass slides | |||||||||
| Trainee 1 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 3 | 1.75 | 2.25 |
| Trainee 2 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 3 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Trainee 3 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 3 | 1.7 | 1.3 |
| Trainee 4 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 3 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| All trainees (mean) | 100 | 100 | 83.5 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 3 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Trainer | 100 | 100 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 3 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
| Digital images | |||||||||
| Trainee 1 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 3 | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| Trainee 2 | 100 | 67* | 100 | 100 | 67* | 100 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 1.25 |
| Trainee 3 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 3 | 1.6 | 1.1 |
| Trainee 4 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 3 | 1.25 | 1.6 |
| All trainees (mean) | 100 | 92 | 75 | 100 | 92 | 100 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| Trainer | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 3 | 1.5 | 2.1 |
*
Corrected on blinded re-read with corrected sensitivity and specificity of 100%, second read data used for density calculations.