Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aging Ment Health. 2017 Nov 24;23(2):255–262. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1402292

Table 3.

Full Models of Role Captivity and Overload over 12 Months

Role Captivity
Role Overload
Effect Estimate (s.e.) Estimate (s.e.)
Intercept 3.99 (0.59)*** 2.84 (0.44)***
Timea −0.01 (0.00) 0.00 (0.00)
Time to take breaksb n/a −0.12 (0.03)***
Transition 0.09 (0.18) −1.05 (0.69)
Time × Transition −0.09 (0.02)*** −0.02 (0.03)
Time × Transition × Non-care stressorsc 0.02 (0.01)*** n/a
Memory problemsc 0.03 (0.07) 0.08 (0.06)
ADL dependency of PWDsc 0.00 (0.12) 0.14 (0.10)
BPSD stressorsc 0.01 (0.01) 0.01 (0.01)
Non-care stressors 0.04 (0.04) 0.08 (0.03)*
Total # of ADS daysc −0.13 (0.05)* n/a
Relationship qualityc −0.28 (0.09)** −0.17 (0.08)*
Family supportc −0.21 (0.06)** n/a
Transition × Relationship quality n/a 0.37 (0.20)

Notes. Non-significant 2-way and 3-way interactions were trimmed; ADL= Activities of Daily Living; PWD=Person with dementia; BPSD= Behavior problems and symptoms of dementia; ADS= Adult Day Services.

a

Coded as 0, 6, 12 to reflect months between interviews over time.

b

This was a time-varying variable.

c

These were time invariant variables measured only at baseline.

p ≤ .1

*

p ≤ .05

**

p ≤ .01

***

p ≤ .001