Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug;58:13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.04.009

Table 1.

Details of focus groups and participants.

Focus group Group type a Group composition b Age range Alcohol units in past week
1 Students Mixed (3F 2M) 20–21 20–51
2 Manual workers Single (4F) 19–25 0–14
3 Students Mixed (2F 2M) 18–21 0–35
4 Manual workers Mixed (4F 2M) 22–27 8–31
5 Niche venue attenders Mixed (2F 2M) 20–24 22–31
6 Professional workers Single (4F) 25–28 9–22
7 Students Mixed (1F 3M) 20–22 52–110
8 Students Single (4F) 20–21 9–31
9 Niche venue attenders Mixed (3F 1M) 21–23 12–74
10 Professional workers Mixed (2F 2M) 24–29 19–52
11 Niche venue attenders Mixed (3F 1M) All 22 21–63
12 Students Mixed (1F 4M) 18–21 17–25
13 Manual workers Single (4M) 23–27 7–48
14 Manual workers Single (5M) 23–29 42–120
15 Mainstream venue attenders Mixed (1F 3M) 18–26 0–48
16 Mainstream venue attenders Mixed (2F 3M) 19–27 1–50
17 Professional workers Mixed (1F 3M) 22–29 21–50
18 Student Group Mixed (1F 3M) 18–23 0–40
19 Niche venue attenders Mixed (1F 3M) 23–27 6–40
20 Bar Workers Mixed (4F 1M) 21–29 2–27
21 Catering Workers Mixed (3F 1M) 21–25 14–45
a

These categorisations should be considered as giving a ‘flavour’ of the group as a whole; some could have been categorised in multiple ways (e.g. niche venue attenders but also containing some university students).

b

F female; M male.