Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 17;14:241. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1556-3

Table 2.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores (Mean ± SD) for each group (control, MSC-naïve, MSC-primed)

MRI grading parameter Two months end-point
(Phase 2 carpi)
Six months end-point
(Phase 1 carpi)
Control
n = 4
MSC-naïve
n = 7
MSC-primed
n = 7
Control
n = 4
MSC-naïve
n = 7
MSC-primed
n = 7
Osteophyte formation 0.25 ± 0.50 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.33 ± 0.58 0.00 ± 0.00
Synovial effusion 1.50 ± 0.58a,b 0.67 ± 0.58a,c 2.25 ± 0.50b 1.25 ± 0.50 1.33 ± 0.58 1.75 ± 0.96
Osseous edema 0.25 ± 0.50 0.33 ± 0.58 1.25 ± 1.26 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.25 ± 0.50
Subchondral bone damage 1.00 ± 0.00 0.33 ± 0.58 0.50 ± 0.58 0.25 ± 0.50 0.33 ± 0.58 0.75 ± 0.50

Scores are shown for each MRI grading parameter in each group at each assessed end-point (six and two months, phases 1 and 2). The number (n) of radio-carpal (RC) joints assessed in each group at each end-point is showed in the table. Higher scores mean higher severity of the MRI findings, 4 being the highest possible score for each parameter. Different letters mean statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Note that significant differences were only found between groups for the parameter synovial effusion at two months (phase 2), but not for other parameters or between two and six months