. 2018 Jul 16;55(9):3391–3398. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3227-6

Table 3.

The textural profile analysis of chestnuts

Drying methods	Hardness/N	Adhesiveness/N mm	Cohesiveness	Springiness/mm	Gumminess/N	Chewiness/mJ
ND	591.15 ± 5.84^b	0.044 ± 0.007^c	0.591 ± 0.016^ab	0.81 ± 0.07^a	343.85 ± 8.45^b	289.27 ± 3.54^b
HAD	790.55 ± 11.10^a	0.09 ± 0.001^ab	0.619 ± 0.018^a	0.66 ± 0.02^b	551.80 ± 9.88^a	512.43 ± 5.70^a
FVD	623.90 ± 4.32^b	0.11 ± 0.001^a	0.536 ± 0.09^b	0.77 ± 0.02^ab	331.80 ± 6.22^b	242.36 ± 5.83^b
MD	521.10 ± 2.12^b	0.082 ± 0.003^b	0.53 ± 0.09^b	0.89 ± 0.01^a	256.45 ± 0.77^bc	251.36 ± 9.90^b
MVD	262.20 ± 7.75^c	0.047 ± 0.004^c	0.544 ± 0.014^b	0.84 ± 0.03^a	161.75 ± 7.68^c	119.06 ± 5.28^c

a, b, c, and d in the same column indicate significant mean difference by Tukey’s LSD test at P = 0.05